---
title: "An Egypto-Semitic Comparison — Hodge 2026"
description: "Hodge sets out to measure how close Egyptian is to Semitic in vocabulary."
authors: ["Carleton T. Hodge"]
year: 2026
venue: "Folia Orientalia 17"
source: "https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/2851"
licence: "CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; Folia Orientalia)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hodge-2026-egypto-semitic-comparison/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hodge-2026-egypto-semitic-comparison/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2026](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2026/page/4/) / An Egypto-Semitic Comparison

# An Egypto-Semitic Comparison

**Authors:** Carleton T. Hodge · **Year:** 2026 · **Venue:** Folia Orientalia 17 · **Licence:** [CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; Folia Orientalia)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/2851) · [PDF](https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/download/2851/2183) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W7172071162)

**Citations:** 0 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14)

## Summary
Hodge sets out to measure how close Egyptian is to Semitic in vocabulary. He works within a family he calls Lisramic (usually termed Afroasiatic). He uses Bergsträsser's list of 172 common Semitic roots as a stand-in for the proto-Semitic lexicon. Two pairs that share a root are merged, leaving 170 items. For each root he looks for Egyptian counterparts that fit a deliberately conservative table of regular consonant correspondences, avoiding elaborate sound-change explanations. Every candidate gets a confidence grade: clear cognate, cognate with a meaning shift, survival only as a hieroglyph's sound value, cognate with a notable formal difference, conjectured cognate, or merely "of interest". About 42% of the Semitic list (72 items) turns out to have plausible Egyptian cognates, and he expects this to approach 50% with further research. His conclusion is that Egyptian is not a Semitic language but is closely related to it. The result also gives a footing for reconstructing a shared Egypto-Semitic sound system before the other branches are brought in.

## Key points
- The base corpus is Bergsträsser's (1928) list of 172 Semitic roots, renumbered to 170 items. "Son"/"daughter" are counted as 7a/7b and "go up"/"upon" as 105a/105b.
- The grading counts are: 5.1 clear = 17, 5.2 semantic shift = 13, 5.3 graphic-only = 4, 5.4 formal difference = 15, 5.5 conjectured = 23. A further 43 items are only possibly relevant (category 6).
- Overall there are 72 cognates (42.35%) and 98 non-cognates. In 27 cases (about 16%) the cognate is also the ordinary Egyptian word for that meaning. Leaving out the conjectured class still gives 49 cognates.
- The method assumes that proto-roots were mostly biconsonantal, so a match on two of three consonants is accepted. It also assumes the earliest-attested languages best preserve the old phonology.
- The comparison is explicitly one-directional: it measures Egyptian against Semitic, not the reverse. It also screened out a late loan (No. 23).

## Interesting ideas
- Each match gets an ordered confidence grade instead of a yes/no label, so headline figures can be reported both with and without the shaky tiers. This makes it clear how much of the result depends on weak evidence. — For Mova (learn): Silver-data items could carry tiers based on witness-parser agreement, and accuracy could be reported with and without the low tiers to show how much they matter.
- Hodge accepts only matches that obey a small, explicit correspondence table. Clever ad-hoc explanations are not thrown out but parked until better evidence arrives, which keeps the core result clean without losing hypotheses. — For Mova (learn): Self-induced repair rules could be applied only when they fit an established pattern table, with borderline rules quarantined in a pending pool rather than deleted.
- He notes that a list-based measure is asymmetric: starting from one side's list answers a different question than starting from the other side's. Making that direction explicit avoids overclaiming. — For Mova (learn): Evaluations comparing two parsers or UD dialects should state which side's inventory is the reference and, ideally, run both directions as a check.
- He separates "some cognate exists" from "the cognate is the everyday word for that meaning", the latter being the stronger signal. This distinguishes core overlap from peripheral overlap. — For Mova (world): When mapping concepts across WordNet/FrameNet/Wikidata, a match on the most frequent sense could be weighted above a match on a rare sense.
- He points to "semantic bundling", where one root covers naturally linked meanings such as green colour and vegetables. Recognising such bundles explains meaning shifts that would otherwise look accidental. — For Mova (world): The ontology could record typical bundle links, such as a property mapping to the things that have it, to help resolve polysemous lemmas in the world model.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

Fields: [Linguistics & languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/linguistics/)

Topics: [Semitic languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/semitic-languages/)

## Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{hodge2026egypto,
  title = {{An Egypto-Semitic Comparison}},
  author = {Hodge, Carleton T.},
  booktitle = {Folia Orientalia 17},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/2851}
}
```

- [← previous An Assortment of Articles in a Ugaritic Text](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/watson-2026-assortment-articles-ugaritic-text/)
- [next → An LLM-Based Assistant for Debt Waiver Court Procedures](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/padro-2026-llm-based-assistant-debt-waiver/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2026](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2026/page/4/)

## References

36 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Albright, William F. 1923. The principles of Egyptian phonological' development. RT 40: 64-70. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Albright%2C+William+F%2E+1923%2E+The+principles+of+Egyptian+phonological%27+development%2E+RT+40%3A+64%2D70%2E)
2. Id. 1927. Notes on Egypto-Semitic etymology. III. JAOS 47: 198-237. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1927%2E+Notes+on+Egypto%2DSemitic+etymology%2E+III%2E+JAOS+47%3A+198%2D237%2E)
3. Barr, James. 1968. Comparative Philology and the Text of the Old: Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Barr%2C+James%2E+1968%2E+Comparative+Philology+and+the+Text+of+the+Old%3A+Testament%2E+Oxford%3A+Clarendon+Press%2E)
4. Beeston, A. F. L. 1973. The heart of Shanfara. JSS 18: 257-58 .. Bender, M. Lionel. 1975. Omotic: a New Afroasiatic Language Family. Carbondale: University Nuseum. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Beeston%2C+A%2E+F%2E+L%2E+1973%2E+The+heart+of+Shanfara%2E+JSS+18%3A+257%2D58+%2E%2E+Bender%2C+M%2E+Lionel%2E+1975%2E+Omotic%3A+a+New+Afroasiatic+Language+Family%2E+Carbondale%3A+University+Nuseum%2E)
5. Bergstrasser, Gotthelf. 1928. Einfuhrung in die semitischen Sprachen .. Miinich: Max Hueber. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bergstrasser%2C+Gotthelf%2E+1928%2E+Einfuhrung+in+die+semitischen+Sprachen+%2E%2E+Miinich%3A+Max+Hueber%2E)
6. Black, Paul. 1972. Cushitic and Omotic classification. Language-Sciences 23: 27-28. Bro ck elm ann, Carl. 1908 [1961]. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen. Vol. 1. Hildesheim: Georg Olms .. Brugsch, Heinrich. 1891. Die Aegyptologie. Leipzig: W. Friedrich. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Black%2C+Paul%2E+1972%2E+Cushitic+and+Omotic+classification%2E+Language%2DSciences+23%3A+27%2D28%2E+Bro+ck+elm+ann%2C+Carl%2E+1908+%5B1961%5D%2E+Grundriss+der+vergleichenden+Grammatik+der+semitischen+Sprachen%2E+Vol%2E+1%2E+Hildeshe)
7. Budge, E. A. Wallis. 1898. The Book of the Dead. 'l'ext. London:. Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner and Co. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Budge%2C+E%2E+A%2E+Wallis%2E+1898%2E+The+Book+of+the+Dead%2E+%27l%27ext%2E+London%3A%2E+Kegan+Paul%2C+Trench%2C+Triibner+and+Co%2E)
8. Calice, Franz. 1901. Zur agyptisch-semitischen Wurzelverwandtschaft .. ZAS 39: 146-47. I d. 1936. Grundlagen der agyptisch-semitischen W ortvergleichung. Ed. by Heinrich Bales. Vienna: Selbstverlag des Orientalischen Institutes der Universitat. (WZKM Beiheft 1). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Calice%2C+Franz%2E+1901%2E+Zur+agyptisch%2Dsemitischen+Wurzelverwandtschaft+%2E%2E+ZAS+39%3A+146%2D47%2E+I+d%2E+1936%2E+Grundlagen+der+agyptisch%2Dsemitischen+W+ortvergleichung%2E+Ed%2E+by+Heinrich+Bales%2E+Vienna%3A+Selbstverlag+de)
