---
title: "ADV: adverb — definition and key papers — Elamur Research"
description: "ADV (adverb) is the universal part-of-speech tag in Universal Dependencies for words that typically modify verbs, adjectives, other adverbs or…"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/upos-adv/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/upos-adv/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [concepts](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/) / ADV: adverb

# 🏷️ ADV: adverb

Universal Dependencies · 7 key papers · [all concepts](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/)

Part of: [🗨️ Natural language processing](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/natural-language-processing/) · [🌐 Universal Dependencies](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/universal-dependencies/)

ADV (adverb) is the universal part-of-speech tag in Universal Dependencies for words that typically modify verbs, adjectives, other adverbs or whole clauses. They express time, place, manner, degree, direction or the speaker's stance, and they usually do not inflect for case or agreement.

Also: adverb, adverbial, UPOS ADV, Adv

## What it is

In [part-of-speech tagging](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/part-of-speech-tagging/), ADV marks words such as *quickly*, *very*, *here*, *yesterday* and *why*. These words add circumstances or degree to something else in the sentence. The guidelines of [Universal Dependencies](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/universal-dependencies/) define the class mainly by function. An adverb is a modifier of a predicate, a property word or another modifier, and it does not head a nominal phrase.

UD sorts phrasal units into nominals, clauses and modifiers ([Marneffe et al. 2021](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marneffe-2021-universal-dependencies/)). Adverbs are the most typical members of the modifier type.

ADV was already one of the twelve coarse categories in the universal tagset of Petrov, Das and McDonald ([Petrov et al. 2012](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/petrov-2012-universal-part-speech-tagset/)). UD extended that set to 17 tags ([Nivre et al. 2016](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nivre-2016-universal-dependencies-v1-multilingual-treebank/)), and the list is closed in v2 ([Nivre et al. 2020](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nivre-2020-universal-dependencies-v2-evergrowing-multilingual/)). The adverb class itself carried over largely unchanged.

### Borderline cases

The tag has several neighbours, and the boundary with each is drawn differently:

- ADV vs ADJ: *fast* in *runs fast* is ADV, but in *a fast car* it is ADJ.
- ADV vs ADP: English verb particles (*give up*) are usually ADP, attached as compound:prt. *Upstairs*, which takes no object, is ADV.
- ADV vs SCONJ: *when* and *where* are ADV when they modify the verb of their own clause. A pure subordinator such as *because* is SCONJ.
- ADV vs PART: English treebanks normally tag *not* as PART. Many other languages tag their negator as ADV.
- ADV vs PRON/DET: pronominal adverbs (*there*, *somehow*, *nowhere*) stay ADV but carry a PronType feature.

### Features

Typical features in the [morphology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/morphology/) layer include:

- Degree=Cmp or Degree=Sup for *faster* and *most*.
- PronType=Int, Rel, Dem, Ind, Neg or Tot for the pronominal series.
- NumType=Mult or Ord for *twice* and *firstly*.
- Polarity=Neg where the negator is an adverb.

Many adverbs carry no features at all. The feature inventory derives from Interset ([Nivre et al. 2016](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nivre-2016-universal-dependencies-v1-multilingual-treebank/)), Zeman's interlingua of morphosyntactic values ([Zeman 2008](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zeman-2008-reusable-tagset-conversion-tagset-drivers/)).

## Examples

- English: *She almost (ADV) never (ADV) arrives late (ADV).* Each adverb attaches by advmod. *Almost* modifies *never*, while *never* and *late* modify *arrives*.
- French: *Il parle très bien.* Here *très* depends on *bien*, which depends on *parle*.
- German: *Wir fahren morgen dorthin.* Both *morgen* and *dorthin* are ADV.
- Czech: *rychleji* "faster" is ADV with Degree=Cmp.

## Across languages

Languages draw the line between adjective and adverb in different places. German and Dutch often use the bare adjective form adverbially. Treebanks then must decide by syntactic position whether to tag ADJ or ADV.

Romance and Slavic languages derive manner adverbs productively, for example with French *-ment* or Czech *-e/-y*. English does the same with *-ly*.

Languages with rich pronominal series, such as Slavic *kde/tam/nikde* "where/there/nowhere", lean heavily on PronType.

Multiword adverbials such as French *tout à fait* "entirely" or English *of course* are split into words. Their internal links are marked with fixed.

## In treebanks and research

In English and French UD data, advmod is overwhelmingly the dominant relation for ADV.

- In English, the smaller shares go to root (adverbs heading fragments such as *Now?*), compound, obl and conj.
- In French, obl comes second, followed by mark and fixed. This reflects adverbs that introduce clauses and adverbs inside fixed multiword expressions.

Adverbs also make up a noticeably larger share of tokens in French than in English. See the [English](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/english/) and [French](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/french/) topic pages for more.

