---
title: "Who cites Large language models surpass — 20 citing papers"
description: "20 papers of the Elamur Research library cite «Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results», found in their…"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/luo-2024-large-language-models-surpass/cited-by/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/luo-2024-large-language-models-surpass/cited-by/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [Large language models surpass human experts in…](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/luo-2024-large-language-models-surpass/) / cited by

# Who cites «Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results»

20 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 8 with a page here, the most cited first · [← back to «Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results»](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/luo-2024-large-language-models-surpass/)

1. [**Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants arXiv:2501.04227**Samuel Schmidgall, Yusheng Su, Ze Wang, et al.*2025 · 139 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/schmidgall-2025-agent-laboratory-using-llm/)
2. **[The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/calderon-2025-alternative-annotator-test-llm-as/) [Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/)**Nitay Calderon, Roi Reichart, Rotem Dror*2025 · 52 citations*
3. [**AgentRxiv: Towards Collaborative Autonomous Research arXiv:2503.18102**Samuel Schmidgall, Michael Moor*2025 · 39 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/schmidgall-2025-agentrxiv-collaborative-autonomous-research/)
4. **[All That Glitters is Not Novel: Plagiarism in AI Generated Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/gupta-2025-all-that-glitters-novel/) [Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/)**Tarun Gupta, Danish Pruthi*2025 · 23 citations*
5. **[AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/chen-2025-ai4research-survey-artificial-intelligence/) [Science China Information Sciences](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/science-china-information-sciences/)**Qiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.*2025 · 21 citations*
6. **[LLMs Are Biased Towards Output Formats! Systematically Evaluating and Mitigating Output Format Bias of LLMs](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/long-2025-llms-are-biased-output-formats/) [Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/naacl/)**Do Xuan Long, Hai Nguyen Ngoc, Tiviatis Sim, et al.*2025 · 14 citations*
7. [**Shakespearean Sparks: The Dance of Hallucination and Creativity in LLMs' Decoding Layers arXiv:2503.02851**Zicong He; Boxuan Zhang;, Lu Cheng*2025 · 3 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/he-2025-shakespearean-sparks-dance-hallucination-creativity/)
8. **[Trans-EnV: A Framework for Evaluating the Linguistic Robustness of LLMs Against English Varieties](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lee-2025-trans-env-framework-evaluating-linguistic/) [Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/neural-information-processing-systems/)**Jiyoung Lee, Seungho Kim, Jieun Han, et al.*2025 · 3 citations*

12 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

- [← back to](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/luo-2024-large-language-models-surpass/) — Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results