9. Cohen, David. 1970. Etudes de linguistique semitique et arabe. (Janua Linguarum, Series Practica, 81). The Hague: Mouton. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cohen%2C+David%2E+1970%2E+Etudes+de+linguistique+semitique+et+arabe%2E+%28Janua+Linguarum%2C+Series+Practica%2C+81%29%2E+The+Hague%3A+Mouton%2E)
10. Cohen, Marcel. 1947. Essai comparatif sur le vocab~laire et la phonetique du chamito-semitique. (Bibliotheque de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes, 291) Paris: Honore Champion. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cohen%2C+Marcel%2E+1947%2E+Essai+comparatif+sur+le+vocab%7Elaire+et+la+phonetique+du+chamito%2Dsemitique%2E+%28Bibliotheque+de+l%27Ecole+des+Hautes+Etudes%2C+291%29+Paris%3A+Honore+Champion%2E)
11. Crum, W. E. 1939. Coptic Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. de Buck, .Adrian. 1967. Grammaire elementaire du moyen egyptien. Tr. by B. van de Walle and J. Vergote. Leiden: E. J. Brill. • Diakonoff, I. M. 1965. Semito-Hamitic Languages. Moscow: Nauka. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Crum%2C+W%2E+E%2E+1939%2E+Coptic+Dictionary%2E+Oxford%3A+Clarendon+Press%2E+de+Buck%2C+%2EAdrian%2E+1967%2E+Grammaire+elementaire+du+moyen+egyptien%2E+Tr%2E+by+B%2E+van+de+Walle+and+J%2E+Vergote%2E+Leiden%3A+E%2E+J%2E+Brill%2E+%E2%80%A2+Diakonoff%2C+)
12. Edel, Elmar. 1955. Altagyptische Grammatik .Vol. 1. (Analecta Orientalia 34) Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute. .. Ember, Aaron. 1911. Semito-Egyptian sound-9.hanges. ZAS 49: 87-92. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Edel%2C+Elmar%2E+1955%2E+Altagyptische+Grammatik+%2EVol%2E+1%2E+%28Analecta+Orientalia+34%29+Rome%3A+Pontifical+Biblical+Institute%2E+%2E%2E+Ember%2C+Aaron%2E+1911%2E+Semito%2DEgyptian+sound%2D9%2Ehanges%2E+ZAS+49%3A+87%2D92%2E)
13. Id. 1911. Kindred Semito-Egyptian words. ZAS 49: 93--::--94. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1911%2E+Kindred+Semito%2DEgyptian+words%2E+ZAS+49%3A+93%2D%2D%3A%3A%2D%2D94%2E)
14. Id. 1912. Notes on the relation of Egyptian and Semitic. ZAS 50: 86-90. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1912%2E+Notes+on+the+relation+of+Egyptian+and+Semitic%2E+ZAS+50%3A+86%2D90%2E)
15. Id. 1914. Kindred Semito-Egyptian words. Z.AS 5i: 110-21. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1914%2E+Kindred+Semito%2DEgyptian+words%2E+Z%2EAS+5i%3A+110%2D21%2E)
16. Erman, Adolf. 1892. Das Verhaltniss des Aegyptischen zu den semitischen Sprachen. ZDMG 46: 93-129. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Erman%2C+Adolf%2E+1892%2E+Das+Verhaltniss+des+Aegyptischen+zu+den+semitischen+Sprachen%2E+ZDMG+46%3A+93%2D129%2E)
17. Erman, Adolf and Hermann Grapow. 1957. Worterbuch der aegyptischen Sprache. 6 vols. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. (Abbreviated: Wb). Faulkner, Raymond 0. 1962. A Concise Dictionary of Middle Egyptian. Oxford: At the University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Erman%2C+Adolf+and+Hermann+Grapow%2E+1957%2E+Worterbuch+der+aegyptischen+Sprache%2E+6+vols%2E+Berlin%3A+Akademie+Verlag%2E+%28Abbreviated%3A+Wb%29%2E+Faulkner%2C+Raymond+0%2E+1962%2E+A+Concise+Dictionary+of+Middle+Egyptian%2E+Oxfo)
18. Id. 1969. The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1969%2E+The+Ancient+Egyptian+Pyramid+Texts%2E+Oxford%3A+Clarendon+Press%2E)
19. Gardiner, Alan H. 1916. Notes on the Story of Sinuhe. Paris: H. Champion. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gardiner%2C+Alan+H%2E+1916%2E+Notes+on+the+Story+of+Sinuhe%2E+Paris%3A+H%2E+Champion%2E)
