---
title: "English Verbs Their Use And Misuse by Iraqi Learners Of English"
description: "The paper does not describe the test items or the specific error types. 16 references. Among them: 0."
authors: ["Rafida Mansoor Mahmood"]
year: 2022
venue: "Journal of Arts 1 (مجلة الآداب 1)"
source: "https://aladabj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/aladabjournal/article/view/3555"
licence: "CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; مجلة الآداب)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mahmood-2022-english-verbs-their-use-misuse/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mahmood-2022-english-verbs-their-use-misuse/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2022](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2022/page/6/) / English Verbs Their Use And Misuse by Iraqi Learners Of English Language

# English Verbs Their Use And Misuse by Iraqi Learners Of English Language

**Authors:** Rafida Mansoor Mahmood · **Year:** 2022 · **Venue:** Journal of Arts 1 (مجلة الآداب 1) · **Publisher:** [University of Baghdad](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/publishers/university-of-baghdad/) · **Licence:** [CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; مجلة الآداب)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i90.3555) · [PDF](https://aladabj.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/aladabjournal/article/download/3555/3043) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W4226402514)

**Citations:** 0 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14)

## Summary
The paper looks at how Iraqi university learners of English handle English verbs, a known trouble spot for second-language learners. It first reviews the grammar of verbs as described in standard reference grammars: predicating vs linking verbs, transitive, intransitive and ergative verbs, finite vs non-finite forms, simple vs complex verb phrases, auxiliary placement, the difference between tense and time, and phrasal or prepositional verb idioms. It then discusses factors behind L2 difficulty, mainly learner age, motivation, L1 interference and the amount of input. The empirical part tests one hypothesis: younger morning-programme students use verbs better than older evening-programme students. Fifty randomly chosen fourth-year English majors (25 per group) answered a set of verb questions, and a t-test compared the groups. The morning group scored clearly higher. The author attributes the gap to age and to the shorter evening lectures. The paper does not describe the test items or the specific error types.

## Key points
- Participants were fourth-year students of the English department, College of Arts, Al-Mustansiriyah University, in 2006. They were split evenly between the morning and evening programmes (25 each) and were all chosen at random.
- Mean scores were 2.8 for the morning group and 1.2 for the evening group, with reported variances of 0.9 and 0.7.
- The computed t was 6.41 against a critical value of 2.787, and the difference was declared significant at the 0.05 level in favour of the morning group.
- The grammar review splits complex verb phrases into four construction types: modal, perfective, progressive and passive.
- The explanations offered for the gap are learner age (citing Els et al. and Selinker & Lamendella) and reduced lecture time, meaning more limited L2 input, for evening students.

## Interesting ideas
- Ergative verbs like "open" let the affected entity appear as object in one clause ("I opened the door") and as subject in another ("the door opened"), so the syntactic subject does not always name the agent.
- Word order can tell a particle from a preposition. "Saw the plan through" (persevered) and "saw through the plan" (detected the deception) mean different things, while "read the letter through/through the letter" do not.
- Verb–particle combinations such as "pack one's job in" or "take someone off" (imitate) are non-compositional, and one combination can carry several idiomatic senses depending on its collocates.
- The four complex verb-phrase types (modal, perfective, progressive, passive) combine in a fixed auxiliary order, as in "could have been running".
- Grammatical tense is a language-specific device, while time is universal and independent of language, so the two should not be conflated.

## For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

- **I1** (frames): Role assignment should map the intransitive subject of verbs in ergative/causative-alternation classes to Patient/Theme, not Agent, so that "the door opened" yields an event with an unspecified causer.
- **I2** (tree): The parser could use the "can the word move after the object?" test as a feature or repair rule to choose between compound:prt and a prepositional obl/case attachment.
- **I3** (world): A compiled lexicon of phrasal verbs, keyed by verb+particle plus object type, should supply the frame meaning directly instead of composing it from "pack" and "in".
- **I4** (tokens): Morphology or the tagger could decode an auxiliary chain into explicit features (modality, perfect, progressive, voice) by reading it left to right in this canonical order.
- **I5** (world): The world model can store event time and ordering separately from the surface tense label, so that "will see" or a historical present still get the correct position on the timeline.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

📚 Shelves (4): [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 9,296 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 9,206 works · [💭 Psychology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/psychology/) · 798 works · [💭 Developmental and Educational Psychology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/psychology/developmental-and-educational-psychology/) · 260 works

🧭 Topics (1): [English](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/english/) · 1,373 works

