---
title: "Glen, Glenda or Glendale — paper by Bergsma et al. (2009)"
description: "English third-person pronouns signal gender and number, so a pronoun resolver can… 95.5% accuracy. 30 references, cited by 6 papers here."
authors: ["Shane Bergsma", "Dekang Lin", "Randy Goebel"]
year: 2009
venue: "Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2009)"
source: "https://aclanthology.org/W09-1116/"
licence: "CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (ACL Anthology, before 2016)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bergsma-2009-glen-glenda-or-glendale-unsupervised/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bergsma-2009-glen-glenda-or-glendale-unsupervised/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2009](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2009/page/2/) / Glen, Glenda or Glendale: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Learning of English Noun Gender

# Glen, Glenda or Glendale: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Learning of English Noun Gender

**Authors:** [Shane Bergsma](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/shane-bergsma/), [Dekang Lin](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/dekang-lin/) and Randy Goebel · **Year:** 2009 · **Venue:** [Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2009)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/conll/) ([CoNLL 2009](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/conll/2009/)) · **Publisher:** [Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/publishers/association-for-computational-linguistics/) · **Licence:** [CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (ACL Anthology, before 2016)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://aclanthology.org/W09-1116/) · [PDF](https://aclanthology.org/W09-1116.pdf) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W1966875675)

**Citations:** 7 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) · [6](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bergsma-2009-glen-glenda-or-glendale-unsupervised/cited-by/) in our library, of the 149,439 papers whose bibliographies we read

## Summary
English third-person pronouns signal gender and number, so a pronoun resolver can discard candidate nouns that do not match. Earlier gender models counted how often each noun type co-occurred with pronouns of each class. Rare and unseen nouns therefore got no reliable estimate. Ambiguous types such as *lawyer* or *Ford* were also given a single label regardless of context.

The authors do not use these counts as the final answer. Instead they filter the Bergsma and Lin (2006) gender database down to a set of very reliable "pseudo-seed" nouns. They find occurrences of these nouns in about a million documents and use the seed genders to auto-label training data for a 4-way discriminative classifier (masculine, feminine, neutral, plural). All mentions of a noun within one document are classified together, using context features and type-level features (morphological and categorical cues).

A semi-supervised variant combines the classifier's output with the original counts, tuned on a small labeled set. It reaches 95.5% accuracy, roughly halving the error of the prior state of the art. The method needs no manual labels to train the base model and can handle unseen words.

## Key points
- **Base resource:** the path-based gender database of Bergsma and Lin (2006). It lists masculine, feminine, neutral and plural pronoun counts for 3.1 million lower-cased nouns. A log-count classifier over this database serves as the baseline, PATHGENDER.
- **Pseudo-seed filtering:** nouns are kept only if they have at least 50 counts, their most-frequent pronoun gender (MFPG) covers at least 85% of those counts, and their database-to-web count ratio clears a threshold. About 45 thousand seed nouns remain.
- **Training examples:**
  - Noun mentions are grouped by lower-case string within each document, with ±5 tokens of context per mention.
  - At most 200 groups are kept per noun string, so frequent nouns do not dominate.
  - Only features seen more than 5 times are retained.
- **Main result:** FULL-SEMI achieves 95.5% accuracy on 2596 test nouns, a 50% error reduction over prior work.
- **Post-processing:** a surname-matching step raises FULL-SEMI to 96.7%, PATHGENDER to 93.3% and PATHGENDER+ to 94.3%. Remaining errors include collective nouns such as *United States*, *group* and *public*, which were labeled plural but predicted neutral.

## Interesting ideas
- An imperfect, sparse statistical resource is used as a labeler rather than as the final model: only its most confident entries become training labels for a richer classifier that generalizes to rare and unseen items.
- Seed reliability is checked by comparing how often a word appears in the coreference database with how often it appears on the web. Words that are frequent overall but rarely act as antecedents (like *importance*) get flagged as untrustworthy, which hints at how "referential" a noun is.
- All mentions of the same noun string in a document are pooled into one composite vector, relying on the one-sense-per-discourse tendency. This yields one consistent decision per entity and more context evidence.
- Gender is treated as a property of the referent in context, not of the word type. The same noun (*lawyer*, *Ford*) can therefore get different classes in different documents.
- A cheap name-matching post-processor lets a later short mention (a surname) inherit the gender of an earlier full name. It helped every system tested.

