---
title: "From Arabic Sentiment Analysis to Sarcasm — Farha 2020"
description: "Sarcasm undermines sentiment analysis because a speaker's real, usually negative, attitude is hidden behind positive-sounding wording."
authors: ["Ibrahim Abu Farha", "Walid Magdy"]
year: 2020
venue: "Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Processing Tools, with a Shared Task on Offensive Language Detection"
source: "https://aclanthology.org/2020.osact-1.5/"
licence: "CC BY-NC 4.0 (ELRA, LREC proceedings)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/farha-2020-arabic-sentiment-analysis-sarcasm-detection/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/farha-2020-arabic-sentiment-analysis-sarcasm-detection/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2020](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2020/page/3/) / From Arabic Sentiment Analysis to Sarcasm Detection: The ArSarcasm Dataset

# From Arabic Sentiment Analysis to Sarcasm Detection: The ArSarcasm Dataset

**Authors:** [Ibrahim Abu Farha](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/ibrahim-abu-farha/), [Walid Magdy](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/walid-magdy/) · **Year:** 2020 · **Venue:** Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Processing Tools, with a Shared Task on Offensive Language Detection · **Licence:** [CC BY-NC 4.0 (ELRA, LREC proceedings)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://aclanthology.org/2020.osact-1.5/) · [PDF](https://aclanthology.org/2020.osact-1.5.pdf) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W3088728183)

**Citations:** 87 citations (openalex-snapshot · 2026-10-14) · [45](#cited-by) in our library, of the 140673 papers whose bibliographies we read

## Summary
Sarcasm undermines sentiment analysis because a speaker's real, usually negative, attitude is hidden behind positive-sounding wording. Arabic had no usable public sarcasm corpus: earlier collections were never released or have largely vanished from Twitter. The authors fill this gap with ArSarcasm, built by relabelling tweets from existing Arabic sentiment datasets on the Figure-Eight crowdsourcing platform. Each tweet received three labels: sarcastic or not, a three-way sentiment label following SemEval guidelines, and a dialect tag. Comparing the new sentiment labels with the original ones shows strong annotator subjectivity, with labels shifting according to individual biases. The state-of-the-art analyser Mazajak performs clearly worse on sarcastic tweets, which suggests that such tools rely on surface polarity. A BiLSTM baseline reaches only 0.46 F1 on the sarcastic class. ArSarcasm matters as a freely downloadable Arabic sarcasm resource with dialect annotation. It also shows that detecting sarcasm requires context, world knowledge and cultural background beyond the text itself.

## Key points
- ArSarcasm has 10,547 tweets, of which 1,682 (about 16%) are sarcastic. It is released for research at github.com/iabufarha/ArSarcasm.
- The labels cover sarcasm (binary), sentiment (positive/negative/neutral) and dialect (Egyptian, Gulf, Levantine, Maghrebi, MSA).
- Mazajak scored F1 0.43/0.44 on sarcastic tweets (new/original sentiment labels). On non-sarcastic tweets it scored 0.64/0.61.
- The baseline is a BiLSTM (128 cells) with a dense layer, using Mazajak embeddings, the Adam optimiser and an 80/20 train/test split.
- Baseline results on the sarcastic class were precision 0.62, recall 0.38 and F1 0.46. The low recall shows that much sarcasm goes undetected.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

Fields: [Linguistics & languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/linguistics/)

## Cited by

Cited by

45 papers of our library cite it (of the 140673 whose bibliographies we read); 21 of them have a page here, 24 not yet.

