---
title: "GraphEval — paper by Feng et al. (2025) — summary and ideas"
description: "The authors propose GraphEval, a lightweight framework that restructures this task. 85.00% accuracy. 78 references, cited by 10 papers here."
authors: ["Tao Feng", "Yihang Sun", "Jiaxuan You"]
year: 2025
venue: "arXiv:2503.12600"
source: "https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12600"
doi: "10.48550/arxiv.2503.12600"
arxiv: "2503.12600"
licence: "CC BY 4.0 (arXiv)"
licence_url: "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/feng-2025-grapheval-lightweight-graph-based-llm/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/feng-2025-grapheval-lightweight-graph-based-llm/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2025](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2025/page/10/) / GraphEval: A Lightweight Graph-Based LLM Framework for Idea Evaluation

# GraphEval: A Lightweight Graph-Based LLM Framework for Idea Evaluation

**Authors:** [Tao Feng](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/tao-feng/), Yihang Sun and [Jiaxuan You](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/jiaxuan-you/) · **Year:** 2025 · **Venue:** arXiv:2503.12600 · **Licence:** [CC BY 4.0 (arXiv)](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12600) · [PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.12600) · [DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2503.12600](https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.12600) · [arXiv 2503.12600](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12600) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W6929273470)

**Citations:** 0 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) · [10](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/feng-2025-grapheval-lightweight-graph-based-llm/cited-by/) in our library, of the 149,439 papers whose bibliographies we read

## Summary
Using LLMs to judge research ideas is fragile. Their scores shift noticeably when the prompt is slightly reworded, they lean toward favourable verdicts, and they often miss factual errors buried inside an otherwise plausible idea.

The authors propose GraphEval, a lightweight framework that restructures this task. A small prompted LLM first splits each idea into short, self-contained viewpoints. These become nodes in a shared viewpoint-graph, with edges derived from LLM relation extraction and/or BERT similarity. Two predictors run on this graph:
- **GraphEval-LP** needs no training. It spreads known quality labels to unlabelled nodes along weighted edges.
- **GraphEval-GNN** is a compact graph neural network trained to predict labels. It also uses temporal node features and is trained on deliberately constructed plagiarised ideas labelled as weak, so it learns to penalise unoriginal work.

Across two datasets, GraphEval improves F1 by at least 14% over prompting and fine-tuning baselines, while keeping compute and API costs low. It can also detect plagiarised ideas. The work shows that breaking ideas into connected viewpoints makes automated review cheaper and more robust.

## Key points
- Baselines include prompted LLMs (7B and 72B), Finetuned-Bert, and prompt pipelines from Research Agent and AI Scientist. The code is available at github.com/ulab-uiuc/GraphEval.
- On the Fact Verification dataset, GraphEval-GNN reaches 85.00% accuracy and 84.00% macro F1. GraphEval-LP scores 82.40% F1, Finetuned-Bert 68.64%, and the 72B prompted LLM 56.33%.
- When ideas are evaluated across different years, GraphEval-GNN achieves 51.32% macro F1, compared with 31.57% for Finetuned-Bert and 11.76% for the 72B LLM. On ASAP-Review, the margin is smaller: 32.20% versus 29.86% for Finetuned-Bert.
- In a comparison of lightweight graph models, the GNN variant (44.80% F1) clearly beats GraphEval-SGC (27.3%) and GraphEval-LightGCN (26.70%). It also outperforms a "Hybrid" relation-extraction alternative (25.46%).
- Extracted viewpoints stay faithful to their source ideas. Entity-level factual consistency F1 is 0.9314 on ICLR Papers and 0.9232 on AI Researcher.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

📚 Shelves (5): [🖥️ Computer Science](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/) · 19,503 works · [🤖 Artificial Intelligence](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/) · 18,805 works · [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 17,959 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 17,789 works · [🗄️ Information Systems](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/information-systems/) · 1,888 works

🧭 Topics (1): [🧠 Language models & pretraining](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/language-models/) · 4,145 works

## Cite

Cite as: Tao Feng, Yihang Sun and Jiaxuan You. 2025. GraphEval: A Lightweight Graph-Based LLM Framework for Idea Evaluation. arXiv:2503.12600.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@misc{feng2025grapheval,
  title = {{GraphEval: A Lightweight Graph-Based LLM Framework for Idea Evaluation}},
  author = {Tao Feng, Yihang Sun and Jiaxuan You},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2503.12600},
  eprint = {2503.12600},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.12600}
}
```

- [← previous Findings of the Fourth Shared Task on Multilingual Coreference Resolution: Can LLMs Dethrone Traditional Approaches?](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/novak-2025-findings-fourth-shared-task-multilingual/)
- [next → Hunyuan-TurboS: Advancing Large Language Models through Mamba-Transformer Synergy and Adaptive Chain-of-Thought](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/team-2025-hunyuan-hunyuan-turbos-advancing-large/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2025](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2025/page/10/)

## References

78 references, 24 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Qwen2 technical report. 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Qwen2+technical+report%2E+2024%2E)
2. Jinheon Baek, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Silviu Cucerzan, and Sung Ju Hwang. [Researchagent: Iterative research idea generation over scientific literature with large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/baek-2024-researchagent-iterative-research-idea/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07738, 2024.
