---
title: "Arabic Language Sentiment Analysis on Health Services (2017)"
description: "The work tackles the shortage of Arabic sentiment resources by building a Twitter… 90% accuracy. 20 references, cited by 11 papers here."
authors: ["Abdulaziz M. Alayba", "Vasile Palade", "Matthew England", "Rahat Iqbal"]
year: 2017
venue: "arXiv:1702.03197 · Proc. 1st International Workshop on Arabic Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR '17), pp. 114-118. IEEE, 2017"
source: "https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.03197"
doi: "10.1109/asar.2017.8067771"
arxiv: "1702.03197"
licence: "arXiv — non-exclusive license to distribute"
licence_url: "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alayba-2017-arabic-language-sentiment-analysis-health/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alayba-2017-arabic-language-sentiment-analysis-health/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2017](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2017/page/3/) / Arabic Language Sentiment Analysis on Health Services

# Arabic Language Sentiment Analysis on Health Services

**Authors:** [Abdulaziz M. Alayba](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/abdulaziz-m-alayba/), [Vasile Palade](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/vasile-palade/), [Matthew England](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/matthew-england/) and [Rahat Iqbal](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/rahat-iqbal/) · **Year:** 2017 · **Venue:** arXiv:1702.03197 · Proc. 1st International Workshop on Arabic Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR '17), pp. 114-118. IEEE, 2017 · **Licence:** [arXiv — non-exclusive license to distribute](http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://doi.org/10.1109/asar.2017.8067771) · [PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.03197) · [DOI 10.1109/asar.2017.8067771](https://doi.org/10.1109/asar.2017.8067771) · [arXiv 1702.03197](https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.03197) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W2950962190)

**Citations:** 115 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) · [11](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alayba-2017-arabic-language-sentiment-analysis-health/cited-by/) in our library, of the 149,439 papers whose bibliographies we read

## Summary
The work tackles the shortage of Arabic sentiment resources by building a Twitter corpus of opinions about health services. Over six months in 2016, the authors gathered nearly 127 thousand tweets. Plain health keywords mostly returned opinion-free messages, so they collected from health-related trending hashtags and one hashtag they started themselves. Heavy filtering removed spam, neutral posts, retweets, duplicates and off-topic content, leaving 2026 tweets. The text was then normalized: diacritics and Tatweel were stripped, letter variants unified, elongated words shortened and compounds joined. Some spelling fixes and re-spacing were done by hand. Three annotators labelled each tweet as positive or negative. The authors then compared Naïve Bayes, SVM, Logistic Regression, a Deep Neural Network and a word2vec-based CNN. Accuracies fell roughly between 85% and 91%. SVM variants (Linear SVC and SGD) did best, and SVM accuracy came close to that of the first human annotator. The corpus gives Arabic opinion mining a labelled, domain-specific benchmark in an under-resourced area.

## Key points
- Collection window was 01/02/2016–31/07/2016. Of 126,959 retrieved tweets, 2026 survived filtering. The "Closing Hospital" hashtag alone fell from 105,275 to 1009 tweets.
- Four hashtags were used: Closing Hospital, Solving/Resolving Health and Improving Health, which were trending, plus Opinions about Health, which the authors launched specifically for this study.
- Labels are binary (positive or negative), assigned manually by three annotators. Neutral tweets were removed during filtering, and the resulting set is unbalanced toward negative.
- CNN setup:
  - input vectors from word2vec;
  - sequence length 52, matching the longest tweet;
  - filter windows of sizes 3 and 4;
  - 100 epochs;
  - an 80/20 train/test split;
  - about 90% accuracy (e.g., 274 of 290 negatives and 93 of 116 positives correct).
- On the DNN confusion matrix, 43 of 126 positive tweets were misclassified as negative. Most errors thus fall on the minority class.

## Interesting ideas
- When keyword search yields few opinions, the authors draw on trending topics and even seed their own hashtag to elicit the kind of text they need, which is a cheap way to target a genre.
- Measuring a classifier against each individual annotator, not only the pooled gold label, shows how close the model sits to human-level agreement.
- The normalization pipeline collapses spelling variants, elongated letters and look-alike foreign characters, and it fuses multiword names into single tokens before any learning.
- Reporting full confusion matrices rather than accuracy alone exposes that errors cluster on the minority (positive) class in an unbalanced set.
- The authors plan to study negation words explicitly as a future lever for sentiment accuracy, recognizing that bag-style features miss polarity flips.