20. Id. 1948. Ancient Egyptian Onomastica. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Id. 1957. Egyptian Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1948%2E+Ancient+Egyptian+Onomastica%2E+3+vols%2E+Oxford%3A+Oxford+University+Press%2E+%E2%80%A2+Id%2E+1957%2E+Egyptian+Grammar%2E+3rd+ed%2E+London%3A+Oxford+University+Press%2E)
21. Gordon, Cyrus H. 1957. Egypto-Semitica. RdSO 32: 269-77. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gordon%2C+Cyrus+H%2E+1957%2E+Egypto%2DSemitica%2E+RdSO+32%3A+269%2D77%2E)
22. Id. 1965. Ugaritic Textbook. Glossary, Indices. (.Analecta Orientalia, 38) Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute. Grande,· B. M. l 972. Vvedenie v Sravniteljnoe Izucenie Semitskix Jazykov. Moscow: Nauka. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1965%2E+Ugaritic+Textbook%2E+Glossary%2C+Indices%2E+%28%2EAnalecta+Orientalia%2C+38%29+Rome%3A+Pontifical+Biblical+Institute%2E+Grande%2C%C2%B7+B%2E+M%2E+l+972%2E+Vvedenie+v+Sravniteljnoe+Izucenie+Semitskix+Jazykov%2E+Moscow%3A+Nauka)
23. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1955. Internal a-plurals in Afroasiatic (Hamito-Semitic) . .Afrikanistische Studien Diedrich Westermann zum 80. Geburtstag gewidmet. (Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Institut fiir Orientforschung, 26) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Greenberg%2C+Joseph+H%2E+1955%2E+Internal+a%2Dplurals+in+Afroasiatic+%28Hamito%2DSemitic%29+%2E+%2EAfrikanistische+Studien+Diedrich+Westermann+zum+80%2E+Geburtstag+gewidmet%2E+%28Deutsche+Akademie+der+Wissenschaften+zu+Berli)
24. Hodge, Carleton T. 1966. Hausa-Egyptian establishment . .Anthropological Linguistics 8.1: 40-57. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hodge%2C+Carleton+T%2E+1966%2E+Hausa%2DEgyptian+establishment+%2E+%2EAnthropological+Linguistics+8%2E1%3A+40%2D57%2E)
25. Id. 1969. Egyptian g amid Afroasiatic. American Oriental Society Middle West Branch, Semi-centennial Volume, ed. by Denis Sinor, pp. 104-110. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1969%2E+Egyptian+g+amid+Afroasiatic%2E+American+Oriental+Society+Middle+West+Branch%2C+Semi%2Dcentennial+Volume%2C+ed%2E+by+Denis+Sinor%2C+pp%2E+104%2D110%2E+Bloomington%3A+Indiana+University+Press%2E)
26. Id. 1975. Egyptian and survival. (Hamito-Semitica, ed. James and Theodora. Bynon, pp. 171-191. The Hague: Mouton). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1975%2E+Egyptian+and+survival%2E+%28Hamito%2DSemitica%2C+ed%2E+James+and+Theodora%2E+Bynon%2C+pp%2E+171%2D191%2E+The+Hague%3A+Mouton%29%2E)
27. Id. 1972. Lisramic. Language Sciences 20: 13-16. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1972%2E+Lisramic%2E+Language+Sciences+20%3A+13%2D16%2E)
28. FOLIA TOME ORIENTALIA XVII 1976: Hommel, Fritz. 1894. Uber den Grad der Verwandtschaft des Altiigypti-schen mit dern Semitischen. Beitrage zur Assyriologie 2: 342-'----58. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=FOLIA+TOME+ORIENTALIA+XVII+1976%3A+Hommel%2C+Fritz%2E+1894%2E+Uber+den+Grad+der+Verwandtschaft+des+Altiigypti%2Dschen+mit+dern+Semitischen%2E+Beitrage+zur+Assyriologie+2%3A+342%2D%27%2D%2D%2D%2D58%2E)
29. Leslau, Wolf. 1949. Review of Essai comparatif sur le vocabulaire et la phonetique :au chamito-semitique, by Marcel Cohen. Language 25: 312-16. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Leslau%2C+Wolf%2E+1949%2E+Review+of+Essai+comparatif+sur+le+vocabulaire+et+la+phonetique+%3Aau+chamito%2Dsemitique%2C+by+Marcel+Cohen%2E+Language+25%3A+312%2D16%2E)
