---
title: "Who cites Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: — 11 citing papers"
description: "11 papers of the Elamur Research library cite «Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?»…"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/beel-2025-evaluating-sakana-s-ai/cited-by/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/beel-2025-evaluating-sakana-s-ai/cited-by/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims…](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/beel-2025-evaluating-sakana-s-ai/) / cited by

# Who cites «Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?»

11 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · [← back to «Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?»](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/beel-2025-evaluating-sakana-s-ai/)

1. [**The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search arXiv:2504.08066**Yutaro Yamada, Robert Tjarko Lange, Cong Lu, et al.*2025 · 129 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yamada-2025-ai-scientist-v2-workshop/)
2. **[AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/chen-2025-ai4research-survey-artificial-intelligence/) [Science China Information Sciences](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/science-china-information-sciences/)**Qiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.*2025 · 21 citations*
3. [**SciIntegrity-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Academic Integrity in AI Scientist Systems arXiv:2605.10246**Zonglin Yang, Xingtong Liu, Xinyan Xu*2026 · 4 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yang-2026-sciintegrity-bench-benchmark-evaluating/)
4. **[Is This Idea Novel? An Automated Benchmark for Judgment of Research Ideas](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/schopf-2026-is-this-idea-novel-automated/) [Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/lrec/)**Tim Schopf, Michael Färber*2026 · 1 citation*
5. [**Position: Correct Answer, Wrong Mechanism — When AI Scientists Defend General Claims Their Own Data Contradicts arXiv:2606.23175**Steven Young Eulig*2026 · 1 citation*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/eulig-2026-position-correct-answer-wrong/)

6 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

- [← back to](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/beel-2025-evaluating-sakana-s-ai/) — Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?