## Cite

Cite as: Rafida Mansoor Mahmood. 2022. English Verbs Their Use And Misuse by Iraqi Learners Of English Language. Journal of Arts 1 (مجلة الآداب 1).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@article{mahmood2022english,
  title = {{English Verbs Their Use And Misuse by Iraqi Learners Of English Language}},
  author = {Rafida Mansoor Mahmood},
  journal = {Journal of Arts 1 (مجلة الآداب 1)},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.31973/aj.v1i90.3555},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i90.3555}
}
```

- [← previous Do Bashal and Hepsō really mean 'boil'? A preliminary study in the semantics of biblical Hebrew and Septuagint Greek](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mangum-2022-bashal-hepso-really-mean-boil/)
- [next → Epistemic Modality in Amharic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/krzyzanowska-2022-epistemic-modality-amharic/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2022](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2022/page/6/)

## References

16 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Akmajian, Adrian and Frank Heny (1976). An introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge: The MIT press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Akmajian%2C+Adrian+and+Frank+Heny+%281976%29%2E+An+introduction+to+the+principles+of+transformational+syntax%2E+Cambridge%3A+The+MIT+press%2E)
2. Alexander L. G. (1997). English Grammar. New York: Longman. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Alexander+L%2E+G%2E+%281997%29%2E+English+Grammar%2E+New+York%3A+Longman%2E)
3. Collins, Coubuild (1990). English Grammar. New Delhi: Collins publishers. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Collins%2C+Coubuild+%281990%29%2E+English+Grammar%2E+New+Delhi%3A+Collins+publishers%2E)
4. Crystal, David (1992). An Encyclopedia dictionary of language and languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Crystal%2C+David+%281992%29%2E+An+Encyclopedia+dictionary+of+language+and+languages%2E+Cambridge%3A+Cambridge+University+press%2E)
5. Crystal, David (2003). A dictionary of linguist & phonetics: London: Oxford University press (5 th . Ed.). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Crystal%2C+David+%282003%29%2E+A+dictionary+of+linguist+%26+phonetics%3A+London%3A+Oxford+University+press+%285+th+%2E+Ed%2E%29%2E)
6. Dixson, Robert J. (2002). Essential Idioms in English. London: Oxford University press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dixson%2C+Robert+J%2E+%282002%29%2E+Essential+Idioms+in+English%2E+London%3A+Oxford+University+press%2E)
7. Eckersley, C.E and J.M Eckersley (1980). A comprehensive English Grammar for foreign students. London: Common wealth press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Eckersley%2C+C%2EE+and+J%2EM+Eckersley+%281980%29%2E+A+comprehensive+English+Grammar+for+foreign+students%2E+London%3A+Common+wealth+press%2E)
8. Elign, Suzette (1979). What is linguistics. London: Michigan University press (2 nd . Ed.). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Elign%2C+Suzette+%281979%29%2E+What+is+linguistics%2E+London%3A+Michigan+University+press+%282+nd+%2E+Ed%2E%29%2E)
9. Els, Theovan, Theo B., Guss. E. Charles V., Anne-Mieke. J (1984). Applied Linguistics and the learning and teaching og foreign languages. London: Edward Arnold publishers. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Els%2C+Theovan%2C+Theo+B%2E%2C+Guss%2E+E%2E+Charles+V%2E%2C+Anne%2DMieke%2E+J+%281984%29%2E+Applied+Linguistics+and+the+learning+and+teaching+og+foreign+languages%2E+London%3A+Edward+Arnold+publishers%2E)
10. Frank, Marcella (1983). Modern English. A practical reference guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Frank%2C+Marcella+%281983%29%2E+Modern+English%2E+A+practical+reference+guide%2E+Cambridge%3A+Cambridge+University+press%2E)
11. Liles, Bruce L. (1971). An introductory transformational grammar. Englewood cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Liles%2C+Bruce+L%2E+%281971%29%2E+An+introductory+transformational+grammar%2E+Englewood+cliffs%3A+Prentice%2DHall%2C+Inc%2E)
12. Lobner, Sebastian (2002). Understanding semantics. Oxford: Oxford University press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lobner%2C+Sebastian+%282002%29%2E+Understanding+semantics%2E+Oxford%3A+Oxford+University+press%2E)
13. Nesfield, J. G. (1982). English grammar series. Idioms, grammar and synthesis. London: Macmillan Inc. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nesfield%2C+J%2E+G%2E+%281982%29%2E+English+grammar+series%2E+Idioms%2C+grammar+and+synthesis%2E+London%3A+Macmillan+Inc%2E)
14. Quirk Randolph, Sidney Green Baum, Geoffrey Leech, Jan Svartvik. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman Group Ltd. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Quirk+Randolph%2C+Sidney+Green+Baum%2C+Geoffrey+Leech%2C+Jan+Svartvik%2E+%281985%29%2E+A+comprehensive+grammar+of+the+English+language%2E+London%3A+Longman+Group+Ltd%2E)
15. Selinker, L., J. Lamendella (1978). Two perspectives on fossilization in inter language learning; inter language studies Bulletin 3, 1978, 143-91. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Selinker%2C+L%2E%2C+J%2E+Lamendella+%281978%29%2E+Two+perspectives+on+fossilization+in+inter+language+learning%3B+inter+language+studies+Bulletin+3%2C+1978%2C+143%2D91%2E)
16. Thomas, Owen (1965). Transformations grammar and the teacher of English. New York: Hlot, Rinehart and Winston Inc. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Thomas%2C+Owen+%281965%29%2E+Transformations+grammar+and+the+teacher+of+English%2E+New+York%3A+Hlot%2C+Rinehart+and+Winston+Inc%2E)

*Updated 24 October 2026*