## For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

- **I1** (learn): Mova's silver-data pipeline could keep only entries where witness parsers or count statistics agree strongly, then train a feature-rich model that also covers words the statistics never saw.
- **I2** (frames): the coreference component could use a similar ratio as a prior for whether a noun is a plausible pronoun antecedent at all, pruning candidates before agreement checks.
- **I3** (world): when building the entity list of a text, gender, number and type evidence from every mention could be pooled into one entity record, so a single clear cue (e.g. *he says*) settles the entity throughout the story.
- **I4** (world): entity attributes like gender or animacy should live on the text's entities with their evidence chain, with lexicon defaults used only as overridable priors, which keeps decisions explainable.
- **I5** (frames): coreference could add an explicit rule linking surname mentions to earlier full names and copying agreement features, a transparent step that is easy to explain in the answer trace.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

## Institutions

- [Google](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/companies/google/) — Company, Mountain View, United States · 492 works · 440,463 citations
- [University of Alberta](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/university-of-alberta/) — University, Edmonton, Canada · 51 works · 5,017 citations

📚 Shelves (4): [🖥️ Computer Science](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/) · 18,614 works · [🤖 Artificial Intelligence](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/) · 17,965 works · [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 17,450 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 17,296 works

🧭 Topics (1): [English](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/english/) · 2,379 works