3. J Jason Bell, Christian Pescher, Gerard J Tellis, and Johann Füller. Can ai help in ideation? a theory-based model for idea screening in crowdsourcing contests. Marketing Science, 43(1):54–72, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=J+Jason+Bell%2C+Christian+Pescher%2C+Gerard+J+Tellis%2C+and+Johann+Fu%CC%88ller%2E+Can+ai+help+in+ideation%3F+a+theory%2Dbased+model+for+idea+screening+in+crowdsourcing+contests%2E+Marketing+Science%2C+43%281%29%3A54%E2%80%9372%2C+2024%2E)
4. Tom B Brown. [Language models are few-shot learners](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/brown-2020-language-models-few-shot-learners/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165, 2020.
5. Salvatore Carta, Alessandro Giuliani, Leonardo Piano, Alessandro Sebastian Podda, Livio Pompianu, and Sandro Gabriele Tiddia. Iterative zero-shot llm prompting for knowledge graph construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01128, 2023. — [arXiv:2307.01128](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01128) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Salvatore+Carta%2C+Alessandro+Giuliani%2C+Leonardo+Piano%2C+Alessandro+Sebastian+Podda%2C+Livio+Pompianu%2C+and+Sandro+Gabriele+Tiddia%2E+Iterative+zero%2Dshot+llm+prompting+for+knowledge+graph+construction%2E+arXiv+)
6. Rosemary A Cowell, Morgan D Barense, and Patrick S Sadil. A roadmap for understanding memory: Decomposing cognitive processes into operations and representations. Eneuro, 6(4), 2019. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rosemary+A+Cowell%2C+Morgan+D+Barense%2C+and+Patrick+S+Sadil%2E+A+roadmap+for+understanding+memory%3A+Decomposing+cognitive+processes+into+operations+and+representations%2E+Eneuro%2C+6%284%29%2C+2019%2E)
7. Jacob Devlin. [Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/devlin-2019-bert-pre-training-deep-bidirectional/). arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
8. P Kingma Diederik. [Adam: A method for stochastic optimization](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kingma-2014-adam-method-stochastic-optimization/). (No Title), 2014.
9. Katinka Dijkstra, Anita Eerland, Josjan Zijlmans, and Lysanne S Post. Embodied cognition, abstract concepts, and the benefits of new technology for implicit body manipulation. Frontiers in psychology, 5:757, 2014. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Katinka+Dijkstra%2C+Anita+Eerland%2C+Josjan+Zijlmans%2C+and+Lysanne+S+Post%2E+Embodied+cognition%2C+abstract+concepts%2C+and+the+benefits+of+new+technology+for+implicit+body+manipulation%2E+Frontiers+in+psychology%2C)
10. Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, Zhongfen Deng, Shuaiqi Liu, Renze Lou, Henry Peng Zou, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Nan Zhang, Mukund Srinath, et al. Llms assist nlp researchers: Critique paper (meta-) reviewing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.[16253, 2024](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/du-2024-llms-assist-nlp-researchers-critique/).
11. Darren Edge, Ha Trinh, Newman Cheng, Joshua Bradley, Alex Chao, Apurva Mody, Steven Truitt, and Jonathan Larson. From local to global: A graph rag approach to query-focused summarization, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16130. [↗](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16130)
12. Federico Errica, Giuseppe Siracusano, Davide Sanvito, and Roberto Bifulco. What did i do wrong? quantifying llms’ sensitivity and consistency to prompt engineering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.[12334, 2024](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/errica-2025-what-did-i-do-wrong/).
13. Mingqi Gao, Jie Ruan, Renliang Sun, Xunjian Yin, Shiping Yang, and Xiaojun Wan. [Human-like summarization evaluation with chatgpt](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/gao-2023-human-like-summarization-evaluation-chatgpt/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02554, 2023.