- [ARBERT & MARBERT: Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Arabic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/abdul-2021-mageed-arbert-marbert-deep-bidirectional-transformers/)
- [SarcasmDet at SemEval-2022 Task 6: Detecting Sarcasm using Pre-trained Transformers in English and Arabic Languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/abdullah-2022-sarcasmdet-semeval-2022-task-6/)
- [Overview of the Arabic Sentiment Analysis 2021 Competition at KAUST](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alamro-2021-overview-arabic-sentiment-analysis-2021/)
- [Impact of emoji exclusion on the performance of Arabic sarcasm detection models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/aleryani-2024-impact-emoji-exclusion-performance-arabic/)
- [BARRAC: Adaptation of an English Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis Approach for Classification Tasks in Arabic Dialects](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/almutairi-2026-barrac-adaptation-english-aspect-based/)
- [Content-Localization based Neural Machine Translation for Informal Dialectal Arabic: Spanish/French to Levantine/Gulf Arabic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alzamzami-2023-content-localization-based-neural-machine/)
- [Content-Localization based System for Analyzing Sentiment and Hate Behaviors in Low-Resource Dialectal Arabic: English to Levantine and Gulf](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alzamzami-2023-content-localization-based-system-analyzing/)
- [OSN-MDAD: Machine Translation Dataset for Arabic Multi-Dialectal Conversations on Online Social Media](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alzamzami-2023-osn-mdad-machine-translation-dataset/)
- [AraCOVID19-SSD: Arabic COVID-19 Sentiment and Sarcasm Detection Dataset](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ameur-2021-aracovid19-ssd-arabic-covid-19/)
- [Whose Pragmatics? Cultural Grounding as a Bottleneck for Stereotype Detection in Egyptian Arabic Social Media](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/assem-2026-whose-pragmatics-cultural-grounding-as/)
- [SemEval-2022 Task 6: iSarcasmEval, Intended Sarcasm Detection in English and Arabic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/farha-2022-semeval-2022-task-6-isarcasmeval/)
- [Sarcasm and Sentiment Detection in Arabic language A Hybrid Approach Combining Embeddings and Rule-based Features](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/gaanoun-2021-sarcasm-sentiment-detection-arabic-language/)
- [On the importance of Data Scale in Pretraining Arabic Language Models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ghaddar-2024-importance-data-scale-pretraining-arabic/)
- [SMASH at StanceEval 2024: Prompt Engineering LLMs for Arabic Stance Detection](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hariri-2024-smash-stanceeval-2024-prompt-engineering/)
- [The IDC System for Sentiment Classification and Sarcasm Detection in Arabic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/israeli-2021-idc-system-sentiment-classification-sarcasm/)
- [Estimating the Level of Dialectness Predicts Interannotator Agreement in Multi-dialect Arabic Datasets](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/keleg-2024-estimating-level-dialectness-predicts-interannotator/)
- [Preprocessing Solutions for Detection of Sarcasm and Sentiment for Arabic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lichouri-2021-preprocessing-solutions-detection-sarcasm-sentiment/)
- [Deep Multi-Task Model for Sarcasm Detection and Sentiment Analysis in Arabic Language](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mahdaouy-2021-deep-multi-task-model-sarcasm/)
- [AraT5: Text-to-Text Transformers for Arabic Language Generation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nagoudi-2022-arat5-text-text-transformers-arabic/)
- [MarSan at SemEval-2022 Task 6: iSarcasm Detection via T5 and Sequence Learners](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/najafi-2022-marsan-semeval-2022-task-6/)
- [Automatic Prompt Optimization with “Gradient Descent” and Beam Search](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pryzant-2023-automatic-prompt-optimization-gradient-descent/)

## Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{farha2020arabic,
  title = {{From Arabic Sentiment Analysis to Sarcasm Detection: The ArSarcasm Dataset}},
  author = {Farha, Ibrahim Abu and Magdy, Walid},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Processing Tools, with a Shared Task on Offensive Language Detection},
  year = {2020},
  url = {https://aclanthology.org/2020.osact-1.5/}
}
```

- [← previous Free the Plural: Unrestricted Split-Antecedent Anaphora Resolution](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yu-2020-free-plural-unrestricted-split-antecedent/)
- [next → From Zero to Hero: On the Limitations of Zero-Shot Language Transfer with Multilingual Transformers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lauscher-2020-zero-hero-limitations-zero-shot/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2020](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2020/page/3/)

## References

45 references, 19 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Abbasi, A., Chen, H., and Salem, A. (2008). Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in web forums. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 26(3):1–34. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abbasi%2C+A%2E%2C+Chen%2C+H%2E%2C+and+Salem%2C+A%2E+%282008%29%2E+Sentiment+analysis+in+multiple+languages%3A+Feature+selection+for+opinion+classification+in+web+forums%2E+ACM+Transactions+on+Information+Systems+%28TOIS%29%2C+26%283%29%3A)
2. Abbes, I., Zaghouani, W., and El-Hardlo, O. (2020). Daict: A dialectal arabic irony corpus extracted from twitter. LREC 2020. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abbes%2C+I%2E%2C+Zaghouani%2C+W%2E%2C+and+El%2DHardlo%2C+O%2E+%282020%29%2E+Daict%3A+A+dialectal+arabic+irony+corpus+extracted+from+twitter%2E+LREC+2020%2E) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/abbes-2020-daict-dialectal-arabic-irony-corpus/)
3. Abdul-Mageed, M., Diab, M. T., and Korayem, M. (2011). Subjectivity and sentiment analysis of modern standard arabic. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Short Papers - Volume 2, HLT ’11, pages 587–591, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abdul%2DMageed%2C+M%2E%2C+Diab%2C+M%2E+T%2E%2C+and+Korayem%2C+M%2E+%282011%29%2E+Subjectivity+and+sentiment+analysis+of+modern+standard+arabic%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+49th+Annual+Meeting+of+the+Association+for+Computational+Lin)
4. Abercrombie, G. and Hovy, D. (2016). Putting sarcasm detection into context: The effects of class imbalance and manual labelling on supervised machine classification of twitter conversations. In Proceedings of the ACL 2016 Student Research Workshop, pages 107–113. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abercrombie%2C+G%2E+and+Hovy%2C+D%2E+%282016%29%2E+Putting+sarcasm+detection+into+context%3A+The+effects+of+class+imbalance+and+manual+labelling+on+supervised+machine+classification+of+twitter+conversations%2E+In+Proce) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/abercrombie-2016-putting-sarcasm-detection-into-context/)
5. Abu Farha, I. and Magdy, W. (2019). Mazajak: An online Arabic sentiment analyser. In Proceedings of the Fourth Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, pages 192–198, Florence, Italy, August. Association for Computational Linguistics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Abu+Farha%2C+I%2E+and+Magdy%2C+W%2E+%282019%29%2E+Mazajak%3A+An+online+Arabic+sentiment+analyser%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+Fourth+Arabic+Natural+Language+Processing+Workshop%2C+pages+192%E2%80%93198%2C+Florence%2C+Italy%2C+August%2E+Asso)
6. Aly, M. and Atiya, A. (2013). Labr: A large scale arabic book reviews dataset. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 494–498. [↗](https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3960.5761)
