---
title: "BIG5-CHAT — paper by Li et al. (2025) — summary and ideas"
description: "The work offers a data-driven and more valid route to simulating personas in dialogue systems. 127 references, cited by 27 papers here."
authors: ["Wenkai Li", "Jiarui Liu", "Andy Liu", "Xuhui Zhou", "Mona T. Diab", "Maarten Sap"]
year: 2025
venue: "Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)"
source: "https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.999/"
doi: "10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.999"
licence: "CC BY 4.0 (ACL Anthology)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/li-2025-big5-chat-shaping-llm-personalities/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/li-2025-big5-chat-shaping-llm-personalities/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2025](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2025/page/2/) / BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data

# BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data

**Authors:** [Wenkai Li](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/wenkai-li/), [Jiarui Liu](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/jiarui-liu/), [Andy Liu](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/andy-liu/), [Xuhui Zhou](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/xuhui-zhou/), [Mona T. Diab](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/mona-diab/) and [Maarten Sap](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/maarten-sap/) · **Year:** 2025 · **Venue:** [Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/) ([ACL 2025](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/2025/)) · **Publisher:** [Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/publishers/association-for-computational-linguistics/) · **Licence:** [CC BY 4.0 (ACL Anthology)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.999/) · [PDF](https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.999.pdf) · [DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.999](https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.999) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W4412944944)

**Citations:** 15 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) · [27](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/li-2025-big5-chat-shaping-llm-personalities/cited-by/) in our library, of the 149,439 papers whose bibliographies we read

## Summary
Earlier attempts to give LLMs a Big Five personality mostly rely on prompts that describe typical behaviours. These descriptions are often borrowed from the same questionnaires later used for evaluation, which raises validity concerns. They also make little sense for a text-only model. The authors instead ground personality in how real people write. Their PSYCHSTEER pipeline trains trait-specific expert generators on PsychGenerator, a collection of Facebook posts labelled with Big Five scores. These experts steer a base model through DExperts decoding, while SODA supplies the social scenarios. The result is BIG5-CHAT, a corpus of 100,000 dialogues covering high and low levels of each trait. Models trained on it with SFT and DPO show stronger target traits on BFI and IPIP-NEO than instruction- or demonstration-prompted models. Their between-trait correlations are also closer to human data. On reasoning benchmarks, the induced traits shift performance in directions that echo findings from human psychology. The work offers a data-driven and more valid route to simulating personas in dialogue systems.

## Key points
- **BIG5-CHAT dataset:** 100,000 personality-conditioned dialogues, built by combining PsychGenerator (about 850K annotated Facebook posts) with SODA scenarios via DExperts. Data and code are released at github.com/jiarui-liu/Big5Chat.
- **Methods compared:** SFT and DPO versus prompting. Both training methods outperform prompting on the BFI and IPIP-NEO tests and show more realistic intra-trait correlations.
- **Reasoning benchmarks:** SocialIQA, GSM8K, MathQA, TruthfulQA, CommonsenseQA, PIQA, MMLU and GPQA.
- **Trait effects on reasoning:** Models trained toward higher conscientiousness and agreeableness, or lower extraversion and neuroticism, generally reason better.
- **Limitations:** The study steers only one trait at a time. PsychGenerator skews young (median age 22) and toward Facebook users, which raises fairness concerns. The authors also flag misuse risks such as impersonation.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

## Institutions

- [Carnegie Mellon University](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/carnegie-mellon-university/) — University, Pittsburgh, United States · 539 works · 179,533 citations

📚 Shelves (6): [🖥️ Computer Science](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/) · 16,667 works · [🤖 Artificial Intelligence](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/) · 16,194 works · [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 16,039 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 15,891 works · [💭 Psychology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/psychology/) · 1,552 works · [💭 Clinical Psychology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/psychology/clinical-psychology/) · 20 works

🧭 Topics (1): [🧠 Language models & pretraining](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/language-models/) · 3,320 works

## Cite

Cite as: Wenkai Li, Jiarui Liu, Andy Liu, Xuhui Zhou, Mona T. Diab and Maarten Sap. 2025. BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{li2025big5,
  title = {{BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data}},
  author = {Wenkai Li, Jiarui Liu, Andy Liu, Xuhui Zhou, Mona T. Diab and Maarten Sap},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.999},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.999}
}
```

- [← previous Towards Thinking-Optimal Scaling of Test-Time Compute for LLM Reasoning](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yang-2025-towards-thinking-optimal-scaling-test/)
- [next → Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhang-2025-improve-vision-language-model-chain/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2025](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2025/page/2/)

## References

127 references, 26 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Phillip L Ackerman and Eric D Heggestad. 1997. Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological bulletin, 121(2):219. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Phillip+L+Ackerman+and+Eric+D+Heggestad%2E+1997%2E+Intelligence%2C+personality%2C+and+interests%3A+evidence+for+overlapping+traits%2E+Psychological+bulletin%2C+121%282%29%3A219%2E)
2. Rangina Ahmad, Dominik Siemon, Ulrich Gnewuch, and Susanne Robra-Bissantz. 2022. Designing personality-adaptive conversational agents for mental health care. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(3):923–943. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rangina+Ahmad%2C+Dominik+Siemon%2C+Ulrich+Gnewuch%2C+and+Susanne+Robra%2DBissantz%2E+2022%2E+Designing+personality%2Dadaptive+conversational+agents+for+mental+health+care%2E+Information+Systems+Frontiers%2C+24%283%29%3A923%E2%80%939)
3. Aida Amini, Saadia Gabriel, Peter Lin, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Yejin Choi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2019. [Mathqa: Towards interpretable math word problem solving with operation-based formalisms](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/amini-2019-mathqa-interpretable-math-word-problem/). arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13319.
4. Anthropic. 2024. Claude’s character. Accessed: 2024-08-30. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Anthropic%2E+2024%2E+Claude%E2%80%99s+character%2E+Accessed%3A+2024%2D08%2D30%2E)
5. Michael C Ashton, Kibeom Lee, and Sampo V Paunonen. 2002. What is the central feature of extraversion? social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(1):245. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Michael+C+Ashton%2C+Kibeom+Lee%2C+and+Sampo+V+Paunonen%2E+2002%2E+What+is+the+central+feature+of+extraversion%3F+social+attention+versus+reward+sensitivity%2E+Journal+of+personality+and+social+psychology%2C+83%281%29%3A2)
6. Mark W Baldwin. 1992. Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological bulletin, 112(3):461. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Mark+W+Baldwin%2E+1992%2E+Relational+schemas+and+the+processing+of+social+information%2E+Psychological+bulletin%2C+112%283%29%3A461%2E)
7. Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross, and Sheila A Ross. 1961. Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3):575. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Albert+Bandura%2C+Dorothea+Ross%2C+and+Sheila+A+Ross%2E+1961%2E+Transmission+of+aggression+through+imitation+of+aggressive+models%2E+The+Journal+of+Abnormal+and+Social+Psychology%2C+63%283%29%3A575%2E)
8. Murray R Barrick and Michael K Mount. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1):1–26. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Murray+R+Barrick+and+Michael+K+Mount%2E+1991%2E+The+big+five+personality+dimensions+and+job+performance%3A+a+meta%2Danalysis%2E+Personnel+psychology%2C+44%281%29%3A1%E2%80%9326%2E)
9. Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Jianfeng Gao, Yejin Choi, et al. 2020. [Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bisk-2019-piqa-reasoning-about-physical-commonsense/). In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pages 7432–7439.