14. Akash Ghosh, Arkadeep Acharya, Raghav Jain, Sriparna Saha, Aman Chadha, and Setu Sinha. Clipsyntel: clip and llm synergy for multimodal question summarization in healthcare. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pp. 22031–22039, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Akash+Ghosh%2C+Arkadeep+Acharya%2C+Raghav+Jain%2C+Sriparna+Saha%2C+Aman+Chadha%2C+and+Setu+Sinha%2E+Clipsyntel%3A+clip+and+llm+synergy+for+multimodal+question+summarization+in+healthcare%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+AAAI)
15. Akshay Goel, Almog Gueta, Omry Gilon, Chang Liu, Sofia Erell, Lan Huong Nguyen, Xiaohong Hao, Bolous Jaber, Shashir Reddy, Rupesh Kartha, et al. Llms accelerate annotation for medical information extraction. In Machine Learning for Health (ML4H), pp. 82–100. PMLR, 2023. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Akshay+Goel%2C+Almog+Gueta%2C+Omry+Gilon%2C+Chang+Liu%2C+Sofia+Erell%2C+Lan+Huong+Nguyen%2C+Xiaohong+Hao%2C+Bolous+Jaber%2C+Shashir+Reddy%2C+Rupesh+Kartha%2C+et+al%2E+Llms+accelerate+annotation+for+medical+information+extr)
16. Ayoub Harnoune, Maryem Rhanoui, Mounia Mikram, Siham Yousfi, Zineb Elkaimbillah, and Bouchra El Asri. Bert based clinical knowledge extraction for biomedical knowledge graph construction and analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 1:100042, 2021. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ayoub+Harnoune%2C+Maryem+Rhanoui%2C+Mounia+Mikram%2C+Siham+Yousfi%2C+Zineb+Elkaimbillah%2C+and+Bouchra+El+Asri%2E+Bert+based+clinical+knowledge+extraction+for+biomedical+knowledge+graph+construction+and+analysis%2E)
17. Justin C Hayes and David JM Kraemer. Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of stem learning. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2:1–15, 2017. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Justin+C+Hayes+and+David+JM+Kraemer%2E+Grounded+understanding+of+abstract+concepts%3A+The+case+of+stem+learning%2E+Cognitive+research%3A+principles+and+implications%2C+2%3A1%E2%80%9315%2C+2017%2E)
18. Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval, pp. 639–648, 2020. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Xiangnan+He%2C+Kuan+Deng%2C+Xiang+Wang%2C+Yan+Li%2C+Yongdong+Zhang%2C+and+Meng+Wang%2E+Lightgcn%3A+Simplifying+and+powering+graph+convolution+network+for+recommendation%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+43rd+International+ACM)
19. Yanli Huang. How to represent abstract concepts? from the perspective of conceptual metaphor theory. J Hum Psychol, 1(2):27–37, 2020. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Yanli+Huang%2E+How+to+represent+abstract+concepts%3F+from+the+perspective+of+conceptual+metaphor+theory%2E+J+Hum+Psychol%2C+1%282%29%3A27%E2%80%9337%2C+2020%2E)
20. Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebastian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. [Unsupervised dense information retrieval with contrastive learning](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/izacard-2021-unsupervised-dense-information-retrieval-contrastive/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09118, 2021.
21. Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroi… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Albert+Q%2E+Jiang%2C+Alexandre+Sablayrolles%2C+Arthur+Mensch%2C+Chris+Bamford%2C+Devendra+Singh+Chaplot%2C+Diego+de+las+Casas%2C+Florian+Bressand%2C+Gianna+Lengyel%2C+Guillaume+Lample%2C+Lucile+Saulnier%2C+Le%CC%81lio+Renard+La)
22. Hanlei Jin, Yang Zhang, Dan Meng, Jun Wang, and Jinghua Tan. A comprehensive survey on process-oriented automatic text summarization with exploration of llm-based methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02901, 2024. — [arXiv:2403.02901](https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02901) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hanlei+Jin%2C+Yang+Zhang%2C+Dan+Meng%2C+Jun+Wang%2C+and+Jinghua+Tan%2E+A+comprehensive+survey+on+process%2Doriented+automatic+text+summarization+with+exploration+of+llm%2Dbased+methods%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2403%2E02)
23. Dawulie Jinensibieke, Mieradilijiang Maimaiti, Wentao Xiao, Yuanhang Zheng, and Xiangbo Wang. How good are llms at relation extraction under low-resource scenario? comprehensive evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11162, 2024. — [arXiv:2406.11162](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11162) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dawulie+Jinensibieke%2C+Mieradilijiang+Maimaiti%2C+Wentao+Xiao%2C+Yuanhang+Zheng%2C+and+Xiangbo+Wang%2E+How+good+are+llms+at+relation+extraction+under+low%2Dresource+scenario%3F+comprehensive+evaluation%2E+arXiv+prep)
24. Julian Just, Thomas Ströhle, Johann Füller, and Katja Hutter. Ai-based novelty detection in crowdsourced idea spaces. Innovation, 26(3):359–386, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Julian+Just%2C+Thomas+Stro%CC%88hle%2C+Johann+Fu%CC%88ller%2C+and+Katja+Hutter%2E+Ai%2Dbased+novelty+detection+in+crowdsourced+idea+spaces%2E+Innovation%2C+26%283%29%3A359%E2%80%93386%2C+2024%2E)
25. Omid Khatin-Zadeh and Danyal Farsani. The understanding of abstract concepts: a perspective from distributed models of conceptual representation. Discover Psychology, 2(1):34, 2022. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Omid+Khatin%2DZadeh+and+Danyal+Farsani%2E+The+understanding+of+abstract+concepts%3A+a+perspective+from+distributed+models+of+conceptual+representation%2E+Discover+Psychology%2C+2%281%29%3A34%2C+2022%2E)
26. Markus Knauff and Ann G Wolf. Complex cognition: the science of human reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making, 2010. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Markus+Knauff+and+Ann+G+Wolf%2E+Complex+cognition%3A+the+science+of+human+reasoning%2C+problem%2Dsolving%2C+and+decision%2Dmaking%2C+2010%2E)
27. Litton J Kurisinkel and Nancy F Chen. Llm based multi-document summarization exploiting main-event biased monotone submodular content extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03414, 2023. — [arXiv:2310.03414](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03414) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Litton+J+Kurisinkel+and+Nancy+F+Chen%2E+Llm+based+multi%2Ddocument+summarization+exploiting+main%2Devent+biased+monotone+submodular+content+extraction%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2310%2E03414%2C+2023%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2310%2E0)
28. LangChain. Langchain graphs. [https://python.langchain.com/docs/use_cases/](https://python.langchain.com/docs/use_cases/) graph/, 2024. [↗](https://python.langchain.com/docs/use_cases/)
29. Baorui Li, Yi Wang, Kesheng Wang, and Jinghui Yang. Application of cnn deep learning in product design evaluation. In Advanced Manufacturing and Automation VIII 8, pp. 517–526. Springer, 2019. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Baorui+Li%2C+Yi+Wang%2C+Kesheng+Wang%2C+and+Jinghui+Yang%2E+Application+of+cnn+deep+learning+in+product+design+evaluation%2E+In+Advanced+Manufacturing+and+Automation+VIII+8%2C+pp%2E+517%E2%80%93526%2E+Springer%2C+2019%2E)
30. Xiaonan Li, Kai Lv, Hang Yan, Tianyang Lin, Wei Zhu, Yuan Ni, Guotong Xie, Xiaoling Wang, and Xipeng Qiu. [Unified demonstration retriever for in-context learning](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/li-2023-unified-demonstration-retriever-context-learning/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04320, 2023.
31. Weixin Liang, Yuhui Zhang, Hancheng Cao, Binglu Wang, Daisy Yi Ding, Xinyu Yang, Kailas Vodrahalli, Siyu He, Daniel Scott Smith, Yian Yin, et al. [Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? a large-scale empirical analysis](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/liang-2023-large-language-models-provide/). NEJM AI, 1(8):AIoa2400196, 2024.
32. Hunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yura Burda, Harri Edwards, Bowen Baker, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Karl Cobbe. Let’s verify step by step. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.[20050, 2023](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lightman-2023-let-s-verify-step-step/).
33. Jialiang Lin, Jiaxin Song, Zhangping Zhou, Yidong Chen, and Xiaodong Shi. Automated scholarly paper review: concepts, technologies, and challenges. Information fusion, 98:101830, 2023a. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jialiang+Lin%2C+Jiaxin+Song%2C+Zhangping+Zhou%2C+Yidong+Chen%2C+and+Xiaodong+Shi%2E+Automated+scholarly+paper+review%3A+concepts%2C+technologies%2C+and+challenges%2E+Information+fusion%2C+98%3A101830%2C+2023a%2E)
34. Sheng-Chieh Lin, Akari Asai, Minghan Li, Barlas Oguz, Jimmy Lin, Yashar Mehdad, Wen-tau Yih, and Xilun Chen. [How to train your dragon: Diverse augmentation towards generalizable dense retrieval](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lin-2023-how-train-your-dragon-diverse/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07452, 2023b.
35. LlamaIndex. Llamaindex knowledge graph index. [https://docs.llamaindex.ai/en/](https://docs.llamaindex.ai/en/) stable/examples/index_structs/knowledge_graph/KnowledgeGraphDemo. html, 2024. [↗](https://docs.llamaindex.ai/en/)
36. Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, and David Ha. [The ai scientist: Towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lu-2024-ai-scientist-fully-automated/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292, 2024.
37. Zheheng Luo, Qianqian Xie, and Sophia Ananiadou. [Chatgpt as a factual inconsistency evaluator for text summarization](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/luo-2023-chatgpt-factual-inconsistency-evaluator-text/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15621, 2023.
38. Jinjie Mai, Jun Chen, Guocheng Qian, Mohamed Elhoseiny, Bernard Ghanem, et al. Llm as a robotic brain: Unifying egocentric memory and control. 2023. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jinjie+Mai%2C+Jun+Chen%2C+Guocheng+Qian%2C+Mohamed+Elhoseiny%2C+Bernard+Ghanem%2C+et+al%2E+Llm+as+a+robotic+brain%3A+Unifying+egocentric+memory+and+control%2E+2023%2E)
39. Christopher D Manning. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. The MIT Press, 1999. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Christopher+D+Manning%2E+Foundations+of+statistical+natural+language+processing%2E+The+MIT+Press%2C+1999%2E)
40. Sewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Pang Wei Koh, Mohit Iyyer, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. [Factscore: Fine-grained atomic evaluation of factual precision in long form text generation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/min-2023-factscore-fine-grained-atomic-evaluation/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14251, 2023.
41. Feng Nan, Ramesh Nallapati, Zhiguo Wang, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Henghui Zhu, Dejiao Zhang, Kathleen McKeown, and Bing Xiang. [Entity-level factual consistency of abstractive text summarization](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nan-2021-entity-level-factual-consistency-abstractive/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.09130, 2021.
42. Bryan Perozzi, Bahare Fatemi, Dustin Zelle, Anton Tsitsulin, Mehran Kazemi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Jonathan Halcrow. Let your graph do the talking: Encoding structured data for llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05862, 2024. — [arXiv:2402.05862](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05862) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bryan+Perozzi%2C+Bahare+Fatemi%2C+Dustin+Zelle%2C+Anton+Tsitsulin%2C+Mehran+Kazemi%2C+Rami+Al%2DRfou%2C+and+Jonathan+Halcrow%2E+Let+your+graph+do+the+talking%3A+Encoding+structured+data+for+llms%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2)
43. Marco Pota, Mirko Ventura, Hamido Fujita, and Massimo Esposito. Multilingual evaluation of pre-processing for bert-based sentiment analysis of tweets. Expert Systems with Applications, 181: 115119, 2021. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Marco+Pota%2C+Mirko+Ventura%2C+Hamido+Fujita%2C+and+Massimo+Esposito%2E+Multilingual+evaluation+of+pre%2Dprocessing+for+bert%2Dbased+sentiment+analysis+of+tweets%2E+Expert+Systems+with+Applications%2C+181%3A+115119%2C+20)
44. Rukhma Qasim, Waqas Haider Bangyal, Mohammed A Alqarni, and Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi. A fine-tuned bert-based transfer learning approach for text classification. Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022(1):3498123, 2022. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rukhma+Qasim%2C+Waqas+Haider+Bangyal%2C+Mohammed+A+Alqarni%2C+and+Abdulwahab+Ali+Almazroi%2E+A+fine%2Dtuned+bert%2Dbased+transfer+learning+approach+for+text+classification%2E+Journal+of+healthcare+engineering%2C+2022)
45. Usha Nandini Raghavan, Réka Albert, and Soundar Kumara. Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 76(3):036106, 2007. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Usha+Nandini+Raghavan%2C+Re%CC%81ka+Albert%2C+and+Soundar+Kumara%2E+Near+linear+time+algorithm+to+detect+community+structures+in+large%2Dscale+networks%2E+Physical+Review+E%E2%80%94Statistical%2C+Nonlinear%2C+and+Soft+Matter+Ph)
46. Lance J Rips, Edward E Smith, and Douglas L Medin. Concepts and categories: Memory, meaning, and metaphysics. The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning, 1:177–209, 2012. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lance+J+Rips%2C+Edward+E+Smith%2C+and+Douglas+L+Medin%2E+Concepts+and+categories%3A+Memory%2C+meaning%2C+and+metaphysics%2E+The+Oxford+handbook+of+thinking+and+reasoning%2C+1%3A177%E2%80%93209%2C+2012%2E)
47. A Rush. [A neural attention model for abstractive sentence summarization](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/rush-2015-neural-attention-model-abstractive-sentence/). arXiv Preprint, CoRR, abs/1509.00685, 2015.