## Cite

Cite as: Shane Bergsma, Dekang Lin and Randy Goebel. 2009. Glen, Glenda or Glendale: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Learning of English Noun Gender. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2009).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{bergsma2009glen,
  title = {{Glen, Glenda or Glendale: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Learning of English Noun Gender}},
  author = {Shane Bergsma, Dekang Lin and Randy Goebel},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2009)},
  year = {2009},
  doi = {10.3115/1596374.1596396},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3115/1596374.1596396}
}
```

- [← previous Free choice for all: a response to Emmanuel Chemla](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/geurts-2009-free-choice-all-response-emmanuel/)
- [next → Multi-word expressions in textual inference: Much ado about nothing?](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marneffe-2009-multi-word-expressions-textual-inference/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2009](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2009/page/2/)

## References

30 references, 11 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Shane Bergsma and Dekang Lin. 2006. [Bootstrapping path-based pronoun resolution](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bergsma-2006-bootstrapping-path-based-pronoun-resolution/). In COLING-ACL, pages 33–40.
2. Shane Bergsma. 2005. Automatic acquisition of gender information for anaphora resolution. In Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 342–353. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shane+Bergsma%2E+2005%2E+Automatic+acquisition+of+gender+information+for+anaphora+resolution%2E+In+Canadian+Conference+on+Artificial+Intelligence%2C+pages+342%E2%80%93353%2E)
3. Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. [Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/blum-1998-combining-labeled-unlabeled-data-co-training/). In COLT, pages 92–100. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1184/r1/6604187)
4. Sergey Brin. 1998. Extracting patterns and relations from the world wide web. In WebDB Workshop at 6th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, pages 172–183. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sergey+Brin%2E+1998%2E+Extracting+patterns+and+relations+from+the+world+wide+web%2E+In+WebDB+Workshop+at+6th+International+Conference+on+Extending+Database+Technology%2C+pages+172%E2%80%93183%2E)
5. Razvan Bunescu and Raymond J. Mooney. 2004. Collective information extraction with relational Markov networks. In ACL, pages 438–445. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Razvan+Bunescu+and+Raymond+J%2E+Mooney%2E+2004%2E+Collective+information+extraction+with+relational+Markov+networks%2E+In+ACL%2C+pages+438%E2%80%93445%2E)
6. Eugene Charniak and Micha Elsner. 2009. [EM works for pronoun anaphora resolution](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/charniak-2009-em-works-pronoun-anaphora-resolution/). In EACL.
7. Colin Cherry and Shane Bergsma. 2005. [An expectation maximization approach to pronoun resolution](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/cherry-2005-expectation-maximization-approach-pronoun-resolution/). In CoNLL, pages 88–95.
8. Michael Collins and Yoram Singer. 1999. [Unsupervised models for named entity classification](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/collins-1999-unsupervised-models-named-entity-classification/). In EMNLP-VLC, pages 100–110.
9. Koby Crammer and Yoram Singer. 2001. On the algorithmic implementation of multiclass kernel-based vector machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:265–292. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Koby+Crammer+and+Yoram+Singer%2E+2001%2E+On+the+algorithmic+implementation+of+multiclass+kernel%2Dbased+vector+machines%2E+Journal+of+Machine+Learning+Research%2C+2%3A265%E2%80%93292%2E)
10. Silviu Cucerzan and David Yarowsky. 1999. Language independent named entity recognition combining morphological and contextual evidence. In EMNLP-VLC, pages 90–99. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Silviu+Cucerzan+and+David+Yarowsky%2E+1999%2E+Language+independent+named+entity+recognition+combining+morphological+and+contextual+evidence%2E+In+EMNLP%2DVLC%2C+pages+90%E2%80%9399%2E)
11. Silviu Cucerzan and David Yarowsky. 2003. Minimally supervised induction of grammatical gender. In NAACL, pages 40–47. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Silviu+Cucerzan+and+David+Yarowsky%2E+2003%2E+Minimally+supervised+induction+of+grammatical+gender%2E+In+NAACL%2C+pages+40%E2%80%9347%2E)
12. Hal Daumé III and Daniel Marcu. 2006. Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26:101–126. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1872)
13. Pascal Denis and Jason Baldridge. 2007. Joint determination of anaphoricity and coreference using integer programming. In NAACL-HLT, pages 236–243. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Pascal+Denis+and+Jason+Baldridge%2E+2007%2E+Joint+determination+of+anaphoricity+and+coreference+using+integer+programming%2E+In+NAACL%2DHLT%2C+pages+236%E2%80%93243%2E)
14. Oren Etzioni, Michael Cafarella, Doug Downey, Ana-Maria Popescu, Tal Shaked, Stephen Soderland, Daniel S. Weld, and Alexander Yates. 2005. Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the web: an experimental study. Artif. Intell., 165(1):91–134. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2005.03.001)
15. Richard Evans and Constantin Orăsan. 2000. Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts. In DAARC, pages 154–162. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Richard+Evans+and+Constantin+Ora%CC%86san%2E+2000%2E+Improving+anaphora+resolution+by+identifying+animate+entities+in+texts%2E+In+DAARC%2C+pages+154%E2%80%93162%2E)
16. Michael Fleischman, Eduard Hovy, and Abdessamad Echihabi. 2003. Offline strategies for online question answering: answering questions before they are asked. In ACL, pages 1–7. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Michael+Fleischman%2C+Eduard+Hovy%2C+and+Abdessamad+Echihabi%2E+2003%2E+Offline+strategies+for+online+question+answering%3A+answering+questions+before+they+are+asked%2E+In+ACL%2C+pages+1%E2%80%937%2E)
17. Niyu Ge, John Hale, and Eugene Charniak. 1998. [A statistical approach to anaphora resolution](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ge-1998-statistical-approach-anaphora-resolution/). In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 161–171.
18. Andrew R. Golding and Dan Roth. 1999. A Winnow-based approach to context-sensitive spelling correction. Machine Learning, 34(1-3):107–130. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007545901558)
19. Jan Hajič and Barbora Hladká. 1997. Probabilistic and rule-based tagger of an inflective language: a comparison. In ANLP, pages 111–118. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jan+Hajic%CC%8C+and+Barbora+Hladka%CC%81%2E+1997%2E+Probabilistic+and+rule%2Dbased+tagger+of+an+inflective+language%3A+a+comparison%2E+In+ANLP%2C+pages+111%E2%80%93118%2E)
20. Sanda Harabagiu, Razvan Bunescu, and Steven Maiorano. 2001. Text and knowledge mining for coreference resolution. In NAACL, pages 55–62. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sanda+Harabagiu%2C+Razvan+Bunescu%2C+and+Steven+Maiorano%2E+2001%2E+Text+and+knowledge+mining+for+coreference+resolution%2E+In+NAACL%2C+pages+55%E2%80%9362%2E)
21. Nancy Ide and Keith Suderman. 2004. The American National Corpus first release. In LREC, pages 1681– 84. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nancy+Ide+and+Keith+Suderman%2E+2004%2E+The+American+National+Corpus+first+release%2E+In+LREC%2C+pages+1681%E2%80%93+84%2E)
22. Christopher Kennedy and Branimir Boguraev. 1996. [Anaphora for everyone: Pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kennedy-1996-anaphora-everyone-pronominal-anaphora-resolution/). In COLING, pages 113–118.
23. Shalom Lappin and Herbert J. Leass. 1994. [An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lappin-1994-algorithm-pronominal-anaphora-resolution/). Computational Linguistics, 20(4):535–561. [↗](https://doi.org/10.5555/203987.203989)
24. Dekang Lin. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of MINIPAR. In LREC Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dekang+Lin%2E+1998%2E+Dependency%2Dbased+evaluation+of+MINIPAR%2E+In+LREC+Workshop+on+the+Evaluation+of+Parsing+Systems%2E)
25. Patrick Pantel and Deepak Ravichandran. 2004. [Automatically labeling semantic classes](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pantel-2004-automatically-labeling-semantic-classes/). In HLT-NAACL, pages 321–328.
26. Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2005. Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery. In NIPS, pages 1297–1304. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rion+Snow%2C+Daniel+Jurafsky%2C+and+Andrew+Y%2E+Ng%2E+2005%2E+Learning+syntactic+patterns+for+automatic+hypernym+discovery%2E+In+NIPS%2C+pages+1297%E2%80%931304%2E)
27. Wee Meng Soon, Hwee Tou Ng, and Daniel Chung Yong Lim. 2001. [A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/soon-2001-machine-learning-approach-coreference-resolution/). Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521–544. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1162/089120101753342653)
28. Ioannis Tsochantaridis, Thomas Hofmann, Thorsten Joachims, and Yasemin Altun. 2004. Support vector machine learning for interdependent and structured output spaces. In ICML. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ioannis+Tsochantaridis%2C+Thomas+Hofmann%2C+Thorsten+Joachims%2C+and+Yasemin+Altun%2E+2004%2E+Support+vector+machine+learning+for+interdependent+and+structured+output+spaces%2E+In+ICML%2E)
29. Ellen Vorhees. 2002. Overview of the TREC 2002 question answering track. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ellen+Vorhees%2E+2002%2E+Overview+of+the+TREC+2002+question+answering+track%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+Eleventh+Text+REtrieval+Conference+%28TREC%29%2E)
30. David Yarowsky. 1995. [Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yarowsky-1995-unsupervised-word-sense-disambiguation-rivaling/). In ACL, pages 189–196.

*Updated 1 November 2026*