7. Amir, S., Wallace, B. C., Lyu, H., Carvalho, P., and Silva, M. J. (2016). Modelling context with user embeddings for sarcasm detection in social media. In Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 167–177, Berlin, Germany, August. Association for Computational Linguistics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Amir%2C+S%2E%2C+Wallace%2C+B%2E+C%2E%2C+Lyu%2C+H%2E%2C+Carvalho%2C+P%2E%2C+and+Silva%2C+M%2E+J%2E+%282016%29%2E+Modelling+context+with+user+embeddings+for+sarcasm+detection+in+social+media%2E+In+Proceedings+of+The+20th+SIGNLL+Conference+on+) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/amir-2016-modelling-context-user-embeddings-sarcasm/)
8. Badaro, G., Baly, R., Hajj, H., Habash, N., and El-Hajj, W. (2014). A large scale arabic sentiment lexicon for arabic opinion mining. In Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 workshop on arabic natural language processing (ANLP), pages 165–173. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Badaro%2C+G%2E%2C+Baly%2C+R%2E%2C+Hajj%2C+H%2E%2C+Habash%2C+N%2E%2C+and+El%2DHajj%2C+W%2E+%282014%29%2E+A+large+scale+arabic+sentiment+lexicon+for+arabic+opinion+mining%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+EMNLP+2014+workshop+on+arabic+natural+langua)
9. Bamman, D. and Smith, N. A. (2015). Contextualized sarcasm detection on twitter. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bamman%2C+D%2E+and+Smith%2C+N%2E+A%2E+%282015%29%2E+Contextualized+sarcasm+detection+on+twitter%2E+In+Ninth+International+AAAI+Conference+on+Web+and+Social+Media%2E)
10. Barbieri, F., Ronzano, F., and Saggion, H. (2014a). Italian irony detection in twitter: a first approach. In The First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it, page 28. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Barbieri%2C+F%2E%2C+Ronzano%2C+F%2E%2C+and+Saggion%2C+H%2E+%282014a%29%2E+Italian+irony+detection+in+twitter%3A+a+first+approach%2E+In+The+First+Italian+Conference+on+Computational+Linguistics+CLiC%2Dit%2C+page+28%2E)
11. Barbieri, F., Saggion, H., and Ronzano, F. (2014b). Modelling sarcasm in twitter, a novel approach. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis, pages 50–58. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Barbieri%2C+F%2E%2C+Saggion%2C+H%2E%2C+and+Ronzano%2C+F%2E+%282014b%29%2E+Modelling+sarcasm+in+twitter%2C+a+novel+approach%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+5th+Workshop+on+Computational+Approaches+to+Subjectivity%2C+Sentiment+and+Social) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/barbieri-2014-modelling-sarcasm-twitter-novel-approach/)
12. Bouazizi, M. and Ohtsuki, T. O. (2016). A pattern-based approach for sarcasm detection on twitter. IEEE Access, 4:5477–5488. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2594194)
13. Darwish, K., Magdy, W., et al. (2014). Arabic information retrieval. Foundations and Trends R in Information Retrieval, 7(4):239–342. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000031)
14. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., and Rappoport, A. (2010). Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in twitter and amazon. In Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on computational natural language learning, pages 107– 116. Association for Computational Linguistics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Davidov%2C+D%2E%2C+Tsur%2C+O%2E%2C+and+Rappoport%2C+A%2E+%282010%29%2E+Semi%2Dsupervised+recognition+of+sarcastic+sentences+in+twitter+and+amazon%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+fourteenth+conference+on+computational+natural+language) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/davidov-2010-semi-supervised-recognition-sarcasm-twitter/)
15. El-Beltagy, S. R. (2016). Nileulex: A phrase and word level sentiment lexicon for egyptian and modern standard arabic. In LREC. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=El%2DBeltagy%2C+S%2E+R%2E+%282016%29%2E+Nileulex%3A+A+phrase+and+word+level+sentiment+lexicon+for+egyptian+and+modern+standard+arabic%2E+In+LREC%2E)
16. Elmadany, A. A., Mubarak, H., and Magdy, W. (2018). Arsas: An arabic speech-act and sentiment corpus of tweets. In OSACT 3: The 3rd Workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Processing Tools, page 20. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Elmadany%2C+A%2E+A%2E%2C+Mubarak%2C+H%2E%2C+and+Magdy%2C+W%2E+%282018%29%2E+Arsas%3A+An+arabic+speech%2Dact+and+sentiment+corpus+of+tweets%2E+In+OSACT+3%3A+The+3rd+Workshop+on+Open%2DSource+Arabic+Corpora+and+Processing+Tools%2C+page+20)
17. Filatova, E. (2012). Irony and sarcasm: Corpus generation and analysis using crowdsourcing. In Lrec, pages 392– 398. Citeseer. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Filatova%2C+E%2E+%282012%29%2E+Irony+and+sarcasm%3A+Corpus+generation+and+analysis+using+crowdsourcing%2E+In+Lrec%2C+pages+392%E2%80%93+398%2E+Citeseer%2E) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/filatova-2012-irony-sarcasm-corpus-generation-analysis/)
18. Ghanem, B., Karoui, J., Benamara, F., Moriceau, V., and Rosso, P. (2019). Idat at fire2019: Overview of the track on irony detection in arabic tweets. In Proceedings of the 11th Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation, pages 10–13. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ghanem%2C+B%2E%2C+Karoui%2C+J%2E%2C+Benamara%2C+F%2E%2C+Moriceau%2C+V%2E%2C+and+Rosso%2C+P%2E+%282019%29%2E+Idat+at+fire2019%3A+Overview+of+the+track+on+irony+detection+in+arabic+tweets%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+11th+Forum+for+Information+)
19. Ghosh, D., Guo, W., and Muresan, S. (2015). Sarcastic or not: Word embeddings to predict the literal or sarcastic meaning of words. In proceedings of the 2015 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 1003–1012. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ghosh%2C+D%2E%2C+Guo%2C+W%2E%2C+and+Muresan%2C+S%2E+%282015%29%2E+Sarcastic+or+not%3A+Word+embeddings+to+predict+the+literal+or+sarcastic+meaning+of+words%2E+In+proceedings+of+the+2015+conference+on+empirical+methods+in+natura) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ghosh-2015-sarcastic-or-not-word-embeddings/)
20. Gibbs Jr, R. W., Gibbs, R. W., and Gibbs, J. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gibbs+Jr%2C+R%2E+W%2E%2C+Gibbs%2C+R%2E+W%2E%2C+and+Gibbs%2C+J%2E+%281994%29%2E+The+poetics+of+mind%3A+Figurative+thought%2C+language%2C+and+understanding%2E+Cambridge+University+Press%2E)
21. Grice, H. P., Cole, P., and Morgan, J. L. (1975). Syntax and semantics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Grice%2C+H%2E+P%2E%2C+Cole%2C+P%2E%2C+and+Morgan%2C+J%2E+L%2E+%281975%29%2E+Syntax+and+semantics%2E)
22. Habash, N. Y. (2010). Introduction to arabic natural language processing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 3(1):1–187. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02139-8)
23. Hussein, D. M. E.-D. M. (2018). A survey on sentiment analysis challenges. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 30(4):330 – 338. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hussein%2C+D%2E+M%2E+E%2E%2DD%2E+M%2E+%282018%29%2E+A+survey+on+sentiment+analysis+challenges%2E+Journal+of+King+Saud+University+%2D+Engineering+Sciences%2C+30%284%29%3A330+%E2%80%93+338%2E)
24. Ibrahim, H. S., Abdou, S. M., and Gheith, M. (2015). Mika: A tagged corpus for modern standard arabic and colloquial sentiment analysis. In 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Systems (ReTIS), pages 353–358. IEEE. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ibrahim%2C+H%2E+S%2E%2C+Abdou%2C+S%2E+M%2E%2C+and+Gheith%2C+M%2E+%282015%29%2E+Mika%3A+A+tagged+corpus+for+modern+standard+arabic+and+colloquial+sentiment+analysis%2E+In+2015+IEEE+2nd+International+Conference+on+Recent+Trends+in+I)
25. Joshi, A., Sharma, V., and Bhattacharyya, P. (2015). Harnessing context incongruity for sarcasm detection. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 757–762. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Joshi%2C+A%2E%2C+Sharma%2C+V%2E%2C+and+Bhattacharyya%2C+P%2E+%282015%29%2E+Harnessing+context+incongruity+for+sarcasm+detection%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+53rd+Annual+Meeting+of+the+Association+for+Computational+Linguistics+an) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/joshi-2015-harnessing-context-incongruity-sarcasm-detection/)