10. Gerhard Blickle. 1996. Personality traits, learning stratigies, and performance. European Journal of personality, 10(5):337–352. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gerhard+Blickle%2E+1996%2E+Personality+traits%2C+learning+stratigies%2C+and+performance%2E+European+Journal+of+personality%2C+10%285%29%3A337%E2%80%93352%2E)
11. Raymond B Cattell. 1957. Personality and motivation structure and measurement. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Raymond+B+Cattell%2E+1957%2E+Personality+and+motivation+structure+and+measurement%2E)
12. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic and Adrian Furnham. 2006. Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: A third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10(3):251–267. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tomas+Chamorro%2DPremuzic+and+Adrian+Furnham%2E+2006%2E+Intellectual+competence+and+the+intelligent+personality%3A+A+third+way+in+differential+psychology%2E+Review+of+General+Psychology%2C+10%283%29%3A251%E2%80%93267%2E)
13. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Adrian Furnham, and Konstantinos Petrides. 2006. Personality and intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences, 27(3):147–150. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tomas+Chamorro%2DPremuzic%2C+Adrian+Furnham%2C+and+Konstantinos+Petrides%2E+2006%2E+Personality+and+intelligence%2E+Journal+of+Individual+Differences%2C+27%283%29%3A147%E2%80%93150%2E)
14. Hongzhan Chen, Hehong Chen, Ming Yan, Wenshen Xu, Xing Gao, Weizhou Shen, Xiaojun Quan, Chenliang Li, Ji Zhang, Fei Huang, et al. 2024a. Socialbench: Sociality evaluation of role-playing conversational agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13679. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hongzhan+Chen%2C+Hehong+Chen%2C+Ming+Yan%2C+Wenshen+Xu%2C+Xing+Gao%2C+Weizhou+Shen%2C+Xiaojun+Quan%2C+Chenliang+Li%2C+Ji+Zhang%2C+Fei+Huang%2C+et+al%2E+2024a%2E+Socialbench%3A+Sociality+evaluation+of+role%2Dplaying+conversationa)
15. Nuo Chen, Y Wang, Yang Deng, and Jia Li. 2024b. The oscars of ai theater: A survey on role-playing with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11484. — [arXiv:2407.11484](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11484) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nuo+Chen%2C+Y+Wang%2C+Yang+Deng%2C+and+Jia+Li%2E+2024b%2E+The+oscars+of+ai+theater%3A+A+survey+on+role%2Dplaying+with+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2407%2E11484%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2407%2E11484%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fabs%2F240)
16. Nuo Chen, Yan Wang, Haiyun Jiang, Deng Cai, Yuhan Li, Ziyang Chen, Longyue Wang, and Jia Li. 2022. Large language models meet harry potter: A bilingual dataset for aligning dialogue agents with characters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.06869. — [arXiv:2211.06869](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06869) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nuo+Chen%2C+Yan+Wang%2C+Haiyun+Jiang%2C+Deng+Cai%2C+Yuhan+Li%2C+Ziyang+Chen%2C+Longyue+Wang%2C+and+Jia+Li%2E+2022%2E+Large+language+models+meet+harry+potter%3A+A+bilingual+dataset+for+aligning+dialogue+agents+with+charac)
17. Myra Cheng, Tiziano Piccardi, and Diyi Yang. 2023. Compost: Characterizing and evaluating caricature in llm simulations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11501. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Myra+Cheng%2C+Tiziano+Piccardi%2C+and+Diyi+Yang%2E+2023%2E+Compost%3A+Characterizing+and+evaluating+caricature+in+llm+simulations%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2310%2E11501%2E)
18. Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, et al. 2021. [Training verifiers to solve math word problems](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/cobbe-2021-training-verifiers-solve-math-word/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168.
19. Paul T Costa and Robert R McCrae. 2008. The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 2(2):179– 198. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Paul+T+Costa+and+Robert+R+McCrae%2E+2008%2E+The+revised+neo+personality+inventory+%28neo%2Dpi%2Dr%29%2E+The+SAGE+handbook+of+personality+theory+and+assessment%2C+2%282%29%3A179%E2%80%93+198%2E)
20. Paul T Costa Jr, James L Fozard, Robert R McCrae, and Raymond Bossé. 1976. Relations of age and personality dimensions to cognitive ability factors. Journal of gerontology, 31(6):663–669. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Paul+T+Costa+Jr%2C+James+L+Fozard%2C+Robert+R+McCrae%2C+and+Raymond+Boss%C3%A9%2E+1976%2E+Relations+of+age+and+personality+dimensions+to+cognitive+ability+factors%2E+Journal+of+gerontology%2C+31%286%29%3A663%E2%80%93669%2E)
21. Jiaxi Cui, Liuzhenghao Lv, Jing Wen, Jing Tang, YongHong Tian, and Li Yuan. 2023. Machine mindset: An mbti exploration of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.12999. — [arXiv:2312.12999](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12999) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jiaxi+Cui%2C+Liuzhenghao+Lv%2C+Jing+Wen%2C+Jing+Tang%2C+YongHong+Tian%2C+and+Li+Yuan%2E+2023%2E+Machine+mindset%3A+An+mbti+exploration+of+large+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2312%2E12999%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2312%2E12999%5D%28h)
22. Jia Deng, Tianyi Tang, Yanbin Yin, Wenhao Yang, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2024. Neuron-based personality trait induction in large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2410.12327. — [arXiv:2410.12327](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12327) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jia+Deng%2C+Tianyi+Tang%2C+Yanbin+Yin%2C+Wenhao+Yang%2C+Wayne+Xin+Zhao%2C+and+Ji%2DRong+Wen%2E+2024%2E+Neuron%2Dbased+personality+trait+induction+in+large+language+models%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A2410%2E12327%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2410%2E1232)
23. John M Digman. 1990. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual review of psychology, 41(1):417–440. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=John+M+Digman%2E+1990%2E+Personality+structure%3A+Emergence+of+the+five%2Dfactor+model%2E+Annual+review+of+psychology%2C+41%281%29%3A417%E2%80%93440%2E)
24. Wenhan Dong, Yuemeng Zhao, Zhen Sun, Yule Liu, Zifan Peng, Jingyi Zheng, Zongmin Zhang, Ziyi Zhang, Jun Wu, Ruiming Wang, et al. 2025. Humanizing llms: A survey of psychological measurements with tools, datasets, and human-agent applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00049. — [arXiv:2505.00049](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00049) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wenhan+Dong%2C+Yuemeng+Zhao%2C+Zhen+Sun%2C+Yule+Liu%2C+Zifan+Peng%2C+Jingyi+Zheng%2C+Zongmin+Zhang%2C+Ziyi+Zhang%2C+Jun+Wu%2C+Ruiming+Wang%2C+et+al%2E+2025%2E+Humanizing+llms%3A+A+survey+of+psychological+measurements+with+tool)