## For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

- **I1** (learn): Prompting or harvesting text built around a deliberate topic could produce targeted evaluation material, such as opinion or evaluative sentences, for checking how frames handle stance.
- **I2** (learn): Witness-parser silver data could be scored the same way, comparing each witness and Mova against each other to estimate a realistic ceiling.
- **I3** (tokens): A similar explainable normalization layer for English social text could map elongations ("sooo") and joined multiword names to canonical tokens before tagging, logging each rewrite.
- **I4** (answer): Test reports on school tests or fable QA could break errors down by answer type, so that a high overall score cannot hide failure on rare categories.
- **I5** (frames): Polarity in prag frames should be computed from the negation's attachment in the UD tree, so that "not good" flips stance in an explainable way.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

## Institutions

- [Coventry University](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/coventry-university/) — University, Coventry, United Kingdom · 4 works · 411 citations

📚 Shelves (4): [🖥️ Computer Science](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/) · 16,667 works · [🤖 Artificial Intelligence](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/) · 16,194 works · [💭 Psychology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/psychology/) · 1,552 works · [💭 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/psychology/experimental-and-cognitive-psychology/) · 870 works

🧭 Topics (2): [😊 Sentiment & emotion](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/sentiment-emotion/) · 972 works · [Semitic languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/semitic-languages/) · 2,908 works

