--- title: "The text-critical and exegetical value of the Dead Sea Scrolls — Cook 2016" description: "Cook asks how much the Qumran biblical manuscripts actually contribute to textual criticism and interpretation of the Hebrew Bible. 16 references." authors: ["Johann Cook"] year: 2016 venue: "HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72" source: "https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/3280" doi: "10.4102/hts.v72i4.3280" licence: "CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies)" licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License" canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/cook-2016-text-critical-exegetical-value-dead/" --- [Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/cook-2016-text-critical-exegetical-value-dead/) [home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2016](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2016/page/4/) / The text-critical and exegetical value of the Dead Sea Scrolls # The text-critical and exegetical value of the Dead Sea Scrolls **Authors:** Johann Cook · **Year:** 2016 · **Venue:** HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72 · **Licence:** [CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) **Links:** [Publisher's page](https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3280) · [PDF](https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/download/3280/7413) · [DOI 10.4102/hts.v72i4.3280](https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3280) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W2480256853) **Citations:** 2 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) ## Summary Cook asks how much the Qumran biblical manuscripts actually contribute to textual criticism and interpretation of the Hebrew Bible. He assumes that several text forms circulated before the common era, so the Masoretic Text (MT) is one witness among many. He still uses it as the comparison baseline, citing MT from BHS, the Septuagint (LXX) from the Rahlfs edition, and 1QIsa a from DJD 32. He sorts the evidence into three groups: - **Close to MT.** 1QIsa a looks like MT Isaiah, but counts of full ("plene") versus short ("defective") spellings, drawn from an electronic Qumran database and Logos 6, show the scroll splitting at chapter 33. This supports the theory that it was copied in two halves. - **Uninformative.** The few fragments of Proverbs and Job are too scanty to settle open questions, such as the different chapter order in LXX Proverbs. - **Decisive.** Fragments of Genesis 1 (4QGen h) and Jeremiah (4QJer d, 4QJer a) attest Hebrew source texts behind the Septuagint, including its shorter text and different sequence. Cook concludes that fragments vary greatly in value and must be weighed individually. ## Key points - The particle כי occurs 323 times in 1QIsa a, against 328 in the Textus Receptus. The full spelling, which never appears in BHS, is used 194 times and the short one 129 times. - In chapters 1–33 the short form of כי appears 123 times and the full form 34. In chapters 34–66 the short form appears only 4 times and the full form 159. - The interrogative מי is spelled fully in 23 of its 63 occurrences, all from chapter 33 onward. 1QIsa b uses short spellings throughout, which points to different scribes. - A three-line blank after chapter 33 was Giese's main argument for dividing 1QIsa a into two parts. - Cook reconstructs Genesis 1 as a six-part formula: word report, its closing, deed report, naming, its closing, and the day-ending. He notes that six days carry eight works and that several days lack some of the slots. ## Interesting ideas - Counting how a spelling variant is distributed across a long document can reveal where one copyist stopped and another began, turning tiny orthographic habits into evidence about where a text came from. - One reference text can serve as the comparison baseline without being treated as the true or best version, since it is only one witness among several. - Cook separates small differences that come from free translation choices from differences that reflect a genuinely different source, so not every divergence counts as a