Moving from fine-grained tagsets to the coarse universal one costs little for downstream use. An English parser using 12 tags instead of the 45 Penn Treebank tags lost only about 0.6% accuracy ([Petrov et al. 2012](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/petrov-2012-universal-part-speech-tagset/)). Even so, the fuzzy ADV boundaries are a known source of disagreement between [treebanks](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/treebanks/) of one language ([Marneffe et al. 2017](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marneffe-2017-assessing-annotation-consistency-universal-dependencies/)).

Aggarwal and Zeman compare treebanks of the same language through their UPOS trigram distributions ([Aggarwal & Zeman 2020](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/aggarwal-2020-estimating-pos-annotation-consistency-different/)):

```
θpos(A,B) = KLcpos3(A,B) + KLcpos3(B,A)
```

In this formula, A and B are two treebanks. KLcpos3 is the asymmetric Kullback–Leibler divergence between their distributions of UPOS trigrams, and summing both directions makes θpos symmetric. Values at or below 0.5 indicate consistent annotation, and values at or above 4.0 indicate inconsistent annotation ([Aggarwal & Zeman 2020](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/aggarwal-2020-estimating-pos-annotation-consistency-different/)). A treebank that tags *not* or verb particles differently will shift such trigrams.

For [dependency parsing](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/dependency-parsing/), the near-deterministic pairing of ADV with advmod makes the tag a strong cue. Cross-lingual transfer exploits this cue, as in the delexicalized parsing experiments that first motivated the universal tagset ([Petrov et al. 2012](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/petrov-2012-universal-part-speech-tagset/)).

How often the tag ADV occurs: its share of all tokens Counted by code over the Universal Dependencies 2.18 treebanks of English and French (every token once, subtypes with their base relation).

**The numbers**

| Treebanks | Share |
| --- | --- |
| English treebanks | 4.86% of tokens (54,774 tokens) |
| French treebanks | 6.07% of tokens (66,154 tokens) |

The relations ADV words take most often The five most frequent in each language's treebanks, by tokens.

**The numbers**

| Pair | Tokens |
| --- | --- |
| English: advmod | 46,798 |
| English: root | 2,524 |
| English: compound | 972 |
| English: obl | 826 |
| English: conj | 749 |
| French: advmod | 53,184 |
| French: obl | 5,171 |
| French: mark | 2,043 |
| French: fixed | 1,378 |
| French: conj | 776 |

## Key papers

The works this page cites, the most cited first; citations as counted by OpenAlex plus the papers of this library that cite the work, read 2026-10-24.

- [Universal Dependencies v1: A Multilingual Treebank Collection](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nivre-2016-universal-dependencies-v1-multilingual-treebank/) — Joakim Nivre, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Filip Ginter et al. · 2016 · 1,741 citations
- [A Universal Part-of-Speech Tagset](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/petrov-2012-universal-part-speech-tagset/) — Slav Petrov, Dipanjan Das, Ryan McDonald · 2012 · 1,180 citations
- [Universal Dependencies](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marneffe-2021-universal-dependencies/) — Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Christopher D. Manning, Joakim Nivre et al. · 2021 · 480 citations
- [Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collection](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nivre-2020-universal-dependencies-v2-evergrowing-multilingual/) — Joakim Nivre, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Filip Ginter et al. · 2020 · 325 citations
- [Reusable Tagset Conversion Using Tagset Drivers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zeman-2008-reusable-tagset-conversion-tagset-drivers/) — Daniel Zeman · 2008 · 181 citations
- [Assessing the Annotation Consistency of the Universal Dependencies Corpora](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marneffe-2017-assessing-annotation-consistency-universal-dependencies/) — Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Matias Grioni, Jenna Kanerva et al. · 2017 · 30 citations
- [Estimating POS Annotation Consistency of Different Treebanks in a Language](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/aggarwal-2020-estimating-pos-annotation-consistency-different/) — Akshay Aggarwal, Daniel Zeman · 2020 · 7 citations

## Related concepts

- [Universal Dependencies](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/universal-dependencies/) — Universal Dependencies is a framework and an open collection of treebanks that annotates the grammar of many languages with one shared…
- [Part-of-speech tagging](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/part-of-speech-tagging/) — Part-of-speech tagging is the task of assigning each token in a text a grammatical category, such as noun, verb, adjective or determiner…
- [Morphology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/morphology/) — Morphology is the branch of linguistics that studies the internal structure of words. It covers how words are built from meaningful units…

## More papers

Topics: [🔤 Part-of-speech tagging](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/part-of-speech-tagging/) · [🌐 Universal Dependencies](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/universal-dependencies/)

Shelves: [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/)

- [← previous concept ADP: adposition](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/upos-adp/)
- [next concept → advcl: adverbial clause modifier](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/ud-advcl/)
- [↑ back to concepts](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/)