25. Florian E Dorner, Tom Sühr, Samira Samadi, and Augustin Kelava. 2023. Do personality tests generalize to large language models? arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05297. — [arXiv:2311.05297](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05297) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Florian+E+Dorner%2C+Tom+S%C3%BChr%2C+Samira+Samadi%2C+and+Augustin+Kelava%2E+2023%2E+Do+personality+tests+generalize+to+large+language+models%3F+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2311%2E05297%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2311%2E05297%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2F)
26. Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, Anirudh Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Aobo Yang, Archi Mitra, Archie Sravankumar, Artem Korenev, Arthur Hinsvark, Arun Rao, Aston Zhang, Aurelien Rodriguez,… — [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/grattafiori-2024-llama-3-herd-models/)
27. L Edwards. 2022. The eu ai act: a summary of its significance and scope, ada lovelace institute. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=L+Edwards%2E+2022%2E+The+eu+ai+act%3A+a+summary+of+its+significance+and+scope%2C+ada+lovelace+institute%2E)
28. Jon Elster. 2015. Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jon+Elster%2E+2015%2E+Explaining+social+behavior%3A+More+nuts+and+bolts+for+the+social+sciences%2E+Cambridge+University+Press%2E)
29. HJ Eysenck. 1997. Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised (epq-r) and short scale (epq-rs). Madrid: TEA Ediciones. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=HJ+Eysenck%2E+1997%2E+Eysenck+personality+questionnaire%2Drevised+%28epq%2Dr%29+and+short+scale+%28epq%2Drs%29%2E+Madrid%3A+TEA+Ediciones%2E)
30. Michael W Eysenck. 2013. Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Psychology Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Michael+W+Eysenck%2E+2013%2E+Anxiety%3A+The+cognitive+perspective%2E+Psychology+Press%2E)
31. Iustin Floroiu. 2024. Big5personalityessays: Introducing a novel synthetic generated dataset consisting of short state-of-consciousness essays annotated based on the five factor model of personality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17586. — [arXiv:2407.17586](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17586) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Iustin+Floroiu%2E+2024%2E+Big5personalityessays%3A+Introducing+a+novel+synthetic+generated+dataset+consisting+of+short+state%2Dof%2Dconsciousness+essays+annotated+based+on+the+five+factor+model+of+personality%2E+)
32. Ivar Frisch and Mario Giulianelli. 2024. Llm agents in interaction: Measuring personality consistency and linguistic alignment in interacting populations of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02896. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ivar+Frisch+and+Mario+Giulianelli%2E+2024%2E+Llm+agents+in+interaction%3A+Measuring+personality+consistency+and+linguistic+alignment+in+interacting+populations+of+large+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv)
33. Adrian Furnham. 1996. The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the myers-briggs type indicator (mbti) and neo-pi five factor model of personality. Personality and individual differences, 21(2):303– 307. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Adrian+Furnham%2E+1996%2E+The+big+five+versus+the+big+four%3A+the+relationship+between+the+myers%2Dbriggs+type+indicator+%28mbti%29+and+neo%2Dpi+five+factor+model+of+personality%2E+Personality+and+individual+differen)
34. Chen Gao, Xiaochong Lan, Nian Li, Yuan Yuan, Jingtao Ding, Zhilun Zhou, Fengli Xu, and Yong Li. 2024a. Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: A survey and perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1):1–24. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Chen+Gao%2C+Xiaochong+Lan%2C+Nian+Li%2C+Yuan+Yuan%2C+Jingtao+Ding%2C+Zhilun+Zhou%2C+Fengli+Xu%2C+and+Yong+Li%2E+2024a%2E+Large+language+models+empowered+agent%2Dbased+modeling+and+simulation%3A+A+survey+and+perspectives%2E+H)
35. Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Baber Abbasi, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Anthony DiPofi, Charles Foster, Laurence Golding, Jeffrey Hsu, Alain Le Noac’h, Haonan Li, Kyle McDonell, Niklas Muennighoff, Chris Ociepa, Jason Phang, Laria Reynolds, Hailey Schoelkopf, Aviya Skowron, Lintang Sutawika, Eric Tang, Ani… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Leo+Gao%2C+Jonathan+Tow%2C+Baber+Abbasi%2C+Stella+Biderman%2C+Sid+Black%2C+Anthony+DiPofi%2C+Charles+Foster%2C+Laurence+Golding%2C+Jeffrey+Hsu%2C+Alain+Le+Noac%E2%80%99h%2C+Haonan+Li%2C+Kyle+McDonell%2C+Niklas+Muennighoff%2C+Chris+Oci)
36. Lewis R Goldberg. 1992. The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4(1):26. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lewis+R+Goldberg%2E+1992%2E+The+development+of+markers+for+the+big%2Dfive+factor+structure%2E+Psychological+assessment%2C+4%281%29%3A26%2E)
37. Eileen K Graham and Margie E Lachman. 2012. Personality stability is associated with better cognitive performance in adulthood: are the stable more able? [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Eileen+K+Graham+and+Margie+E+Lachman%2E+2012%2E+Personality+stability+is+associated+with+better+cognitive+performance+in+adulthood%3A+are+the+stable+more+able%3F)
38. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(5):545–554. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Journals+of+Gerontology+Series+B%3A+Psychological+Sciences+and+Social+Sciences%2C+67%285%29%3A545%E2%80%93554%2E)
39. WG Graziano. 1997. Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=WG+Graziano%2E+1997%2E+Agreeableness%3A+A+dimension+of+personality%2E)
40. Daya Guo, Qihao Zhu, Dejian Yang, Zhenda Xie, Kai Dong, Wentao Zhang, Guanting Chen, Xiao Bi, Yu Wu, YK Li, et al. 2024. Deepseek-coder: When the large language model meets programming– the rise of code intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14196. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Daya+Guo%2C+Qihao+Zhu%2C+Dejian+Yang%2C+Zhenda+Xie%2C+Kai+Dong%2C+Wentao+Zhang%2C+Guanting+Chen%2C+Xiao+Bi%2C+Yu+Wu%2C+YK+Li%2C+et+al%2E+2024%2E+Deepseek%2Dcoder%3A+When+the+large+language+model+meets+programming%E2%80%93+the+rise+of+co)
41. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020. [Measuring massive multitask language understanding](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hendrycks-2020-measuring-massive-multitask-language-understanding/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300.
42. Dirk Hovy and Shannon L Spruit. 2016. [The social impact of natural language processing](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hovy-2016-social-impact-natural-language-processing/). In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 591–598.
43. Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Cynthia Breazeal, Deb Roy, and Jad Kabbara. 2024b. Personallm: Investigating the ability of large language models to express personality traits. Preprint, arXiv:2305.02547. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hang+Jiang%2C+Xiajie+Zhang%2C+Xubo+Cao%2C+Cynthia+Breazeal%2C+Deb+Roy%2C+and+Jad+Kabbara%2E+2024b%2E+Personallm%3A+Investigating+the+ability+of+large+language+models+to+express+personality+traits%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A230)
44. Oliver P John, Laura P Naumann, and Christopher J Soto. 2008. Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 3(2):114–158. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Oliver+P+John%2C+Laura+P+Naumann%2C+and+Christopher+J+Soto%2E+2008%2E+Paradigm+shift+to+the+integrative+big+five+trait+taxonomy%2E+Handbook+of+personality%3A+Theory+and+research%2C+3%282%29%3A114%E2%80%93158%2E)
45. Oliver P John, Sanjay Srivastava, et al. 1999. The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: theory and research. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Oliver+P+John%2C+Sanjay+Srivastava%2C+et+al%2E+1999%2E+The+big%2Dfive+trait+taxonomy%3A+History%2C+measurement%2C+and+theoretical+perspectives%2E+Handbook+of+personality%3A+theory+and+research%2E)
46. John A Johnson. 2014. Measuring thirty facets of the five factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the ipip-neo-120. Journal of research in personality, 51:78–89. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=John+A+Johnson%2E+2014%2E+Measuring+thirty+facets+of+the+five+factor+model+with+a+120%2Ditem+public+domain+inventory%3A+Development+of+the+ipip%2Dneo%2D120%2E+Journal+of+research+in+personality%2C+51%3A78%E2%80%9389%2E)
47. Peter Karl Jonason and Gregory D. Webster. 2010. The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological assessment, 22 2:420–32. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Peter+Karl+Jonason+and+Gregory+D%2E+Webster%2E+2010%2E+The+dirty+dozen%3A+a+concise+measure+of+the+dark+triad%2E+Psychological+assessment%2C+22+2%3A420%E2%80%9332%2E)
48. Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. [Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hu-2021-lora-low-rank-adaptation-large/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685.
49. Junko Kanero, Cansu Oranç, Sümeyye Koşkulu, G Tar-can Kumkale, Tilbe Göksun, and Aylin C Küntay. 2022. Are tutor robots for everyone? the influence of attitudes, anxiety, and personality on robot-led language learning. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2):297–312. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Junko+Kanero%2C+Cansu+Oran%C3%A7%2C+S%C3%BCmeyye+Kos%CC%A7kulu%2C+G+Tar%2Dcan+Kumkale%2C+Tilbe+G%C3%B6ksun%2C+and+Aylin+C+K%C3%BCntay%2E+2022%2E+Are+tutor+robots+for+everyone%3F+the+influence+of+attitudes%2C+anxiety%2C+and+personality+on+robot%2Dled)
50. Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2022. [LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hu-2021-lora-low-rank-adaptation-large/). In International Conference on Learning Representations.
51. Saketh Reddy Karra, Son The Nguyen, and Theja Tulabandhula. 2022. Estimating the personality of white-box language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12000. — [arXiv:2204.12000](https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12000) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Saketh+Reddy+Karra%2C+Son+The+Nguyen%2C+and+Theja+Tulabandhula%2E+2022%2E+Estimating+the+personality+of+white%2Dbox+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2204%2E12000%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2204%2E12000%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fabs%2F2)
52. Jen-tse Huang, Wenxuan Wang, Man Ho Lam, Eric John Li, Wenxiang Jiao, and Michael R. Lyu. 2023. Revisiting the reliability of psychological scales on large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19926. — [arXiv:2305.19926](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19926) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jen%2Dtse+Huang%2C+Wenxuan+Wang%2C+Man+Ho+Lam%2C+Eric+John+Li%2C+Wenxiang+Jiao%2C+and+Michael+R%2E+Lyu%2E+2023%2E+Revisiting+the+reliability+of+psychological+scales+on+large+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2305%2E1)
53. Hyunwoo Kim, Jack Hessel, Liwei Jiang, Peter West, Ximing Lu, Youngjae Yu, Pei Zhou, Ronan Le Bras, Malihe Alikhani, Gunhee Kim, Maarten Sap, and Yejin Choi. 2023a. [Soda: Million-scale dialogue distillation with social commonsense contextualization](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kim-2023-soda-million-scale-dialogue-distillation/). Preprint, arXiv:2212.10465.
54. Jen-tse Huang, Wenxuan Wang, Eric John Li, Man Ho Lam, Shujie Ren, Youliang Yuan, Wenxiang Jiao, Zhaopeng Tu, and Michael R. Lyu. 2024. On the humanity of conversational ai: Evaluating the psychological portrayal of llms. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representat… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jen%2Dtse+Huang%2C+Wenxuan+Wang%2C+Eric+John+Li%2C+Man+Ho+Lam%2C+Shujie+Ren%2C+Youliang+Yuan%2C+Wenxiang+Jiao%2C+Zhaopeng+Tu%2C+and+Michael+R%2E+Lyu%2E+2024%2E+On+the+humanity+of+conversational+ai%3A+Evaluating+the+psychologic)
55. Guangyuan Jiang, Manjie Xu, Song-Chun Zhu, Wenjuan Han, Chi Zhang, and Yixin Zhu. 2023a. Evaluating and inducing personality in pre-trained language models. In NeurIPS. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Guangyuan+Jiang%2C+Manjie+Xu%2C+Song%2DChun+Zhu%2C+Wenjuan+Han%2C+Chi+Zhang%2C+and+Yixin+Zhu%2E+2023a%2E+Evaluating+and+inducing+personality+in+pre%2Dtrained+language+models%2E+In+NeurIPS%2E)
56. Guangyuan Jiang, Manjie Xu, Song-Chun Zhu, Wenjuan Han, Chi Zhang, and Yixin Zhu. 2024a. Evaluating and inducing personality in pre-trained language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Guangyuan+Jiang%2C+Manjie+Xu%2C+Song%2DChun+Zhu%2C+Wenjuan+Han%2C+Chi+Zhang%2C+and+Yixin+Zhu%2E+2024a%2E+Evaluating+and+inducing+personality+in+pre%2Dtrained+language+models%2E+Advances+in+Neural+Information+Processing+S)
57. Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Cynthia Breazeal, Deb Roy, and Jad Kabbara. 2023b. Personallm: Investigating the ability of large language models to express personality traits. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02547. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hang+Jiang%2C+Xiajie+Zhang%2C+Xubo+Cao%2C+Cynthia+Breazeal%2C+Deb+Roy%2C+and+Jad+Kabbara%2E+2023b%2E+Personallm%3A+Investigating+the+ability+of+large+language+models+to+express+personality+traits%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXi)
58. Hyunwoo Kim, Jack Hessel, Liwei Jiang, Peter West, Ximing Lu, Youngjae Yu, Pei Zhou, Ronan Le Bras, Malihe Alikhani, Gunhee Kim, et al. 2022. [Soda: Million-scale dialogue distillation with social commonsense contextualization](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kim-2023-soda-million-scale-dialogue-distillation/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10465.