real variant. - An ideal template with fixed slots, compared against each actual instance, makes missing or extra slots stand out as meaningful clues rather than noise. - Some evidence is simply too thin to decide a question, and a reconstruction resting on it stays a hypothesis. ## For Mova How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests: - **I1** (tokens): The tokenizer could log spelling-variant frequencies per segment (e.g. British vs American forms) to flag texts stitched from several sources before tagging. - **I2** (learn): In silver data built from witness parsers, one parser can serve as the alignment anchor while disagreements are still judged on their merits rather than defaulting to the anchor. - **I3** (back): When checking text → graph → text or translation output, divergences could be classified as harmless rewording versus actual meaning change, and only the latter scored as errors. - **I4** (frames): Event frames could carry an expected slot pattern, and gaps (e.g. a narrated act with no stated outcome) could be surfaced explicitly for implicature and world-building. - **I5** (answer): Readers could output "cannot be determined from the text" when the supporting graph is fragmentary, instead of forcing a guess, and evaluation could reward correct abstention. *Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.* Fields: [Linguistics & languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/linguistics/) Topics: [🕎 Hebrew & Aramaic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/hebrew-aramaic/) ## Institutions - [Stellenbosch University](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/stellenbosch-university/) — University, Stellenbosch, South Africa · 13 works · 24,025 citations ## Cite Cite as: Johann Cook. 2016. The text-critical and exegetical value of the Dead Sea Scrolls. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72. The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. ```bibtex @article{cook2016text, title = {{The text-critical and exegetical value of the Dead Sea Scrolls}}, author = {Johann Cook}, journal = {HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72}, year = {2016}, doi = {10.4102/hts.v72i4.3280}, url = {https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3280} } ``` - [← previous Syntactic Variation in Masoretic Hebrew: The Object Clause Reconsidered](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/naaijer-2017-syntactic-variation-masoretic-hebrew-object/) - [next → An Alternative Approach to the Lexicon of Late Biblical Hebrew](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/rezetko-2016-alternative-approach-lexicon-late-biblical/) - [↑ back to papers of 2016](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2016/page/4/) ## References 16 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet. 1. Schmidt, W.H., 1964, Die Schöpfungsgeschichte der Priesterschrift, WMANT, 17, Neukirchener Verlag Neukirchen-Vluyn. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Schmidt%2C+W%2EH%2E%2C+1964%2C+Die+Sch%C3%B6pfungsgeschichte+der+Priesterschrift%2C+WMANT%2C+17%2C+Neukirchener+Verlag+Neukirchen%2DVluyn%2E) 2. Abegg, M., 1990, The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible. The oldest known Bible translated for the first time into English, Harpers, San Francisco, CA. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abegg%2C+M%2E%2C+1990%2C+The+Dead+Sea+Scrolls+Bible%2E+The+oldest+known+Bible+translated+for+the+first+time+into+English%2C+Harpers%2C+San+Francisco%2C+CA%2E) 3. Skehan, P.W., E. Ulrich, J.E. Sanderson, M.C. Douglas, 1992, ‘4QpaleoJobc’, in Qumran Cave 4 IV Palaeo-Hebrew and Greek Biblical Manuscripts, pp. 155–157, Oxford University Press, Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Skehan%2C+P%2EW%2E%2C+E%2E+Ulrich%2C+J%2EE%2E+Sanderson%2C+M%2EC%2E+Douglas%2C+1992%2C+%E2%80%984QpaleoJobc%E2%80%99%2C+in+Qumran+Cave+4+IV+Palaeo%2DHebrew+and+Greek+Biblical+Manuscripts%2C+pp%2E+155%E2%80%93157%2C+Oxford+University+Press%2C+Oxford%2E) 4. Andersen, F.L. & Forbes, A.D., 1986, Spelling in the Hebrew Bible, Biblical Institute Press, Rome. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andersen%2C+F%2EL%2E+%26+Forbes%2C+A%2ED%2E%2C+1986%2C+Spelling+in+the+Hebrew+Bible%2C+Biblical+Institute+Press%2C+Rome%2E) 5. Barr, J., 1989, The variable spellings of the Hebrew Bible, the Schweich Lectures 1986, Alden Press, Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Barr%2C+J%2E%2C+1989%2C+The+variable+spellings+of+the+Hebrew+Bible%2C+the+Schweich+Lectures+1986%2C+Alden+Press%2C+Oxford%2E) 6. Brown, W., 1993, Structure, role, and ideology in the Hebrew and Greek texts of Genesis 1:1–2:3. SBLDS 132, Scholars Press, Atlanta, GA. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Brown%2C+W%2E%2C+1993%2C+Structure%2C+role%2C+and+ideology+in+the+Hebrew+and+Greek+texts+of+Genesis+1%3A1%E2%80%932%3A3%2E+SBLDS+132%2C+Scholars+Press%2C+Atlanta%2C+GA%2E) 7. Brown, W., 1999, ‘Reassessing the text-critical value of Genesis 1: A response to Martin Rösel’, BIOSCS 32, 35–39. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Brown%2C+W%2E%2C+1999%2C+%E2%80%98Reassessing+the+text%2Dcritical+value+of+Genesis+1%3A+A+response+to+Martin+R%C3%B6sel%E2%80%99%2C+BIOSCS+32%2C+35%E2%80%9339%2E) 8. Tov, E., 1985, ‘The literary history of the Book of Jeremiah in the light of its textual history’, in J.H. Tigay (ed.), Empirical models for biblical criticism, pp. 211–237, Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tov%2C+E%2E%2C+1985%2C+%E2%80%98The+literary+history+of+the+Book+of+Jeremiah+in+the+light+of+its+textual+history%E2%80%99%2C+in+J%2EH%2E+Tigay+%28ed%2E%29%2C+Empirical+models+for+biblical+criticism%2C+pp%2E+211%E2%80%93237%2C+Pennsylvania+Press%2C+Philad) 9. Tov, E., 1986, ‘The orthography and language of the Hebrew Scrolls found at Qumran and the Origin of these Scrolls’, Textus 13, 31–49. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tov%2C+E%2E%2C+1986%2C+%E2%80%98The+orthography+and+language+of+the+Hebrew+Scrolls+found+at+Qumran+and+the+Origin+of+these+Scrolls%E2%80%99%2C+Textus+13%2C+31%E2%80%9349%2E) 10. Tov, E., 1992a, Textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible, Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tov%2C+E%2E%2C+1992a%2C+Textual+criticism+of+the+Hebrew+Bible%2C+Fortress+Press%2C+Minneapolis%2C+MN%2E) 11. Tov, E., 1992b, ‘Three fragments of Jeremiah from Qumran Cave 4’, RQ 15, 531–541. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tov%2C+E%2E%2C+1992b%2C+%E2%80%98Three+fragments+of+Jeremiah+from+Qumran+Cave+4%E2%80%99%2C+RQ+15%2C+531%E2%80%93541%2E) 12. Cook, J., 1989, ‘Orthographical peculiarities in the Dead Sea Scrolls’, RQ XIV(2), 293–305. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cook%2C+J%2E%2C+1989%2C+%E2%80%98Orthographical+peculiarities+in+the+Dead+Sea+Scrolls%E2%80%99%2C+RQ+XIV%282%29%2C+293%E2%80%93305%2E) 13. Ulrich, E. & P.W. Flint, with a contribution by Martin. G. Abegg jr, 2010, Qumran Cave 1, II. The Isaiah Scrolls Part 2: Introductions, commentary, and textual variants, Clarendon Press, Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ulrich%2C+E%2E+%26+P%2EW%2E+Flint%2C+with+a+contribution+by+Martin%2E+G%2E+Abegg+jr%2C+2010%2C+Qumran+Cave+1%2C+II%2E+The+Isaiah+Scrolls+Part+2%3A+Introductions%2C+commentary%2C+and+textual+variants%2C+Clarendon+Press%2C+Oxford%2E) 14. Cook, J., 1992, ‘The Dichotomy of 1QIsa a ’, in Z.J. Kapera (ed.), Intertestamental essays in honour of Jósef Tadeusz Milik, pp. 7–24, Enigma Press, Krakow, Poland. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cook%2C+J%2E%2C+1992%2C+%E2%80%98The+Dichotomy+of+1QIsa+a+%E2%80%99%2C+in+Z%2EJ%2E+Kapera+%28ed%2E%29%2C+Intertestamental+essays+in+honour+of+J%C3%B3sef+Tadeusz+Milik%2C+pp%2E+7%E2%80%9324%2C+Enigma+Press%2C+Krakow%2C+Poland%2E) 15. Westermann, C., 1974, Genesis I. Band genesis 1–11. BKAT, Neukirchener Verlag, Neukirchen-Vluyn. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Westermann%2C+C%2E%2C+1974%2C+Genesis+I%2E+Band+genesis+1%E2%80%9311%2E+BKAT%2C+Neukirchener+Verlag%2C+Neukirchen%2DVluyn%2E) 16. Cook, J., 1988, ‘The Qumran (Biblical Scrolls) Data Base’, JNSL 14, 27–40. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cook%2C+J%2E%2C+1988%2C+%E2%80%98The+Qumran+%28Biblical+Scrolls%29+Data+Base%E2%80%99%2C+JNSL+14%2C+27%E2%80%9340%2E)