---
title: "The Ethio-Semitic Possessive Pronouns as Predicalizers in"
description: "That expression describes the state of the verb's subject or object while the action happens, rather than describing the action… 11 references."
authors: ["Olga Kapeliuk"]
year: 2013
venue: "Aethiopica 1"
source: "https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/aethiopica/article/view/652"
doi: "10.15460/aethiopica.1.1.652"
licence: "CC BY-SA (journal licence per DOAJ; Aethiopica)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kapeliuk-2013-ethio-semitic-possessive-pronouns-predicalizers/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kapeliuk-2013-ethio-semitic-possessive-pronouns-predicalizers/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2013](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2013/page/3/) / The Ethio-Semitic Possessive Pronouns as Predicalizers in Historical Perspective

# The Ethio-Semitic Possessive Pronouns as Predicalizers in Historical Perspective

**Authors:** [Olga Kapeliuk](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/olga-kapeliuk/) · **Year:** 2013 · **Venue:** [Aethiopica 1](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/aethiopica/) ([Aethiopica 2013](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/aethiopica/2013/)) · **Publisher:** [Hamburg University Press](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/publishers/hamburg-university-press/) · **Licence:** [CC BY-SA (journal licence per DOAJ; Aethiopica)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://doi.org/10.15460/aethiopica.1.1.652) · [PDF](https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/aethiopica/article/download/652/661) · [DOI 10.15460/aethiopica.1.1.652](https://doi.org/10.15460/aethiopica.1.1.652) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W1582227075)

**Citations:** 1 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14)

## Summary
Kapeliuk's article appeared in Aethiopica 1 (1998); the year 2013 in the request does not match the source. It looks at cases where an Ethio-Semitic suffix pronoun that normally marks an owner does something else: it acts as the subject of an implied clause meaning "X being Y." Attached to a noun, adjective or participle, such a pronoun creates a circumstantial expression. That expression describes the state of the verb's subject or object while the action happens, rather than describing the action itself. The author compares parallel Bible verses in Ge'ez, Tigrinya and Amharic, checks them against Greek and English versions, and adds evidence from chronicles and older grammars, mainly Praetorius. Her main test is substitution: these nominal phrases can be swapped for full subordinate clauses built on a gerund. That shows a predicative link (Jespersen's nexus) between the noun and its "possessive" pronoun, and it is why she calls these pronouns predicalizers. Historically, the construction looks like a Ge'ez innovation that the modern languages mostly replaced with gerund clauses, leaving only a few fixed residues. The study shows how a morpheme's surface category can hide its real syntactic role.

## Key points
- **Main example (Mark 8:3, "if I send them home hungry"):**
  - Tigrinya uses the word for "fast" plus a 3rd person plural suffix, with no adverbial marker at all.
  - Amharic uses the same combination but adds the accusative marker -n, which works as a ḥāl-type accusative of state.
- **Tigrinya lost the accusative:** despite its reputation for being conservative, Tigrinya dropped the historical accusative in both form and function. Amharic, by contrast, keeps close to Ge'ez usage, including the -a vowel in the gerund.
- **Surviving modern residues:** the pattern lives on in a few fixed expressions.
  - Amharic has forms for "naked" and "empty-handed," plus "alone"; the "naked" form is restricted to the adverbial use only.
  - In Tigrinya, a former adjective (now an adverb meaning "only/alone") can take the predicalizing suffix.
- **Gerund replacement:** in the modern languages, the Ge'ez predicalizing suffix is often replaced by a gerund of "to be." Genesis 38:11 ("remain unwed in your father's house") illustrates this.
- **Comparison with Arabic:** in classical Arabic, the ḥāl is always accusative and never carries a subject suffix. The author therefore treats subject suffixes on participles and adjectives as an Ethiopian feature. She suggests it was modelled on the Ge'ez gerund with a suffixed subject and was limited to bodily or mental states of humans.
- **Sources used:**
  - Tigrinya Bible (Asmara, 1992).
  - Amharic Bible (1980 E.C., reprinted 1994).
  - Ge'ez editions by Littmann and Dillmann.
  - Kane's Amharic and Tigrinya dictionaries.

## Interesting ideas
- A marker that looks possessive on the surface can actually be the subject of a hidden "be" predication; deciding which one it is depends on how the phrase relates to the main verb.
- Some modifiers describe a participant's state during the event, not the manner of the action, and they stand in apposition to the verb's subject or object.
- The paper shows a predicative link by checking whether a nominal phrase can be replaced with a full subordinate clause without changing the meaning.
- Comparing translations of the same verse across related languages shows the function of a construction, because one language marks explicitly what another leaves unmarked.
- The same function can be zero-marked (Tigrinya), case-marked (Amharic), or expressed as a clause (gerund), so analysis should rest on function rather than form.

## For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

- **I1** (frames): in English phrases like "his being absent" or "with her hands empty," treat the possessor of a state noun as the holder of a state frame rather than an owner.
- **I2** (world): attach depictives such as "came home hungry" or "fled naked" to the participant as a state limited to the event's time span, instead of to the event.
- **I3** (learn): use clause-paraphrase equivalence as a check on silver labels for depictives and absolutes, with non-substitutable phrases as negative controls.
- **I4** (learn): treat aligned translations or paraphrases as extra witnesses, so that a phrase whose function is unmarked in one version can borrow evidence from a version where it is marked.
- **I5** (tree): ensure bare depictive adjectives and nouns ("left empty-handed") get a consistent UD relation such as xcomp or advcl:pred across the different surface forms.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

📚 Shelves (2): [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 16,039 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 15,891 works

🧭 Topics (1): [Semitic languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/semitic-languages/) · 2,908 works

## Cite

Cite as: Olga Kapeliuk. 2013. The Ethio-Semitic Possessive Pronouns as Predicalizers in Historical Perspective. Aethiopica 1.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{kapeliuk2013ethio,
  title = {{The Ethio-Semitic Possessive Pronouns as Predicalizers in Historical Perspective}},
  author = {Olga Kapeliuk},
  booktitle = {Aethiopica 1},
  year = {2013},
  doi = {10.15460/aethiopica.1.1.652},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.15460/aethiopica.1.1.652}
}
```

- [← previous Syntactic and Semantic Rules in Old English Adjective Formation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/escarza-2013-syntactic-semantic-rules-old-english/)
- [next → The Magi in Ethiopic Tradition](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/witakowski-2013-magi-ethiopic-tradition/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2013](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2013/page/3/)

## References

11 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. T HOMAS K ANE , Amharic߃English Dictionary, 2 vols, Wiesbaden 1990 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=T+HOMAS+K+ANE+%2C+Amharic%DF%83English+Dictionary%2C+2+vols%2C+Wiesbaden+1990)
2. K ANE , Tigrinya T HOMAS K ANE , Tigrinya߃English Dictionary, forthcoming K APELIUK (1973) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=K+ANE+%2C+Tigrinya+T+HOMAS+K+ANE+%2C+Tigrinya%DF%83English+Dictionary%2C+forthcoming+K+APELIUK+%281973%29)
3. O LGA K APELIUK , ߋTraitement spÈcial du corps et de l߈Áme dans la syntaxe Èthiopienneߌ, Journal of Ethiopian Studies, 11 (1973) 143߃160 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=O+LGA+K+APELIUK+%2C+%DF%8BTraitement+sp%C3%88cial+du+corps+et+de+l%DF%88%C3%81me+dans+la+syntaxe+%C3%88thiopienne%DF%8C%2C+Journal+of+Ethiopian+Studies%2C+11+%281973%29+143%DF%83160)
4. O LGA K APELIUK , ߋQuelques remarques sur l߈emploi de l߈accusatif en sÈmitique Èthiopien et en arabe classiqueߌ, Studia Orientalia Memoriae D.H. Baneth Dedicata, Jerusalem 1979, 225߃238 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=O+LGA+K+APELIUK+%2C+%DF%8BQuelques+remarques+sur+l%DF%88emploi+de+l%DF%88accusatif+en+s%C3%88mitique+%C3%88thiopien+et+en+arabe+classique%DF%8C%2C+Studia+Orientalia+Memoriae+D%2EH%2E+Baneth+Dedicata%2C+Jerusalem+1979%2C+225%DF%83238)
5. K APELIUK (1988a) O LGA K APELIUK , Nominalization in Amharic, Wiesbaden 1988 (Aethiopistische Forschungen 23) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=K+APELIUK+%281988a%29+O+LGA+K+APELIUK+%2C+Nominalization+in+Amharic%2C+Wiesbaden+1988+%28Aethiopistische+Forschungen+23%29)
6. K APELIUK (1988b) O LGA K APELIUK , ߋAbstract nouns as a transformation of copula sentencesߌ, Grazer Linguistischen Studien, 30 (1988) 69߃77 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=K+APELIUK+%281988b%29+O+LGA+K+APELIUK+%2C+%DF%8BAbstract+nouns+as+a+transformation+of+copula+sentences%DF%8C%2C+Grazer+Linguistischen+Studien%2C+30+%281988%29+69%DF%8377)
7. O LGA K APELIUK , ߋAppurtenance as a Linguistic conceptߌ, Folia Linguistica 23 (1989) 341߃351 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=O+LGA+K+APELIUK+%2C+%DF%8BAppurtenance+as+a+Linguistic+concept%DF%8C%2C+Folia+Linguistica+23+%281989%29+341%DF%83351)
8. O LGA K APELIUK , ߋLes fonction multiples du pronom suffixe d߈objet et de la prÈposition к en guÇzeߌ, Orbus Aethiopicus, Studia in Honorem Stanislaus Chojnacki, edited by P.O. Scholz 1992 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=O+LGA+K+APELIUK+%2C+%DF%8BLes+fonction+multiples+du+pronom+suffixe+d%DF%88objet+et+de+la+pr%C3%88position+%D0%BA+en+gu%C3%87ze%DF%8C%2C+Orbus+Aethiopicus%2C+Studia+in+Honorem+Stanislaus+Chojnacki%2C+edited+by+P%2EO%2E+Scholz+1992)
9. W OLF L ESLAU , Documents Tigrinya, Paris 1941 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=W+OLF+L+ESLAU+%2C+Documents+Tigrinya%2C+Paris+1941)
10. The Ethio-Semitic Possessive Pronouns as Predicalizers in Historical Perspective L ESLAU (1987) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+Ethio%2DSemitic+Possessive+Pronouns+as+Predicalizers+in+Historical+Perspective+L+ESLAU+%281987%29)
11. W OLF L ESLAU , Comparative Dictionary of Geʞez, Wiesbaden 1987 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=W+OLF+L+ESLAU+%2C+Comparative+Dictionary+of+Ge%CA%9Eez%2C+Wiesbaden+1987)

*Updated 29 October 2026*