48. Victor Sanh, Lysandre Debut, Julien Chaumond, and Thomas Wolf. [Distilbert, a distilled version of bert: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/sanh-2019-distilbert-distilled-version-bert-smaller/). ArXiv, abs/1910.01108, 2019.
49. Hannah Sansford, Nicholas Richardson, Hermina Petric Maretic, and Juba Nait Saada. Grapheval: A knowledge-graph based llm hallucination evaluation framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10793, 2024. — [arXiv:2407.10793](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10793) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hannah+Sansford%2C+Nicholas+Richardson%2C+Hermina+Petric+Maretic%2C+and+Juba+Nait+Saada%2E+Grapheval%3A+A+knowledge%2Dgraph+based+llm+hallucination+evaluation+framework%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2407%2E10793%2C+2024%2E+%E2%80%94+%5B)
50. Shubhra Kanti Karmaker Santu, Sanjeev Kumar Sinha, Naman Bansal, Alex Knipper, Souvika Sarkar, John Salvador, Yash Mahajan, Sri Guttikonda, Mousumi Akter, Matthew Freestone, et al. Prompting llms to compose meta-review drafts from peer-review narratives of scholarly manuscripts. arXiv preprint arXiv… — [arXiv:2402.15589](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15589) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shubhra+Kanti+Karmaker+Santu%2C+Sanjeev+Kumar+Sinha%2C+Naman+Bansal%2C+Alex+Knipper%2C+Souvika+Sarkar%2C+John+Salvador%2C+Yash+Mahajan%2C+Sri+Guttikonda%2C+Mousumi+Akter%2C+Matthew+Freestone%2C+et+al%2E+Prompting+llms+to+c)
51. Wenbo Shang, Xuliang Zhu, and Xin Huang. Path-llm: A shortest-path-based llm learning for unified graph representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05456, 2024. — [arXiv:2408.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05456) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wenbo+Shang%2C+Xuliang+Zhu%2C+and+Xin+Huang%2E+Path%2Dllm%3A+A+shortest%2Dpath%2Dbased+llm+learning+for+unified+graph+representation%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2408%2E05456%2C+2024%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2408%2E05456%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fab)
52. Shreya Shankar, JD Zamfirescu-Pereira, Björn Hartmann, Aditya G Parameswaran, and Ian Arawjo. Who validates the validators? aligning llm-assisted evaluation of llm outputs with human preferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12272, 2024. — [arXiv:2404.12272](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12272) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shreya+Shankar%2C+JD+Zamfirescu%2DPereira%2C+Bjo%CC%88rn+Hartmann%2C+Aditya+G+Parameswaran%2C+and+Ian+Arawjo%2E+Who+validates+the+validators%3F+aligning+llm%2Dassisted+evaluation+of+llm+outputs+with+human+preferences%2E+arX)
53. Guangsi Shi, Xiaofeng Deng, Linhao Luo, Lijuan Xia, Lei Bao, Bei Ye, Fei Du, Shirui Pan, and Yuxiao Li. Llm-powered explanations: Unraveling recommendations through subgraph reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15859, 2024. — [arXiv:2406.15859](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15859) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Guangsi+Shi%2C+Xiaofeng+Deng%2C+Linhao+Luo%2C+Lijuan+Xia%2C+Lei+Bao%2C+Bei+Ye%2C+Fei+Du%2C+Shirui+Pan%2C+and+Yuxiao+Li%2E+Llm%2Dpowered+explanations%3A+Unraveling+recommendations+through+subgraph+reasoning%2E+arXiv+preprint+)
54. Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. [Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shinn-2023-reflexion-language-agents-verbal-reinforcement/). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
55. Chenglei Si, Diyi Yang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. [Can llms generate novel research ideas? a large-scale human study with 100+ nlp researchers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/si-2024-llms-generate-novel-research/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04109, 2024.