30. Id. 1962. Semitic cind Egyptian comparisons. JNES 21: 44-9. Moscati, Sabatino; Spitaler, Anton; Ullendorff, Edward, and ·vvolfram von Soden. 1964. An Introduction to the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages: Phonology and Morphology, ed. by Sabatino Moscati. (Porta Linguarum Orientalium, N. S., 6) Leiden: Otto Harrassowitz. Miiller, W. ·vv. 1961. .Athiopisches ziir semitisch-i:igyptischen Wortver-gleiohung. Museon 74: 199-205. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Id%2E+1962%2E+Semitic+cind+Egyptian+comparisons%2E+JNES+21%3A+44%2D9%2E+Moscati%2C+Sabatino%3B+Spitaler%2C+Anton%3B+Ullendorff%2C+Edward%2C+and+%C2%B7vvolfram+von+Soden%2E+1964%2E+An+Introduction+to+the+Comparative+Grammar+of+the+Sem)
31. Newman, Paul and Roxana Ma. 1966. Comparative Chadic: phonology and lexicon. Journal of African L_anguages 5: 218-51. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Newman%2C+Paul+and+Roxana+Ma%2E+1966%2E+Comparative+Chadic%3A+phonology+and+lexicon%2E+Journal+of+African+L%5Fanguages+5%3A+218%2D51%2E)
32. Rabin, Chaim. 1963. The origin of the subdivisions of Semitic [in:] Hebrew and Semitic Studies Presented to Godfrey Rolles Driver, ed. by D. vV. Thomas and W. D. McHardy, pp. 105-15. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rabin%2C+Chaim%2E+1963%2E+The+origin+of+the+subdivisions+of+Semitic+%5Bin%3A%5D+Hebrew+and+Semitic+Studies+Presented+to+Godfrey+Rolles+Driver%2C+ed%2E+by+D%2E+vV%2E+Thomas+and+W%2E+D%2E+McHardy%2C+pp%2E+105%2D15%2E+Oxford%3A+Clarendon)
33. Sethe, Kurt. 1916. Von Zahlen und Za.hlworten bei clen alten .Agyptern. Strassburg: K. J. Triibner. Soden, Wolfram von. 1952. Grunclriss der akkadisohen Grammatik. (Analecta Orientalia, 33) Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sethe%2C+Kurt%2E+1916%2E+Von+Zahlen+und+Za%2Ehlworten+bei+clen+alten+%2EAgyptern%2E+Strassburg%3A+K%2E+J%2E+Triibner%2E+Soden%2C+Wolfram+von%2E+1952%2E+Grunclriss+der+akkadisohen+Grammatik%2E+%28Analecta+Orientalia%2C+33%29+Rome%3A+Pont)
34. Spiegelberg, Wilhelm. 1925. Demotische Grammatik. Heidelberg: C. Winter. Vergo t e, J. 1945. Phonetique historique de l' egyptien. Les consonnes. (Bibliotheque du Museon, 19) Lou:vain: Bureaux du Museon. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Spiegelberg%2C+Wilhelm%2E+1925%2E+Demotische+Grammatik%2E+Heidelberg%3A+C%2E+Winter%2E+Vergo+t+e%2C+J%2E+1945%2E+Phonetique+historique+de+l%27+egyptien%2E+Les+consonnes%2E+%28Bibliotheque+du+Museon%2C+19%29+Lou%3Avain%3A+Bureaux+du+Muse)
35. Vycichl, Werner. 1958. Gruncllagen der agyptisch-semitischen Wort-1 vergleichung. MDAIK 16: 367-405. 'ii'iTestendorf, Wolfhart. 1962. Grammatik cler medizinischen Texte. (Grundriss der medizin der alten Agypter, 8) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Vycichl%2C+Werner%2E+1958%2E+Gruncllagen+der+agyptisch%2Dsemitischen+Wort%2D1+vergleichung%2E+MDAIK+16%3A+367%2D405%2E+%27ii%27iTestendorf%2C+Wolfhart%2E+1962%2E+Grammatik+cler+medizinischen+Texte%2E+%28Grundriss+der+medizin+der+alt)
36. Zaborski, Andrzej. 1971. Biconsonantal verbal roots in Semitic. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego 269: 51-98. R. J. HAYWARD A QUESTION IN OROMO MORPHOPHONOLOG [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zaborski%2C+Andrzej%2E+1971%2E+Biconsonantal+verbal+roots+in+Semitic%2E+Zeszyty+Naukowe+Uniwersytetu+Jagiellonskiego+269%3A+51%2D98%2E+R%2E+J%2E+HAYWARD+A+QUESTION+IN+OROMO+MORPHOPHONOLOG)