59. Hyunwoo Kim, Melanie Sclar, Xuhui Zhou, Ronan Bras, Gunhee Kim, Yejin Choi, and Maarten Sap. 2023b. FANToM: A benchmark for stress-testing machine theory of mind in interactions. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 14397–14413, Singapore.… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hyunwoo+Kim%2C+Melanie+Sclar%2C+Xuhui+Zhou%2C+Ronan+Bras%2C+Gunhee+Kim%2C+Yejin+Choi%2C+and+Maarten+Sap%2E+2023b%2E+FANToM%3A+A+benchmark+for+stress%2Dtesting+machine+theory+of+mind+in+interactions%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the)
60. Hadas Kotek, Rikker Dockum, and David Sun. 2023. Gender bias and stereotypes in large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM collective intelligence conference, pages 12–24. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hadas+Kotek%2C+Rikker+Dockum%2C+and+David+Sun%2E+2023%2E+Gender+bias+and+stereotypes+in+large+language+models%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+ACM+collective+intelligence+conference%2C+pages+12%E2%80%9324%2E)
61. Nikola Kovačević, Christian Holz, Markus Gross, and Rafael Wampfler. 2024. The personality dimensions gpt-3 expresses during human-chatbot interactions. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nikola+Kovac%CC%8Cevic%CC%81%2C+Christian+Holz%2C+Markus+Gross%2C+and+Rafael+Wampfler%2E+2024%2E+The+personality+dimensions+gpt%2D3+expresses+during+human%2Dchatbot+interactions%2E)
62. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 8(2). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Proc%2E+ACM+Interact%2E+Mob%2E+Wearable+Ubiquitous+Technol%2E%2C+8%282%29%2E)
63. Seongyun Lee, Sue Hyun Park, Seungone Kim, and Minjoon Seo. 2024. Aligning to thousands of preferences via system message generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17977. — [arXiv:2405.17977](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17977) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Seongyun+Lee%2C+Sue+Hyun+Park%2C+Seungone+Kim%2C+and+Minjoon+Seo%2E+2024%2E+Aligning+to+thousands+of+preferences+via+system+message+generalization%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2405%2E17977%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2405%2E17977%5D%28https%3A%2F%2F)
64. Jiale Li, Jiayang Li, Jiahao Chen, Yifan Li, Shijie Wang, Hugo Zhou, Minjun Ye, and Yunsheng Su. 2024. Evolving agents: Interactive simulation of dynamic and diverse human personalities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02718. — [arXiv:2404.02718](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02718) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jiale+Li%2C+Jiayang+Li%2C+Jiahao+Chen%2C+Yifan+Li%2C+Shijie+Wang%2C+Hugo+Zhou%2C+Minjun+Ye%2C+and+Yunsheng+Su%2E+2024%2E+Evolving+agents%3A+Interactive+simulation+of+dynamic+and+diverse+human+personalities%2E+arXiv+preprin)
65. Xingxuan Li, Yutong Li, Shafiq Joty, Linlin Liu, Fei Huang, Lin Qiu, and Lidong Bing. 2022. Does gpt-3 demonstrate psychopathy? evaluating large language models from a psychological perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10529. — [arXiv:2212.10529](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10529) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Xingxuan+Li%2C+Yutong+Li%2C+Shafiq+Joty%2C+Linlin+Liu%2C+Fei+Huang%2C+Lin+Qiu%2C+and+Lidong+Bing%2E+2022%2E+Does+gpt%2D3+demonstrate+psychopathy%3F+evaluating+large+language+models+from+a+psychological+perspective%2E+arXiv)
66. Q. Vera Liao and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. 2024. AI Transparency in the Age of LLMs: A Human-Centered Research Roadmap. Harvard Data Science Review, (Special Issue 5). Https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/aelql9qy. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Q%2E+Vera+Liao+and+Jennifer+Wortman+Vaughan%2E+2024%2E+AI+Transparency+in+the+Age+of+LLMs%3A+A+Human%2DCentered+Research+Roadmap%2E+Harvard+Data+Science+Review%2C+%28Special+Issue+5%29%2E+Https%3A%2F%2Fhdsr%2Emitpress%2Emit%2Eedu%2Fpu)
67. Filip Lievens, Charlie L Reeve, and Eric D Heggestad. 2007. An examination of psychometric bias due to retesting on cognitive ability tests in selection settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6):1672. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Filip+Lievens%2C+Charlie+L+Reeve%2C+and+Eric+D+Heggestad%2E+2007%2E+An+examination+of+psychometric+bias+due+to+retesting+on+cognitive+ability+tests+in+selection+settings%2E+Journal+of+Applied+Psychology%2C+92%286%29%3A)
68. Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2021. [Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lin-2022-truthfulqa-measuring-how-models-mimic/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958.
69. Alisa Liu, Maarten Sap, Ximing Lu, Swabha Swayamdipta, Chandra Bhagavatula, Noah A Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2021. [Dexperts: Decoding-time controlled text generation with experts and anti-experts](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/liu-2021-dexperts-decoding-time-controlled-text/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03023.
70. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. [Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/liu-2019-roberta-robustly-optimized-bert-pretraining/). ArXiv, abs/1907.11692.
71. Yao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel, and Pontus Stenetorp. 2021. [Fantastically ordered prompts and where to find them: Overcoming few-shot prompt order sensitivity](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lu-2022-fantastically-ordered-prompts-where-find/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08786.
72. François Mairesse, Marilyn A Walker, Matthias R Mehl, and Roger K Moore. 2007. Using linguistic cues for the [automatic recognition of personality in conversation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mairesse-2006-automatic-recognition-personality-conversation/) and text. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 30:457–500.
