--- title: "Who cites Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In — 47 citing papers" description: "47 papers of the Elamur Research library cite «Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful», found in their bibliographies…" canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcuschin-2025-chain-thought-reasoning-wild-always/cited-by/" --- [Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcuschin-2025-chain-thought-reasoning-wild-always/cited-by/) [home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not…](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcuschin-2025-chain-thought-reasoning-wild-always/) / cited by # Who cites «Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful» 47 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 19 with a page here, the most cited first · [← back to «Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful»](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcuschin-2025-chain-thought-reasoning-wild-always/) 1. [**Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think arXiv:2505.05410**Yanda Chen, Joe Benton, Ansh Radhakrishnan, et al.*2025 · 106 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/chen-2025-reasoning-models-don-t-always/) 2. [**Phi-4-reasoning Technical Report arXiv:2504.21318**Marah Abdin, Sahaj Agarwal, Ahmed Awadallah, et al.*2025 · 64 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/abdin-2025-phi-4-reasoning-technical-report/) 3. [**Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs arXiv:2506.14245**Xumeng Wen, Zihan Liu, Shun Zheng, et al.*2025 · 62 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wen-2025-reinforcement-learning-verifiable-rewards-implicitly/) 4. [**A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond arXiv:2503.21614**Xiaoye Qu, Yafu Li, Zhao-Chen Su, et al.*2025 · 55 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/qu-2025-survey-efficient-reasoning-large-reasoning/) 5. [**Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter? arXiv:2506.19143**Paul C. Bogdan, Uzay Macar, Neel Nanda, et al.*2025 · 44 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bogdan-2025-thought-anchors-which-llm-reasoning/) 6. **[Dynamic Cheatsheet: Test-Time Learning with Adaptive Memory](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/suzgun-2026-dynamic-cheatsheet-test-time-learning/) [Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/eacl/)**Mirac Suzgun, Mert Yuksekgonul, Federico Bianchi, et al.*2026 · 37 citations* 7. **[A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wang-2025-survey-large-language-models-mathematical/) [ACM Computing Surveys](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acm-computing-surveys/)**Peng-Yuan Wang, Tian-Shuo Liu, Chenyang Wang, et al.*2025 · 26 citations* 8. [**Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models arXiv:2510.25741**Rui-Jie Zhu, Zixuan Wang, Kai Hua, et al.*2025 · 22 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhu-2025-scaling-latent-reasoning-looped-language/) 9. **[A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Performance, Consistency, and Faithfulness Across Languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhao-2026-comprehensive-evaluation-multilingual-chain-thought/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Raoyuan Zhao, Yihong Liu, Hinrich Schuetze, et al.*2026 · 7 citations* 10. **[Is Chain-of-Thought Really Not Explainability? Chain-of-Thought Can Be Faithful without Hint Verbalization](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zaman-2026-is-chain-thought-really-not/) [Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/)**Kerem Zaman, Shashank Srivastava*2026 · 5 citations* 11. **[KnowRL: Exploring Knowledgeable Reinforcement Learning for Factuality](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ren-2026-knowrl-exploring-knowledgeable-reinforcement-learning/) [Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/)**Baochang Ren, Shuofei Qiao, Ningyu Zhang, et al.*2026 · 5 citations* 12. **[Analysing Chain of Thought Dynamics: Active Guidance or Unfaithful Post-hoc Rationalisation?](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lim-2025-analysing-chain-thought-dynamics-active/) [Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/emnlp/)**Samuel Lewis-Lim, Xingwei Tan, Zhixue Zhao, et al.*2025 · 5 citations* 13. **[AutoMonitor-Bench: Evaluating the Reliability of LLM-Based Misbehavior Monitor](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yang-2026-automonitor-bench-evaluating-reliability-llm/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Shu Yang, Jingyu Hu, Tong Li, et al.*2026 · 2 citations* 14. **[C2-Faith: Benchmarking LLM Judges for Causal and Coverage Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mittal-2026-c2-faith-benchmarking-llm-judges/) [Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/gem/)**Avni Mittal, Rauno Arike*2026 · 2 citations* 15. **[LLM Reasoning as Trajectories: Step-Specific Representation Geometry and Correctness Signals](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/sun-2026-llm-reasoning-as-trajectories-step/) [Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/)**Lihao Sun, Hang Dong, Bo Qiao, et al.*2026 · 2 citations* 16. **[A Comprehensive Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness in Persian Classification Tasks](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yazdani-2026-comprehensive-evaluation-chain-thought-faithfulness/) [Workshop on Language Models for Low-Resource Languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/loreslm/)**Shakib Yazdani, Cristina España-Bonet, Eleftherios Avramidis, et al.*2026 · 1 citation* 17. **[SPD-Faith Bench: Diagnosing and Improving Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lv-2026-spd-faith-bench-diagnosing-improving/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Weijiang Lv, Yaoxuan Feng, Xiaobo Xia, et al.*2026 · 1 citation* 18. **[NSF-CoT: Neuro-Symbolic Formal Verification of Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness in Contextual Question Answering](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pramanik-2026-nsf-cot-neuro-symbolic-formal/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Vishal Pramanik, Maisha Maliha, Nathaniel D. Bastian, et al.*2026* 19. **[Teaching Language Models to Forecast Research Success Through Comparative Idea Evaluation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mule-2026-teaching-language-models-forecast-research/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Srujan P Mule, Aniketh Garikaparthi, Manasi Patwardhan*2026* 28 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet. - [← back to](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arcuschin-2025-chain-thought-reasoning-wild-always/) — Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful