---
title: "Noun Layers in Old English — paper by Arista (2014)"
description: "The work offers a lexicon-wide explanation where earlier diachronic, dialectal and textual studies gave… 22 references, cited by 2 papers here."
authors: ["Javier Martín Arista"]
year: 2014
venue: "NJES: Nordic Journal of English studies 13"
source: "https://publicera.kb.se/njes/article/view/27181"
doi: "10.35360/njes.324"
licence: "CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; NJES: Nordic Journal of English studies)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arista-2014-noun-layers-old-english-mismatches/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arista-2014-noun-layers-old-english-mismatches/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2014](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2014/page/3/) / Noun Layers in Old English: Mismatches and Asymmetry in Lexical Derivation

# Noun Layers in Old English: Mismatches and Asymmetry in Lexical Derivation

**Authors:** [Javier Martín Arista](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/javier-martin-arista/) · **Year:** 2014 · **Venue:** [NJES: Nordic Journal of English studies 13](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/nordic-journal-of-english-studies/) ([Nordic Journal of English Studies 2014](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/nordic-journal-of-english-studies/2014/)) · **Publisher:** [University of Gothenburg](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/publishers/university-of-gothenburg/) · **Licence:** [CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; NJES: Nordic Journal of English studies)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.324) · [PDF](https://publicera.kb.se/njes/article/download/27181/22114) · [DOI 10.35360/njes.324](https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.324) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W1566848299)

**Citations:** 19 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) · [2](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/arista-2014-noun-layers-old-english-mismatches/cited-by/) in our library, of the 141,840 papers whose bibliographies we read

## Summary
The paper looks at a puzzle in Old English word-formation. Many nouns are built from the same root with different derivational means, yet they mean nearly the same thing. Examples are several competing forms for 'contradiction', 'redemption' or 'change'. This breaks the usual expectation that a new form carries a new meaning. Martín Arista calls such cases form-function mismatches. He argues they only become visible when derivatives are compared as a paradigm, not studied one at a time along the syntagmatic axis.

The data are types drawn from the standard Old English dictionaries through the Nerthus lexical database. Derivations are reconstructed step by step, adding at most one morpheme per step. The author finds two kinds of mismatch: suffixes competing on the same base, and different bases competing for the same suffix. He also identifies four asymmetries: process, category, productivity and recursivity.

He interprets these patterns as traces of two successive waves of word-formation. The first is zero derivation and the second is affixation, including recursive affixation. Together they form two layers in the Old English lexicon. The work offers a lexicon-wide explanation where earlier diachronic, dialectal and textual studies gave only partial accounts.

## Key points
- The data come from type analysis of Bosworth–Toller, Sweet and Clark Hall, as compiled in the Nerthus database (www.nerthusproject.com).
- Contrasts are classified by where they occur in the derivation:
  - **Final contrasts** set affix against affix (e.g. -nes vs -ing in oncunnes / oncunning) or affix against zero (healding / hield).
  - **Non-final contrasts** set base against base (wiðercwedol- vs wiðercwiden-).
- Typical near-synonym pairs fall into three kinds:
  - a zero derivative against an affixed one;
  - a more productive affix against a less productive one;
  - a more recursive formation against a less recursive one.
- Convergent derivation is mainly tied to feminine nouns in -nes. Adjectives show redundant derivation instead, especially -ful vs -fullic pairs.
- Earlier work is reviewed as background:
  - diachronic: Bede's past-participle-based forms vs Ælfric's infinitive-based frætwung;
  - dialectal: -estre absent in Anglian, -icge absent in West-Saxon;
  - textual: pairs from the two versions of Wærferth and from three psalters.

## Interesting ideas
- Mismatches only surface when all derivatives of a root are compared side by side, so the root family should be the unit of analysis rather than the single word.
- Each derivation is broken into steps that add exactly one morpheme, which makes every derivation a traceable chain of minimal steps.
- Splitting competition into final contrasts (rival affixes) and non-final contrasts (rival bases) shows exactly where two near-synonymous forms diverge.
- Variation can be described along separate dimensions of asymmetry (process, category, productivity, recursivity) instead of a single similarity score.