## Cite

Cite as: Abdulaziz M. Alayba, Vasile Palade, Matthew England and Rahat Iqbal. 2017. Arabic Language Sentiment Analysis on Health Services. arXiv:1702.03197 · Proc. 1st International Workshop on Arabic Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR '17), pp. 114-118. IEEE, 2017.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@misc{alayba2017arabic,
  title = {{Arabic Language Sentiment Analysis on Health Services}},
  author = {Abdulaziz M. Alayba, Vasile Palade, Matthew England and Rahat Iqbal},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.1109/asar.2017.8067771},
  eprint = {1702.03197},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/asar.2017.8067771}
}
```

- [← previous FOIL it! Find One mismatch between Image and Language caption](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shekhar-2017-foil-it-find-one-mismatch/)
- [next → Learning Distributed Representations of Texts and Entities from Knowledge Base](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yamada-2017-learning-distributed-representations-texts-entities/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2017](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2017/page/3/)

## References

20 references, 4 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. J. Gantz and D. Reinsel, “Big Data , Bigger Digital Shadows , and Biggest Growth in the Far East Executive Summary: A Universe of Opportunities and Challenges,” Idc, vol. 2007, no. December 2012, pp. 1–16, 2012. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=J%2E+Gantz+and+D%2E+Reinsel%2C+%E2%80%9CBig+Data+%2C+Bigger+Digital+Shadows+%2C+and+Biggest+Growth+in+the+Far+East+Executive+Summary%3A+A+Universe+of+Opportunities+and+Challenges%2C%E2%80%9D+Idc%2C+vol%2E+2007%2C+no%2E+December+2012%2C+pp%2E+)
2. B. Liu, “Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining,” Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–167, May 2012. [↗](https://doi.org/10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016)
3. B. Agarwal, N. Mittal, P. Bansal, and S. Garg, “Sentiment Analysis Using Common-Sense and Context Information,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2015, pp. 1–9, 2015. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/715730)
4. Mohammad Bin Rashid Sschool of Government, “The Arab Social Media Report.” [Online]. Available: [http://www.arabsocialmediareport.com/home/index.aspx](http://www.arabsocialmediareport.com/home/index.aspx). [Accessed: 02-Apr-2016]. [↗](http://www.arabsocialmediareport.com/home/index.aspx)
5. M. Speriosu, N. Sudan, S. Upadhyay, and J. Baldridge, “Twitter Polarity Classification with Label Propagation over Lexical Links and the Follower Graph,” Proc. Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process., pp. 53–56, 2011. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=M%2E+Speriosu%2C+N%2E+Sudan%2C+S%2E+Upadhyay%2C+and+J%2E+Baldridge%2C+%E2%80%9CTwitter+Polarity+Classification+with+Label+Propagation+over+Lexical+Links+and+the+Follower+Graph%2C%E2%80%9D+Proc%2E+Conf%2E+Empir%2E+Methods+Nat%2E+Lang%2E+Process%2E)
6. A. Kumar and T. M. Sebastian, “Sentiment Analysis on Twitter,” IJCSI Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 372–378, 2012. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A%2E+Kumar+and+T%2E+M%2E+Sebastian%2C+%E2%80%9CSentiment+Analysis+on+Twitter%2C%E2%80%9D+IJCSI+Int%2E+J%2E+Comput%2E+Sci%2E+Issues%2C+vol%2E+9%2C+no%2E+4%2C+pp%2E+372%E2%80%93378%2C+2012%2E)
7. H. Saif, Y. He, and H. Alani, “Semantic Sentiment Analysis of Twitter,” in The Semantic Web – ISWC 2012, 2012, pp. 508–524. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=H%2E+Saif%2C+Y%2E+He%2C+and+H%2E+Alani%2C+%E2%80%9CSemantic+Sentiment+Analysis+of+Twitter%2C%E2%80%9D+in+The+Semantic+Web+%E2%80%93+ISWC+2012%2C+2012%2C+pp%2E+508%E2%80%93524%2E)
8. A. Shoukry and A. Rafea, “Sentence-level Arabic sentiment analysis,” Collab. Technol. Syst. (CTS), 2012 Int. Conf., pp. 546–550, 2012. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A%2E+Shoukry+and+A%2E+Rafea%2C+%E2%80%9CSentence%2Dlevel+Arabic+sentiment+analysis%2C%E2%80%9D+Collab%2E+Technol%2E+Syst%2E+%28CTS%29%2C+2012+Int%2E+Conf%2E%2C+pp%2E+546%E2%80%93550%2C+2012%2E)
9. J. Ben Salamah and A. Elkhlifi, “Microblogging Opinion Mining Approach for Kuwaiti Dialect,” Int. Conf. Comput. Technol. Inf. Manag., pp. 388–396, 2014. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=J%2E+Ben+Salamah+and+A%2E+Elkhlifi%2C+%E2%80%9CMicroblogging+Opinion+Mining+Approach+for+Kuwaiti+Dialect%2C%E2%80%9D+Int%2E+Conf%2E+Comput%2E+Technol%2E+Inf%2E+Manag%2E%2C+pp%2E+388%E2%80%93396%2C+2014%2E)
10. N. A. Abdulla, N. A. Ahmed, M. A. Shehab, and M. Al-Ayyoub, “Arabic sentiment analysis: Lexicon-based and corpus-based,” in 2013 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT), 2013, pp. 1–6. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=N%2E+A%2E+Abdulla%2C+N%2E+A%2E+Ahmed%2C+M%2E+A%2E+Shehab%2C+and+M%2E+Al%2DAyyoub%2C+%E2%80%9CArabic+sentiment+analysis%3A+Lexicon%2Dbased+and+corpus%2Dbased%2C%E2%80%9D+in+2013+IEEE+Jordan+Conference+on+Applied+Electrical+Engineering+and+Computing+)
11. Y. Kim, “[Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kim-2014-convolutional-neural-networks-sentence-classification/),” Proc. 2014 Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process. (EMNLP 2014), pp. 1746–1751, 2014.
12. B. Pang and L. Lee, “[Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pang-2005-seeing-stars-exploiting-class-relationships/),” in Proceedings of the ACL, 2005. [↗](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.cs/0506075)
13. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, “[Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mikolov-2013-distributed-representations-words-phrases-their/),” Proc. NIPS, pp. 1–9, 2013. [↗](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546)
14. Twitter, “Reporting spam on Twitter,” 2016. [Online]. Available: [https://support.twitter.com/articles/64986](https://support.twitter.com/articles/64986). [Accessed: 17-May-2016]. [↗](https://support.twitter.com/articles/64986)
15. A. Pak and P. Paroubek, “[Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pak-2010-twitter-as-corpus-sentiment-analysis/).,” Lrec, pp. 1320–1326, 2010.
16. S. Ahmed, M. Pasquier, and G. Qadah, “Key issues in conducting sentiment analysis on Arabic social media text,” in 2013 9th International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT), 2013, pp. 72–77. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=S%2E+Ahmed%2C+M%2E+Pasquier%2C+and+G%2E+Qadah%2C+%E2%80%9CKey+issues+in+conducting+sentiment+analysis+on+Arabic+social+media+text%2C%E2%80%9D+in+2013+9th+International+Conference+on+Innovations+in+Information+Technology+%28IIT%29%2C+201)
17. H. Manning, C., Raghavan, P. and Schütze, Introduction to information retrieval, 1st Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=H%2E+Manning%2C+C%2E%2C+Raghavan%2C+P%2E+and+Schu%CC%88tze%2C+Introduction+to+information+retrieval%2C+1st+Ed%2E+New+York%3A+Cambridge+University+Press%2C+2008%2E)
18. scikit-learn developers, “scikit-learn,” 2010. . [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=scikit%2Dlearn+developers%2C+%E2%80%9Cscikit%2Dlearn%2C%E2%80%9D+2010%2E+%2E)
19. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, G. Hinton, L. Y., B. Y., and H. G., “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Y%2E+LeCun%2C+Y%2E+Bengio%2C+G%2E+Hinton%2C+L%2E+Y%2E%2C+B%2E+Y%2E%2C+and+H%2E+G%2E%2C+%E2%80%9CDeep+learning%2C%E2%80%9D+Nature%2C+vol%2E+521%2C+no%2E+7553%2C+pp%2E+436%E2%80%93444%2C+2015%2E)
20. J. Schmidhuber, “Deep Learning in neural networks: An overview,” Neural Networks, vol. 61, pp. 85–117, 2015. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003)

*Updated 1 November 2026*