73. Shengyu Mao, Ningyu Zhang, Xiaohan Wang, Mengru Wang, Yunzhi Yao, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, and Huajun Chen. 2023. Editing personality for llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02168. — [arXiv:2310.02168](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02168) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shengyu+Mao%2C+Ningyu+Zhang%2C+Xiaohan+Wang%2C+Mengru+Wang%2C+Yunzhi+Yao%2C+Yong+Jiang%2C+Pengjun+Xie%2C+Fei+Huang%2C+and+Huajun+Chen%2E+2023%2E+Editing+personality+for+llms%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2310%2E02168%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A231)
74. Gerald Matthews and Kirby Gilliland. 1999. The personality theories of hj eysenck and ja gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual differences, 26(4):583–626. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gerald+Matthews+and+Kirby+Gilliland%2E+1999%2E+The+personality+theories+of+hj+eysenck+and+ja+gray%3A+A+comparative+review%2E+Personality+and+Individual+differences%2C+26%284%29%3A583%E2%80%93626%2E)
75. Robert R McCrae. 1987. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6):1258. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Robert+R+McCrae%2E+1987%2E+Creativity%2C+divergent+thinking%2C+and+openness+to+experience%2E+Journal+of+personality+and+social+psychology%2C+52%286%29%3A1258%2E)
76. Robert R McCrae and Paul T Costa. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1):81. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Robert+R+McCrae+and+Paul+T+Costa%2E+1987%2E+Validation+of+the+five%2Dfactor+model+of+personality+across+instruments+and+observers%2E+Journal+of+personality+and+social+psychology%2C+52%281%29%3A81%2E)
77. Robert R McCrae and Paul T Costa Jr. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American psychologist, 52(5):509. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Robert+R+McCrae+and+Paul+T+Costa+Jr%2E+1997%2E+Personality+trait+structure+as+a+human+universal%2E+American+psychologist%2C+52%285%29%3A509%2E)
78. Robert R McCrae and Oliver P John. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of personality, 60(2):175–215. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Robert+R+McCrae+and+Oliver+P+John%2E+1992%2E+An+introduction+to+the+five%2Dfactor+model+and+its+applications%2E+Journal+of+personality%2C+60%282%29%3A175%E2%80%93215%2E)
79. Matthias R Mehl, Samuel D Gosling, and James W Pennebaker. 2006. Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(5):862. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Matthias+R+Mehl%2C+Samuel+D+Gosling%2C+and+James+W+Pennebaker%2E+2006%2E+Personality+in+its+natural+habitat%3A+manifestations+and+implicit+folk+theories+of+personality+in+daily+life%2E+Journal+of+personality+and+)
80. Moran Mizrahi, Guy Kaplan, Dan Malkin, Rotem Dror, Dafna Shahaf, and Gabriel Stanovsky. 2024. State of what art? a call for multi-prompt llm evaluation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12:933–949. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Moran+Mizrahi%2C+Guy+Kaplan%2C+Dan+Malkin%2C+Rotem+Dror%2C+Dafna+Shahaf%2C+and+Gabriel+Stanovsky%2E+2024%2E+State+of+what+art%3F+a+call+for+multi%2Dprompt+llm+evaluation%2E+Transactions+of+the+Association+for+Computation)
81. Joanna Moutafi, Adrian Furnham, and John Crump. 2003. Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: A study using the neo personality inventory and the myers–briggs type indicator. European Journal of Personality, 17(1):79–94. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Joanna+Moutafi%2C+Adrian+Furnham%2C+and+John+Crump%2E+2003%2E+Demographic+and+personality+predictors+of+intelligence%3A+A+study+using+the+neo+personality+inventory+and+the+myers%E2%80%93briggs+type+indicator%2E+European+)
82. Alberto Muñoz-Ortiz, Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez, and David Vilares. 2023. Contrasting linguistic patterns in human and llm-generated text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09067. — [arXiv:2308.09067](https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09067) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Alberto+Mu%C3%B1oz%2DOrtiz%2C+Carlos+G%C3%B3mez%2DRodr%C3%ADguez%2C+and+David+Vilares%2E+2023%2E+Contrasting+linguistic+patterns+in+human+and+llm%2Dgenerated+text%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2308%2E09067%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2308%2E09067%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farx)
83. Isabel Briggs Myers et al. 1962. The myers-briggs type indicator, volume 34. Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Isabel+Briggs+Myers+et+al%2E+1962%2E+The+myers%2Dbriggs+type+indicator%2C+volume+34%2E+Consulting+Psychologists+Press+Palo+Alto%2C+CA%2E)
84. Carlos Olea, Holly Tucker, Jessica Phelan, Cameron Pattison, Shen Zhang, Maxwell Lieb, and J White. 2024. Evaluating persona prompting for question answering tasks. In Proceedings of th e 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and soft computing, Sydney, Australia. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Carlos+Olea%2C+Holly+Tucker%2C+Jessica+Phelan%2C+Cameron+Pattison%2C+Shen+Zhang%2C+Maxwell+Lieb%2C+and+J+White%2E+2024%2E+Evaluating+persona+prompting+for+question+answering+tasks%2E+In+Proceedings+of+th+e+10th+interna)
85. OpenAI. 2024. Hello, gpt-4 turbo. Accessed: 2024-10-01. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=OpenAI%2E+2024%2E+Hello%2C+gpt%2D4+turbo%2E+Accessed%3A+2024%2D10%2D01%2E)
86. Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. 2022. [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ouyang-2022-training-language-models-follow-instructions/). Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27730–27744.
87. Keyu Pan and Yawen Zeng. 2023. [Do llms possess a personality? making the mbti test an amazing evaluation for large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pan-2023-llms-possess-personality-making-mbti/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16180.
88. Joon Sung Park, Joseph C. O’Brien, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2023. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Joon+Sung+Park%2C+Joseph+C%2E+O%E2%80%99Brien%2C+Carrie+J%2E+Cai%2C+Meredith+Ringel+Morris%2C+Percy+Liang%2C+and+Michael+S%2E+Bernstein%2E+2023%2E+Generative+agents%3A+Interactive+simulacra+of+human+behavior%2E+Proceedings+of+the+36)
89. Delroy L Paulhus and Kevin M Williams. 2002. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of research in personality, 36(6):556–563. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Delroy+L+Paulhus+and+Kevin+M+Williams%2E+2002%2E+The+dark+triad+of+personality%3A+Narcissism%2C+machiavellianism%2C+and+psychopathy%2E+Journal+of+research+in+personality%2C+36%286%29%3A556%E2%80%93563%2E)
90. James W Pennebaker and Laura A King. 1999. Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(6):1296. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=James+W+Pennebaker+and+Laura+A+King%2E+1999%2E+Linguistic+styles%3A+language+use+as+an+individual+difference%2E+Journal+of+personality+and+social+psychology%2C+77%286%29%3A1296%2E)
91. Nikolay B Petrov, Gregory Serapio-García, and Jason Rentfrow. 2024. Limited ability of llms to simulate human psychological behaviours: a psychometric analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07248. — [arXiv:2405.07248](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07248) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nikolay+B+Petrov%2C+Gregory+Serapio%2DGarc%C3%ADa%2C+and+Jason+Rentfrow%2E+2024%2E+Limited+ability+of+llms+to+simulate+human+psychological+behaviours%3A+a+psychometric+analysis%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2405%2E07248%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarX)
92. David J Pittenger. 1993. The utility of the myers-briggs type indicator. Review of educational research, 63(4):467–488. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=David+J+Pittenger%2E+1993%2E+The+utility+of+the+myers%2Dbriggs+type+indicator%2E+Review+of+educational+research%2C+63%284%29%3A467%E2%80%93488%2E)
93. Arthur E Poropat. 2009. A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological bulletin, 135(2):322. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Arthur+E+Poropat%2E+2009%2E+A+meta%2Danalysis+of+the+five%2Dfactor+model+of+personality+and+academic+performance%2E+Psychological+bulletin%2C+135%282%29%3A322%2E)
94. Alisha Pradhan and Amanda Lazar. 2021. Hey google, do you have a personality? designing personality and personas for conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, pages 1–4. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Alisha+Pradhan+and+Amanda+Lazar%2E+2021%2E+Hey+google%2C+do+you+have+a+personality%3F+designing+personality+and+personas+for+conversational+agents%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+3rd+Conference+on+Conversational+User+)
95. Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. 2024. [Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/rafailov-2023-direct-preference-optimization-language-model/). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
96. David Rein, Betty Li Hou, Asa Cooper Stickland, Jackson Petty, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Julien Dirani, Julian Michael, and Samuel R Bowman. 2023. [Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/rein-2023-gpqa-graduate-level-google-proof/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12022.