## For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

- **I1** (world): Grouping lexemes by root with explicit derivation links would let the ontology spot near-synonym clusters (e.g. several nominalizations of one verb) and map them to one concept node.
- **I2** (tokens): The morphology module in crate en could output lemma derivations as one-affix-per-step chains, so each analysis of a word like "unbelievingness" is fully explainable.
- **I3** (world): When two nominalizations seem to compete, recording whether they differ in suffix or in base helps decide whether to merge them as variants or keep them as distinct concepts.
- **I4** (learn): Evaluations of lemma and derivation errors could be broken down along these four axes, showing whether failures come from zero-derived forms, rare affixes, or deeply stacked suffixes.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

## Institutions

- [Universidad de La Rioja](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/universidad-de-la-rioja/) — University, Logroño, Spain · 13 works · 74 citations

📚 Shelves (2): [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 9,296 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 9,206 works

🧭 Topics (2): [English](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/english/) · 1,373 works · [⏳ Historical linguistics & language change](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/language-change/) · 159 works

## Cite

Cite as: Javier Martín Arista. 2014. Noun Layers in Old English: Mismatches and Asymmetry in Lexical Derivation. NJES: Nordic Journal of English studies 13.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@article{arista2014noun,
  title = {{Noun Layers in Old English: Mismatches and Asymmetry in Lexical Derivation}},
  author = {Javier Martín Arista},
  journal = {NJES: Nordic Journal of English studies 13},
  year = {2014},
  doi = {10.35360/njes.324},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.324}
}
```

- [← previous Left Dislocation in Biblical Hebrew: A Cognitive Linguistic Account](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/westbury-2014-left-dislocation-biblical-hebrew-cognitive/)
- [next → A Generic Anaphora Resolution Engine for Indian Languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/devi-2014-generic-anaphora-resolution-engine-indian/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2014](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2014/page/3/)

## References

22 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Booij, G. 2010. Morphological constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Booij%2C+G%2E+2010%2E+Morphological+constructions%2E+Oxford%3A+Oxford+University+Press%2E)
2. Bosworth, J. and T. N. Toller 1973 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bosworth%2C+J%2E+and+T%2E+N%2E+Toller+1973+%281898%29%2E+An+Anglo%2DSaxon+Dictionary%2E+Oxford%3A+Oxford+University+Press%2E)
3. Brinton, L. J. and E. Closs-Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615962)
4. Brown, D. and A. Hippisley. 2012. Network Morphology: a defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Brown%2C+D%2E+and+A%2E+Hippisley%2E+2012%2E+Network+Morphology%3A+a+defaults%2Dbased+theory+of+word+structure%2E+Cambridge+University+Press%2E)
5. Clark Hall, J. R. 1996 (1896). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. de la Cruz, J. 1975. “Old English Pure Prefixes: Structure and Function.” Linguistics 13: 47-82. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Clark+Hall%2C+J%2E+R%2E+1996+%281896%29%2E+A+Concise+Anglo%2DSaxon+Dictionary%2E+Toronto%3A+University+of+Toronto+Press%2E+de+la+Cruz%2C+J%2E+1975%2E+%E2%80%9COld+English+Pure+Prefixes%3A+Structure+and+Function%2E%E2%80%9D+Linguistics+13%3A+47%2D82%2E)
6. Givón, T. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1075/z.146)
7. Haselow, A. 2010. Typological Changes in the Lexicon. Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Healey, A. diPaolo (ed.) with J. Price Wilkins and X. Xiang. 2004. The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238211)
8. Hiltunen, R. 1983. The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb. Turku: Turun Yliopisto. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hiltunen%2C+R%2E+1983%2E+The+Decline+of+the+Prefixes+and+the+Beginnings+of+the+English+Phrasal+Verb%2E+Turku%3A+Turun+Yliopisto%2E)
9. Hopper, P. and E. Closs-Traugott. 2003 (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press. 186 Javier Martín Arista Kastovsky, D. 1968. Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by means of a Zero Morpheme. Ph.D. dissertation. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hopper%2C+P%2E+and+E%2E+Closs%2DTraugott%2E+2003+%281993%29%2E+Grammaticalization%2E+Cambridge%3A+Cambrige+University+Press%2E+186+Javier+Mart%C3%ADn+Arista+Kastovsky%2C+D%2E+1968%2E+Old+English+Deverbal+Substantives+Derived+by+means)