26. Joshi, A., Tripathi, V., Bhattacharyya, P., and Carman, M. (2016). Harnessing sequence labeling for sarcasm detection in dialogue from tv series ‘friends’. In Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 146–155. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Joshi%2C+A%2E%2C+Tripathi%2C+V%2E%2C+Bhattacharyya%2C+P%2E%2C+and+Carman%2C+M%2E+%282016%29%2E+Harnessing+sequence+labeling+for+sarcasm+detection+in+dialogue+from+tv+series+%E2%80%98friends%E2%80%99%2E+In+Proceedings+of+The+20th+SIGNLL+Conference) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/joshi-2016-harnessing-sequence-labeling-sarcasm-detection/)
27. Joshi, A., Bhattacharyya, P., and Carman, M. J. (2017). Automatic sarcasm detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(5):73. [↗](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.03426) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/joshi-2016-automatic-sarcasm-detection-survey/)
28. Justo, R., Corcoran, T., Lukin, S. M., Walker, M., and Torres, M. I. (2014). Extracting relevant knowledge for the detection of sarcasm and nastiness in the social web. Knowledge-Based Systems, 69:124–133. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.021)
29. Karoui, J., Zitoune, F. B., and Moriceau, V. (2017). Soukhria: Towards an irony detection system for arabic in social media. Procedia Computer Science, 117:161– 168. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Karoui%2C+J%2E%2C+Zitoune%2C+F%2E+B%2E%2C+and+Moriceau%2C+V%2E+%282017%29%2E+Soukhria%3A+Towards+an+irony+detection+system+for+arabic+in+social+media%2E+Procedia+Computer+Science%2C+117%3A161%E2%80%93+168%2E)
30. Khodak, M., Saunshi, N., and Vodrahalli, K. (2018). A large self-annotated corpus for sarcasm. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan, May. European Language Resources Association (ELRA). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Khodak%2C+M%2E%2C+Saunshi%2C+N%2E%2C+and+Vodrahalli%2C+K%2E+%282018%29%2E+A+large+self%2Dannotated+corpus+for+sarcasm%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+Eleventh+International+Conference+on+Language+Resources+and+Evaluation+%28LREC+2018%29%2C) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/khodak-2018-large-self-annotated-corpus-sarcasm/)
31. Kiritchenko, S., Mohammad, S., and Salameh, M. (2016). Semeval-2016 task 7: Determining sentiment intensity of english and arabic phrases. In Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SEMEVAL-2016), pages 42–51. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Kiritchenko%2C+S%2E%2C+Mohammad%2C+S%2E%2C+and+Salameh%2C+M%2E+%282016%29%2E+Semeval%2D2016+task+7%3A+Determining+sentiment+intensity+of+english+and+arabic+phrases%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+10th+international+workshop+on+semantic)
32. Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 5(1):1–167. [↗](https://doi.org/10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016)
33. Mahyoub, F. H., Siddiqui, M. A., and Dahab, M. Y. (2014). Building an arabic sentiment lexicon using semi-supervised learning. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(4):417 – 424. Special Issue on Arabic NLP. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.06.003)
34. Mourad, A. and Darwish, K. (2013). Subjectivity and sentiment analysis of modern standard arabic and arabic microblogs. In Proceedings of the 4th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, pages 55–64. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Mourad%2C+A%2E+and+Darwish%2C+K%2E+%282013%29%2E+Subjectivity+and+sentiment+analysis+of+modern+standard+arabic+and+arabic+microblogs%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+4th+workshop+on+computational+approaches+to+subjectivity%2C+)
35. Nabil, M., Aly, M., and Atiya, A. (2015). Astd: Arabic sentiment tweets dataset. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2515–2519. [↗](https://doi.org/10.60692/3ee2g-zjt73) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nabil-2015-astd-arabic-sentiment-tweets-dataset/)
36. Oprea, S. and Magdy, W. (2019a). Exploring author context for detecting intended vs perceived sarcasm. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2854–2859, Florence, Italy, July. Association for Computational Linguistics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Oprea%2C+S%2E+and+Magdy%2C+W%2E+%282019a%29%2E+Exploring+author+context+for+detecting+intended+vs+perceived+sarcasm%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+57th+Annual+Meeting+of+the+Association+for+Computational+Linguistics%2C+pages) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/oprea-2019-exploring-author-context-detecting-intended/)