56. Dominik Siemon. Let the computer evaluate your idea: evaluation apprehension in human-computer collaboration. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(5):459–477, 2023. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dominik+Siemon%2E+Let+the+computer+evaluate+your+idea%3A+evaluation+apprehension+in+human%2Dcomputer+collaboration%2E+Behaviour+%26+Information+Technology%2C+42%285%29%3A459%E2%80%93477%2C+2023%2E)
57. John Stamper, Ruiwei Xiao, and Xinying Hou. Enhancing llm-based feedback: Insights from intelligent tutoring systems and the learning sciences. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 32–43. Springer, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=John+Stamper%2C+Ruiwei+Xiao%2C+and+Xinying+Hou%2E+Enhancing+llm%2Dbased+feedback%3A+Insights+from+intelligent+tutoring+systems+and+the+learning+sciences%2E+In+International+Conference+on+Artificial+Intelligence+i)
58. Lina Sun and Sitan Li. Cnn-based evaluation method of academic innovation effect of american research universities. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Application of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI), pp. 355–360. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lina+Sun+and+Sitan+Li%2E+Cnn%2Dbased+evaluation+method+of+academic+innovation+effect+of+american+research+universities%2E+In+2021+IEEE+International+Conference+on+Industrial+Application+of+Artificial+Intell)
59. Aye Thida. Bert-based dialogue evaluation methods with ruber framework. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Selected Papers from the Annual Conference of Japanese Society of Artificial Intelligence (JSAI 2020), volume 1357, pp. 133. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Aye+Thida%2E+Bert%2Dbased+dialogue+evaluation+methods+with+ruber+framework%2E+In+Advances+in+Artificial+Intelligence%3A+Selected+Papers+from+the+Annual+Conference+of+Japanese+Society+of+Artificial+Intelligenc)
60. Milena Trajanoska, Riste Stojanov, and Dimitar Trajanov. Enhancing knowledge graph construction using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04676, 2023. — [arXiv:2305.04676](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04676) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Milena+Trajanoska%2C+Riste+Stojanov%2C+and+Dimitar+Trajanov%2E+Enhancing+knowledge+graph+construction+using+large+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2305%2E04676%2C+2023%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2305%2E04676%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eo)
61. Thanyalak Ubonsiri. AI-GENERATED EVALUATION: THE INFLUENCE OF CHATGPT EVAL-UATION ON INDIVIDUALS’DECISIONS IN THE IDEA EVALUATION PHASE. PhD thesis, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Thanyalak+Ubonsiri%2E+AI%2DGENERATED+EVALUATION%3A+THE+INFLUENCE+OF+CHATGPT+EVAL%2DUATION+ON+INDIVIDUALS%E2%80%99DECISIONS+IN+THE+IDEA+EVALUATION+PHASE%2E+PhD+thesis%2C+Leopold%2DFranzens%2DUniversita%CC%88t+Innsbruck%2C+2024%2E)
62. Xinru Wang, Hannah Kim, Sajjadur Rahman, Kushan Mitra, and Zhengjie Miao. Human-llm collaborative annotation through effective verification of llm labels. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–21, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Xinru+Wang%2C+Hannah+Kim%2C+Sajjadur+Rahman%2C+Kushan+Mitra%2C+and+Zhengjie+Miao%2E+Human%2Dllm+collaborative+annotation+through+effective+verification+of+llm+labels%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+CHI+Conference+on+Human)
63. Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. [Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wang-2022-self-consistency-improves-chain-thought/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171, 2022.
64. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. [Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wei-2022-chain-thought-prompting-elicits-reasoning/). Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022.
65. Kangda Wei, Aayush Gautam, and Ruihong Huang. Are llms good annotators for discourse-level event relation extraction? arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19568, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Kangda+Wei%2C+Aayush+Gautam%2C+and+Ruihong+Huang%2E+Are+llms+good+annotators+for+discourse%2Dlevel+event+relation+extraction%3F+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2407%2E19568%2C+2024%2E)
66. Felix Wu, Amauri Souza, Tianyi Zhang, Christopher Fifty, Tao Yu, and Kilian Weinberger. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 6861–6871. PMLR, 2019. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Felix+Wu%2C+Amauri+Souza%2C+Tianyi+Zhang%2C+Christopher+Fifty%2C+Tao+Yu%2C+and+Kilian+Weinberger%2E+Simplifying+graph+convolutional+networks%2E+In+International+conference+on+machine+learning%2C+pp%2E+6861%E2%80%936871%2E+PMLR%2C+)
67. Yi Xu, Bo Xue, Shuqian Sheng, Cheng Deng, Jiaxin Ding, Zanwei Shen, Luoyi Fu, Xinbing Wang, and Chenghu Zhou. Good idea or not, representation of llm could tell. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13712, 2024. — [arXiv:2409.13712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13712) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Yi+Xu%2C+Bo+Xue%2C+Shuqian+Sheng%2C+Cheng+Deng%2C+Jiaxin+Ding%2C+Zanwei+Shen%2C+Luoyi+Fu%2C+Xinbing+Wang%2C+and+Chenghu+Zhou%2E+Good+idea+or+not%2C+representation+of+llm+could+tell%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2409%2E13712%2C+2024%2E)