10. Kastovsky, D. 1992. “Semantics and Vocabulary.” The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Ed. R. M. Hogg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290-408. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521264747.006)
11. Lass, R. 1994. Old English: a Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lass%2C+R%2E+1994%2E+Old+English%3A+a+Historical+Linguistic+Companion%2E+Cambridge%3A+Cambridge+University+Press%2E)
12. Lieber, R. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lieber%2C+R%2E+2004%2E+Morphology+and+Lexical+Semantics%2E+Cambridge%3A+Cambridge+University+Press%2E)
13. Lindemann, J. W. R. 1965. “Old English preverbal ge-: a re-examination of some current do.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 64: 65-83. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lindemann%2C+J%2E+W%2E+R%2E+1965%2E+%E2%80%9COld+English+preverbal+ge%2D%3A+a+re%2Dexamination+of+some+current+do%2E%E2%80%9D+Journal+of+English+and+Germanic+Philology+64%3A+65%2D83%2E)
14. Martín Arista, J. 2012 “The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 32/4: 411-433. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2012.744264)
15. Ogura, M. 1995. “The interchangeability of Old English verbal prefixes.” Anglo-Saxon England 24: 67-93. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1017/s026367510000466x)
16. Pounder, A. 2000. Processes and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110814378)
17. Schabram, H. 1973. “Das altenglische superbia-Wortgut. Eine Nachlese.” Festschrift Prof. Dr. Herbert Koziol zum siebzigsten Geburstag. Eds. G. Bauer, F.K. Stanzel and F. Zaic. Vienna: Wilhelm Braumüller. 272-279. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Schabram%2C+H%2E+1973%2E+%E2%80%9CDas+altenglische+superbia%2DWortgut%2E+Eine+Nachlese%2E%E2%80%9D+Festschrift+Prof%2E+Dr%2E+Herbert+Koziol+zum+siebzigsten+Geburstag%2E+Eds%2E+G%2E+Bauer%2C+F%2EK%2E+Stanzel+and+F%2E+Zaic%2E+Vienna%3A+Wilhelm+Braum%C3%BCll)
18. Schreiber, C. 2003. “Dialects in Contact in Ninth-Century England.” Bookmarks from the Past. Studies in Early English Language and Literature in Honour of Helmut Gneuss. Eds. L. Kornexl and U. Lenker. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang. 1-31. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Schreiber%2C+C%2E+2003%2E+%E2%80%9CDialects+in+Contact+in+Ninth%2DCentury+England%2E%E2%80%9D+Bookmarks+from+the+Past%2E+Studies+in+Early+English+Language+and+Literature+in+Honour+of+Helmut+Gneuss%2E+Eds%2E+L%2E+Kornexl+and+U%2E+Lenker%2E)
19. Sweet, H. 1976 (1896). The Student´s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. van Marle, J. 1985. On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological creativity. Dordrecht: Foris. von Lindheim, B. 1958. “Die Weiblichen Genussufixe.” Anglia: Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 76: 479-504. von Lindheim, B. 1972. “Das Suffix -bære in Altenglischen.” Archiv für das Studium der neuren Sprachen und Literaturen 208: 310-320. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sweet%2C+H%2E+1976+%281896%29%2E+The+Student%C2%B4s+Dictionary+of+Anglo%2DSaxon%2E+Cambridge%3A+Cambridge+University+Press%2E+van+Marle%2C+J%2E+1985%2E+On+the+paradigmatic+dimension+of+morphological+creativity%2E+Dordrecht%3A+Foris%2E+)
20. Wenisch, F. 1979. Spezifisch anglisches Wortgut in den nordhumbrischen interlinearglossierungen des Lukasevangeliums. Heidelberg: Winter. Noun Layers in Old English Weyhe, H. 1911. Zu den altenglischen Verbalabstrakten auf ‘-nes’ und ‘-ing / -ung’. Halle: Max Niemeyer. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wenisch%2C+F%2E+1979%2E+Spezifisch+anglisches+Wortgut+in+den+nordhumbrischen+interlinearglossierungen+des+Lukasevangeliums%2E+Heidelberg%3A+Winter%2E+Noun+Layers+in+Old+English+Weyhe%2C+H%2E+1911%2E+Zu+den+altenglische)
21. Wiesenekker, H. 1991. Word be Worde, Andgit of Andgite. Translation performance of the Old English interlinear glosses of the Vespasian, Regius and Lambeth psalters. Huizen: Bout & Zn. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wiesenekker%2C+H%2E+1991%2E+Word+be+Worde%2C+Andgit+of+Andgite%2E+Translation+performance+of+the+Old+English+interlinear+glosses+of+the+Vespasian%2C+Regius+and+Lambeth+psalters%2E+Huizen%3A+Bout+%26+Zn%2E)
22. Yerkes, D. 1979. The two versions of Wærferth´s translation of Gregory’s Dialogues: an Old English thesaurus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Yerkes%2C+D%2E+1979%2E+The+two+versions+of+W%C3%A6rferth%C2%B4s+translation+of+Gregory%E2%80%99s+Dialogues%3A+an+Old+English+thesaurus%2E+Toronto%3A+University+of+Toronto+Press%2E)

*Updated 24 October 2026*