97. Brent W Roberts, Carl Lejuez, Robert F Krueger, Jessica M Richards, and Patrick L Hill. 2014. What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed? Developmental psychology, 50(5):1315. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Brent+W+Roberts%2C+Carl+Lejuez%2C+Robert+F+Krueger%2C+Jessica+M+Richards%2C+and+Patrick+L+Hill%2E+2014%2E+What+is+conscientiousness+and+how+can+it+be+assessed%3F+Developmental+psychology%2C+50%285%29%3A1315%2E)
98. Michael D Robinson and Maya Tamir. 2005. Neuroticism as mental noise: a relation between neuroticism and reaction time standard deviations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(1):107. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Michael+D+Robinson+and+Maya+Tamir%2E+2005%2E+Neuroticism+as+mental+noise%3A+a+relation+between+neuroticism+and+reaction+time+standard+deviations%2E+Journal+of+personality+and+social+psychology%2C+89%281%29%3A107%2E)
99. Maarten Sap, Hannah Rashkin, Derek Chen, Ronan LeBras, and Yejin Choi. 2019. [Socialiqa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/sap-2019-socialiqa-commonsense-reasoning-about-social/). arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09728.
100. Toru Sato. 2005. The eysenck personality questionnaire brief version: Factor structure and reliability. The Journal of psychology, 139(6):545–552. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Toru+Sato%2E+2005%2E+The+eysenck+personality+questionnaire+brief+version%3A+Factor+structure+and+reliability%2E+The+Journal+of+psychology%2C+139%286%29%3A545%E2%80%93552%2E)
101. K Warner Schaie, Sherry L Willis, and Grace IL Caskie. 2004. The seattle longitudinal study: Relationship between personality and cognition. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 11(2-3):304–324. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=K+Warner+Schaie%2C+Sherry+L+Willis%2C+and+Grace+IL+Caskie%2E+2004%2E+The+seattle+longitudinal+study%3A+Relationship+between+personality+and+cognition%2E+Aging+Neuropsychology+and+Cognition%2C+11%282%2D3%29%3A304%E2%80%93324%2E)
102. Melanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, and Alane Suhr. 2023. Quantifying language models’ sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: How i learned to start worrying about prompt formatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11324. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Melanie+Sclar%2C+Yejin+Choi%2C+Yulia+Tsvetkov%2C+and+Alane+Suhr%2E+2023%2E+Quantifying+language+models%E2%80%99+sensitivity+to+spurious+features+in+prompt+design+or%3A+How+i+learned+to+start+worrying+about+prompt+formatt)
103. SM Seals and Valerie L Shalin. 2023. Long-form analogies generated by chatgpt lack human-like psycholinguistic properties. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04537. — [arXiv:2306.04537](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04537) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SM+Seals+and+Valerie+L+Shalin%2E+2023%2E+Long%2Dform+analogies+generated+by+chatgpt+lack+human%2Dlike+psycholinguistic+properties%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2306%2E04537%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2306%2E04537%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fabs%2F2)
104. Greg Serapio-García, Mustafa Safdari, Clément Crepy, Luning Sun, Stephen Fitz, Peter Romero, Marwa Abdulhai, Aleksandra Faust, and Maja Matarić. 2023. [Personality traits in large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/serapio-garcia-2023-personality-traits-large-language-models/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00184.
105. Bangzhao Shu, Lechen Zhang, Minje Choi, Lavinia Dunagan, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee, Dallas Card, and David Jurgens. 2024. You don’t need a personality test to know these models are unreliable: Assessing the reliability of large language models on psychometric instruments. In Proceedings of t… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bangzhao+Shu%2C+Lechen+Zhang%2C+Minje+Choi%2C+Lavinia+Dunagan%2C+Lajanugen+Logeswaran%2C+Moontae+Lee%2C+Dallas+Card%2C+and+David+Jurgens%2E+2024%2E+You+don%E2%80%99t+need+a+personality+test+to+know+these+models+are+unreliable%3A)
106. Stephen Soldz and George E Vaillant. 1999. The big five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of research in personality, 33(2):208–232. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Stephen+Soldz+and+George+E+Vaillant%2E+1999%2E+The+big+five+personality+traits+and+the+life+course%3A+A+45%2Dyear+longitudinal+study%2E+Journal+of+research+in+personality%2C+33%282%29%3A208%E2%80%93232%2E)
107. Nikita Soni, H Andrew Schwartz, João Sedoc, and Niranjan Balasubramanian. 2023. Large human language models: A need and the challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07751. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nikita+Soni%2C+H+Andrew+Schwartz%2C+Jo%C3%A3o+Sedoc%2C+and+Niranjan+Balasubramanian%2E+2023%2E+Large+human+language+models%3A+A+need+and+the+challenges%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2312%2E07751%2E)
108. Christopher J Soto, Oliver P John, Samuel D Gosling, and Jeff Potter. 2011. Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of personality and social psychology, 100(2):330. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Christopher+J+Soto%2C+Oliver+P+John%2C+Samuel+D+Gosling%2C+and+Jeff+Potter%2E+2011%2E+Age+differences+in+personality+traits+from+10+to+65%3A+Big+five+domains+and+facets+in+a+large+cross%2Dsectional+sample%2E+Journal+)
109. Lee A Spitzley, Xinran Wang, Xunyu Chen, Judee K Burgoon, Norah E Dunbar, and Saiying Ge. 2022. Linguistic measures of personality in group discussions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:887616. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lee+A+Spitzley%2C+Xinran+Wang%2C+Xunyu+Chen%2C+Judee+K+Burgoon%2C+Norah+E+Dunbar%2C+and+Saiying+Ge%2E+2022%2E+Linguistic+measures+of+personality+in+group+discussions%2E+Frontiers+in+Psychology%2C+13%3A887616%2E)
110. Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul F Christiano. 2020. Learning to summarize with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:3008– 3021. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nisan+Stiennon%2C+Long+Ouyang%2C+Jeffrey+Wu%2C+Daniel+Ziegler%2C+Ryan+Lowe%2C+Chelsea+Voss%2C+Alec+Radford%2C+Dario+Amodei%2C+and+Paul+F+Christiano%2E+2020%2E+Learning+to+summarize+with+human+feedback%2E+Advances+in+Neural)
111. Jose Sá, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, Jacopo Amidei, and Rubén Nieto. 2024. How well do simulated populations with gpt-4 align with real ones in clinical trials? the case of the epqr-a personality test. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jose+S%C3%A1%2C+Andreas+Kaltenbrunner%2C+Jacopo+Amidei%2C+and+Rub%C3%A9n+Nieto%2E+2024%2E+How+well+do+simulated+populations+with+gpt%2D4+align+with+real+ones+in+clinical+trials%3F+the+case+of+the+epqr%2Da+personality+test%2E)
112. Haoran Ye, Jing Jin, Yuhang Xie, Xin Zhang, and Guojie Song. 2025. Large language model psychometrics: A systematic review of evaluation, validation, and enhancement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08245. — [arXiv:2505.08245](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08245) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Haoran+Ye%2C+Jing+Jin%2C+Yuhang+Xie%2C+Xin+Zhang%2C+and+Guojie+Song%2E+2025%2E+Large+language+model+psychometrics%3A+A+systematic+review+of+evaluation%2C+validation%2C+and+enhancement%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2505%2E08245%2E+)
113. Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. 2019. [CommonsenseQA: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/talmor-2019-commonsenseqa-question-answering-challenge-targeting/). In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies,…
114. Moshe Zeidner. 2005. Test anxiety: The state of the art. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Moshe+Zeidner%2E+2005%2E+Test+anxiety%3A+The+state+of+the+art%2E)
115. Fiona Anting Tan, Gerard Christopher Yeo, Fanyou Wu, Weijie Xu, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Kokil Jaidka, Yang Liu, and See-Kiong Ng. 2024. [Phantom: Personality has an effect on theory-of-mind reasoning in large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tan-2024-phantom-persona-based-prompting-has/). arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02246.
116. Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B Hashimoto. 2023. Stanford alpaca: An instruction-following llama model. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rohan+Taori%2C+Ishaan+Gulrajani%2C+Tianyi+Zhang%2C+Yann+Dubois%2C+Xuechen+Li%2C+Carlos+Guestrin%2C+Percy+Liang%2C+and+Tatsunori+B+Hashimoto%2E+2023%2E+Stanford+alpaca%3A+An+instruction%2Dfollowing+llama+model%2E)
117. Quan Tu, Shilong Fan, Zihang Tian, Tianhao Shen, Shuo Shang, Xin Gao, and Rui Yan. 2024. [CharacterEval: A Chinese benchmark for role-playing conversational agent evaluation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tu-2024-charactereval-chinese-benchmark-role-playing/). In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1183…
118. Zheni Zeng, Jiayi Chen, Huimin Chen, Yukun Yan, Yuxuan Chen, Zhenghao Liu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2024a. Persllm: A personified training approach for large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2407.12393. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zheni+Zeng%2C+Jiayi+Chen%2C+Huimin+Chen%2C+Yukun+Yan%2C+Yuxuan+Chen%2C+Zhenghao+Liu%2C+Zhiyuan+Liu%2C+and+Maosong+Sun%2E+2024a%2E+Persllm%3A+A+personified+training+approach+for+large+language+models%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A2407)
119. Zheni Zeng, Jiayi Chen, Huimin Chen, Yukun Yan, Yuxuan Chen, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2024b. Persllm: A personified training approach for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12393. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zheni+Zeng%2C+Jiayi+Chen%2C+Huimin+Chen%2C+Yukun+Yan%2C+Yuxuan+Chen%2C+Zhiyuan+Liu%2C+and+Maosong+Sun%2E+2024b%2E+Persllm%3A+A+personified+training+approach+for+large+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2407%2E12393%2E)
120. Zhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun, Yongkang Huang, Chong Long, Xiao Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Jie Tang, and Minlie Huang. 2024. [SafetyBench: Evaluating the safety of large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhang-2023-safetybench-evaluating-safety-large/). In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Pap…
121. Mingqian Zheng, Jiaxin Pei, and David Jurgens. 2023. Is" a helpful assistant" the best role for large language models? a systematic evaluation of social roles in system prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10054. — [arXiv:2311.10054](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10054) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Mingqian+Zheng%2C+Jiaxin+Pei%2C+and+David+Jurgens%2E+2023%2E+Is%22+a+helpful+assistant%22+the+best+role+for+large+language+models%3F+a+systematic+evaluation+of+social+roles+in+system+prompts%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2)
122. Minjun Zhu, Linyi Yang, and Yue Zhang. 2024. [Personality alignment of large language models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/zhu-2024-personality-alignment-large-language-models/). Preprint, arXiv:2408.11779.
123. Lorainne Tudor Car, Dhakshenya Ardhithy Dhinagaran, Bhone Myint Kyaw, Tobias Kowatsch, Shafiq Joty, Yin-Leng Theng, and Rifat Atun. 2020. Conversational agents in health care: scoping review and conceptual analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(8):e17158. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lorainne+Tudor+Car%2C+Dhakshenya+Ardhithy+Dhinagaran%2C+Bhone+Myint+Kyaw%2C+Tobias+Kowatsch%2C+Shafiq+Joty%2C+Yin%2DLeng+Theng%2C+and+Rifat+Atun%2E+2020%2E+Conversational+agents+in+health+care%3A+scoping+review+and+conce)
124. Vasudha Varadarajan, Salvatore Giorgi, Siddharth Mangalik, Nikita Soni, Dave M. Markowitz, and H. Andrew Schwartz. 2025. The consistent lack of variance of psychological factors expressed by LLMs and spambots. In Proceedings of the 1stWorkshop on GenAI Content Detection (GenAIDetect), pages 111–119,… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Vasudha+Varadarajan%2C+Salvatore+Giorgi%2C+Siddharth+Mangalik%2C+Nikita+Soni%2C+Dave+M%2E+Markowitz%2C+and+H%2E+Andrew+Schwartz%2E+2025%2E+The+consistent+lack+of+variance+of+psychological+factors+expressed+by+LLMs+and+)
125. Huy Vu, Huy Anh Nguyen, Adithya V Ganesan, Swanie Juhng, Oscar NE Kjell, Joao Sedoc, Margaret L Kern, Ryan L Boyd, Lyle Ungar, H Andrew Schwartz, et al. 2024. Psychadapter: Adapting llm transformers to reflect traits, personality and mental health. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16882. — [arXiv:2412.16882](https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16882) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Huy+Vu%2C+Huy+Anh+Nguyen%2C+Adithya+V+Ganesan%2C+Swanie+Juhng%2C+Oscar+NE+Kjell%2C+Joao+Sedoc%2C+Margaret+L+Kern%2C+Ryan+L+Boyd%2C+Lyle+Ungar%2C+H+Andrew+Schwartz%2C+et+al%2E+2024%2E+Psychadapter%3A+Adapting+llm+transformers+t)
126. Ruijie Xu, Zengzhi Wang, Run-Ze Fan, and Pengfei Liu. 2024. Benchmarking benchmark leakage in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.18824. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ruijie+Xu%2C+Zengzhi+Wang%2C+Run%2DZe+Fan%2C+and+Pengfei+Liu%2E+2024%2E+Benchmarking+benchmark+leakage+in+large+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2404%2E18824%2E)
127. Tal Yarkoni. 2010. Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of research in personality, 44 3:363–373. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tal+Yarkoni%2E+2010%2E+Personality+in+100%2C000+words%3A+A+large%2Dscale+analysis+of+personality+and+word+use+among+bloggers%2E+Journal+of+research+in+personality%2C+44+3%3A363%E2%80%93373%2E)

*Updated 30 October 2026*