68. Rui Yang, Boming Yang, Sixun Ouyang, Tianwei She, Aosong Feng, Yuang Jiang, Freddy Lecue, Jinghui Lu, and Irene Li. Graphusion: Leveraging large language models for scientific knowledge graph fusion and construction in nlp education, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2407.10794. [↗](https://arxiv.org/abs/)
69. Jia-Yu Yao, Kun-Peng Ning, Zhen-Hui Liu, Mu-Nan Ning, and Li Yuan. Llm lies: Hallucinations are not bugs, but features as adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01469, 2023a. — [arXiv:2310.01469](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01469) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jia%2DYu+Yao%2C+Kun%2DPeng+Ning%2C+Zhen%2DHui+Liu%2C+Mu%2DNan+Ning%2C+and+Li+Yuan%2E+Llm+lies%3A+Hallucinations+are+not+bugs%2C+but+features+as+adversarial+examples%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2310%2E01469%2C+2023a%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2310%2E01)
70. Liang Yao, Jiazhen Peng, Chengsheng Mao, and Yuan Luo. Exploring large language models for knowledge graph completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13916, 2023b. — [arXiv:2308.13916](https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13916) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Liang+Yao%2C+Jiazhen+Peng%2C+Chengsheng+Mao%2C+and+Yuan+Luo%2E+Exploring+large+language+models+for+knowledge+graph+completion%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2308%2E13916%2C+2023b%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2308%2E13916%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fab)
71. Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shunyu+Yao%2C+Dian+Yu%2C+Jeffrey+Zhao%2C+Izhak+Shafran%2C+Tom+Griffiths%2C+Yuan+Cao%2C+and+Karthik+Narasimhan%2E+Tree+of+thoughts%3A+Deliberate+problem+solving+with+large+language+models%2E+Advances+in+Neural+Informati)
72. Weizhe Yuan, Pengfei Liu, and Graham Neubig. [Can we automate scientific reviewing?](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yuan-2021-automate-scientific-reviewing/) Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 75:171–212, 2022.
73. Collin Zhang, John X Morris, and Vitaly Shmatikov. Extracting prompts by inverting llm outputs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15012, 2024a. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Collin+Zhang%2C+John+X+Morris%2C+and+Vitaly+Shmatikov%2E+Extracting+prompts+by+inverting+llm+outputs%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2405%2E15012%2C+2024a%2E)
74. Yizhuo Zhang, Heng Wang, Shangbin Feng, Zhaoxuan Tan, Xiaochuang Han, Tianxing He, and Yulia Tsvetkov. Can llm graph reasoning generalize beyond pattern memorization? arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15992, 2024b. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Yizhuo+Zhang%2C+Heng+Wang%2C+Shangbin+Feng%2C+Zhaoxuan+Tan%2C+Xiaochuang+Han%2C+Tianxing+He%2C+and+Yulia+Tsvetkov%2E+Can+llm+graph+reasoning+generalize+beyond+pattern+memorization%3F+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2406%2E15992%2C+)
75. Yue Zhang, Yafu Li, Leyang Cui, Deng Cai, Lemao Liu, Tingchen Fu, Xinting Huang, Enbo Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yulong Chen, et al. Siren’s song in the ai ocean: a survey on hallucination in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.[01219, 2023](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhang-2023-siren-s-song-ai-ocean/).
76. Zhi-Wu Zhang, Xiao-Yuan Jing, and Tie-Jian Wang. Label propagation based semi-supervised learning for software defect prediction. Automated Software Engineering, 24:47–69, 2017. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zhi%2DWu+Zhang%2C+Xiao%2DYuan+Jing%2C+and+Tie%2DJian+Wang%2E+Label+propagation+based+semi%2Dsupervised+learning+for+software+defect+prediction%2E+Automated+Software+Engineering%2C+24%3A47%E2%80%9369%2C+2017%2E)
77. Shen Zheng, Jie Huang, and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang. Why does chatgpt fall short in providing truthful answers? arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10513, 2023. — [arXiv:2304.10513](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10513) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shen+Zheng%2C+Jie+Huang%2C+and+Kevin+Chen%2DChuan+Chang%2E+Why+does+chatgpt+fall+short+in+providing+truthful+answers%3F+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2304%2E10513%2C+2023%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2304%2E10513%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fabs%2F2304%2E105)
78. Yuqi Zhu, Xiaohan Wang, Jing Chen, Shuofei Qiao, Yixin Ou, Yunzhi Yao, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. Llms for knowledge graph construction and reasoning: Recent capabilities and future opportunities. World Wide Web, 27(5):58, 2024. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Yuqi+Zhu%2C+Xiaohan+Wang%2C+Jing+Chen%2C+Shuofei+Qiao%2C+Yixin+Ou%2C+Yunzhi+Yao%2C+Shumin+Deng%2C+Huajun+Chen%2C+and+Ningyu+Zhang%2E+Llms+for+knowledge+graph+construction+and+reasoning%3A+Recent+capabilities+and+future+o)

*Updated 3 November 2026*