37. Oprea, S. and Magdy, W. (2019b). isarcasm: A dataset of intended sarcasm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03123. [↗](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03123) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/oprea-2020-isarcasm-dataset-intended-sarcasm/)
38. Pang, B., Lee, L., and Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10, pages 79–86. Association for Computational Linguistics. [↗](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.cs/0205070) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pang-2002-thumbs-up-sentiment-classification-machine/)
39. Ptáček, T., Habernal, I., and Hong, J. (2014). Sarcasm detection on czech and english twitter. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pages 213–223. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Pta%CC%81c%CC%8Cek%2C+T%2E%2C+Habernal%2C+I%2E%2C+and+Hong%2C+J%2E+%282014%29%2E+Sarcasm+detection+on+czech+and+english+twitter%2E+In+Proceedings+of+COLING+2014%2C+the+25th+International+Conference+on+Computational+Linguistics%3A+Technica) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ptacek-2014-sarcasm-detection-czech-english-twitter/)
40. Rajadesingan, A., Zafarani, R., and Liu, H. (2015). Sarcasm detection on twitter: A behavioral modeling approach. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 97– 106. ACM. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rajadesingan%2C+A%2E%2C+Zafarani%2C+R%2E%2C+and+Liu%2C+H%2E+%282015%29%2E+Sarcasm+detection+on+twitter%3A+A+behavioral+modeling+approach%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+Eighth+ACM+International+Conference+on+Web+Search+and+Data+Minin)
41. Refaee, E. and Rieser, V. (2014). An arabic twitter corpus for subjectivity and sentiment analysis. In LREC, pages 2268–2273. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Refaee%2C+E%2E+and+Rieser%2C+V%2E+%282014%29%2E+An+arabic+twitter+corpus+for+subjectivity+and+sentiment+analysis%2E+In+LREC%2C+pages+2268%E2%80%932273%2E)
42. Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., De Silva, L., Gilbert, N., and Huang, R. (2013). Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 704–714. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Riloff%2C+E%2E%2C+Qadir%2C+A%2E%2C+Surve%2C+P%2E%2C+De+Silva%2C+L%2E%2C+Gilbert%2C+N%2E%2C+and+Huang%2C+R%2E+%282013%29%2E+Sarcasm+as+contrast+between+a+positive+sentiment+and+negative+situation%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+2013+Conference+on+Emp) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/prag-2013-riloff-sarcasm-as-contrast-between-positive/)
43. Rosenthal, S., Farra, N., and Nakov, P. (2017). SemEval-2017 task 4: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval ’17, Vancouver, Canada, August. Association for Computational Linguistics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rosenthal%2C+S%2E%2C+Farra%2C+N%2E%2C+and+Nakov%2C+P%2E+%282017%29%2E+SemEval%2D2017+task+4%3A+Sentiment+analysis+in+Twitter%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+11th+International+Workshop+on+Semantic+Evaluation%2C+SemEval+%E2%80%9917%2C+Vancouver%2C+Ca) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/rosenthal-2017-semeval-2017-task-4-sentiment/)
44. Van Hee, C., Lefever, E., and Hoste, V. (2018). Semeval-2018 task 3: Irony detection in english tweets. In Proceedings of The 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 39–50. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Van+Hee%2C+C%2E%2C+Lefever%2C+E%2E%2C+and+Hoste%2C+V%2E+%282018%29%2E+Semeval%2D2018+task+3%3A+Irony+detection+in+english+tweets%2E+In+Proceedings+of+The+12th+International+Workshop+on+Semantic+Evaluation%2C+pages+39%E2%80%9350%2E) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hee-2018-semeval-2018-task-3-irony/)
45. Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua, 116(10):1722. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001)
