--- title: "Who cites What Can Natural Language — 28 citing papers" description: "28 papers of the Elamur Research library cite «What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?», found in their bibliographies…" canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kuznetsov-2024-natural-language-processing-peer/cited-by/" --- [Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kuznetsov-2024-natural-language-processing-peer/cited-by/) [home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer…](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kuznetsov-2024-natural-language-processing-peer/) / cited by # Who cites «What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?» 28 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 16 with a page here, the most cited first · [← back to «What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?»](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kuznetsov-2024-natural-language-processing-peer/) 1. [**LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research arXiv:2501.04306**Ziming Luo, Zonglin Yang, Zexin Xu, et al.*2025 · 39 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/luo-2025-llm4sr-survey-large-language/) 2. [**AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews arXiv:2408.10365**Keith Tyser, Ben Segev, Gaston Longhitano, et al.*2024 · 34 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tyser-2024-ai-driven-review-systems/) 3. **[Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/eger-2025-transforming-science-large-language-models/) [ACM Computing Surveys](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acm-computing-surveys/)**Steffen Eger, Yong Cao, Jennifer D'Souza, et al.*2025 · 25 citations* 4. **[AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/chen-2025-ai4research-survey-artificial-intelligence/) [Science China Information Sciences](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/science-china-information-sciences/)**Qiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.*2025 · 21 citations* 5. [**Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025 arXiv:2504.09737**Nitya Thakkar, Mert Yuksekgonul, Jake Silberg, et al.*2025 · 21 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/thakkar-2025-llm-feedback-enhance-review/) 6. [**Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards arXiv:2505.04966**Jaeho Kim, Yunseok Lee, Seulki Lee*2025 · 13 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kim-2025-position-ai-conference-peer-review/) 7. [**Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review arXiv:2410.03019**Sungduk Yu, Man Luo, Avinash Madasu, et al.*2024 · 11 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yu-2024-paper-being-reviewed-llm/) 8. [**Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment arXiv:2411.03417**Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, et al.*2024 · 10 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/goldberg-2024-usefulness-llms-author-checklist-assistant/) 9. **[Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/vasu-2026-justice-judgment-unveiling-hidden-bias/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Sai Suresh Macharla Vasu, Ivaxi Sheth, Hui-Po Wang, et al.*2026 · 8 citations* 10. [**Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic Evaluation arXiv:2505.23824**Tianmai M. Zhang, Neil F. Abernethy*2025 · 7 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhang-2025-reviewing-scientific-papers-critical-problems/) 11. **[Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/dycke-2026-automatic-reviewers-fail-detect-faulty/) [Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/tacl/)**Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych*2026 · 5 citations* 12. **[NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wu-2026-novbench-evaluating-large-language-models/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Wenqing Wu, Yi Zhao, Yuzhuo Wang, et al.*2026 · 4 citations* 13. **[Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ruan-2026-author-loop-response-generation-evaluation/) [Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/)**Qian Ruan, Iryna Gurevych*2026 · 2 citations* 14. **[Decision-Making with Deliberation: Meta-reviewing as a Document-grounded Dialogue](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/purkayastha-2026-decision-making-deliberation-meta-reviewing/) [Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/eacl/)**Sukannya Purkayastha, Nils Dycke, Anne Lauscher, et al.*2026 · 2 citations* 15. **[Implicit Bias in Peer Review: Through the Lens of Language Abstraction](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhang-2026-implicit-bias-peer-review-through/) [Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/lrec/)**Xulang Zhang, Rui Mao, Erik Cambria*2026* 16. **[The Double Bind: Revisiting Preprinting and Peer Review Two Years After the Removal of the ACL Anonymity Period](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pranav-2026-double-bind-revisiting-preprinting-peer/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**A Pranav, Shane Storks, Anne Lauscher*2026* 12 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet. - [← back to](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kuznetsov-2024-natural-language-processing-peer/) — What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?