--- title: "The Biblical Hebrew idiom ‘lift the face’ in the Septuagint of Job — Mangum 2018" description: "Idioms are hard to translate because their meaning cannot be reliably assembled from their words. 15 references." authors: ["Douglas Mangum"] year: 2018 venue: "HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 74" source: "https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/5025" doi: "10.4102/hts.v74i3.5025" licence: "CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies)" licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License" canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mangum-2018-biblical-hebrew-idiom-lift-face/" --- [Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mangum-2018-biblical-hebrew-idiom-lift-face/) [home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2018](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2018/page/5/) / The Biblical Hebrew idiom ‘lift the face’ in the Septuagint of Job # The Biblical Hebrew idiom ‘lift the face’ in the Septuagint of Job **Authors:** [Douglas Mangum](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/douglas-mangum/) · **Year:** 2018 · **Venue:** HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 74 · **Licence:** [CC BY (journal licence per DOAJ; HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) **Links:** [Publisher's page](https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i3.5025) · [PDF](https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/download/5025/11406) · [DOI 10.4102/hts.v74i3.5025](https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i3.5025) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W2886898143) **Citations:** 2 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) ## Summary Idioms are hard to translate because their meaning cannot be reliably assembled from their words. Mangum asks how ancient translators dealt with the Biblical Hebrew idiom "lift the face" (nasa panim). Its meaning ranges from proper respect and acceptance to improper favouritism, and context decides which reading applies. He compares how the Septuagint, the Peshitta and the Targums render its occurrences, and he gives special attention to the Greek Job, a book whose translation is known for literary freedom. Drawing on Translation Studies and cognitive linguistics, he sorts each rendering into four strategy types: formal, semantic, blended, and idiomatic. Most versions mostly copy the Hebrew wording and adjust the verb to fit the context, while plain explanation of the meaning is rare. The Job translator stands apart: he prefers natural Greek idiomatic phrasing and uses the idiom's polysemy to shift theological emphasis. The study refines the common view that ancient Bible translators were mechanically literal. ## Key points - The idiom occurs 28 times in the Hebrew Bible. Across the versions, roughly 60% of renderings are word-for-word, and the Targums go even further in that direction. - The LXX keeps the noun "face" in 80% of its renderings, the Peshitta retains it at a rate of 93%, and the Targums preserve it every time (100%). - The LXX has two stock equivalents: - λαμβάνω τὸ πρόσωπον ("take the face"), which uses the usual verb for nasa; - θαυμάζω τὸ πρόσωπον ("honour the face"), which is not lexically equivalent. - The Aramaic versions mostly use cognate calques, alongside variants meaning "raise" or "brighten the face". - The strategy typology extends Joosten's Types A/B/C with a new Type D (target-language idiom). LXX Job favours Type D. - In Job 42:8 the Greek turns God's acceptance of Job's prayer into forgiveness of the friends' sins. It also has the friends speaking against Job rather than about God. ## Interesting ideas - Each rendering of a figurative phrase is classified on a single axis: keep the form, give the meaning, blend both, or substitute a target-language figure. This makes translation choices countable and comparable across versions. - One idiom can carry a shared core sense (favourable disposition) while surrounding cues decide its polarity (proper respect vs improper bias). This separates lexical meaning from contextual evaluation. - Departures from a stock equivalent are treated as evidence that the translator was reading the context. Deviations from the default carry the signal. - Retention rate of one key component (the noun "face") serves as a simple measurable proxy for how literal a version is. - Several independent ancient versions are compared as parallel witnesses to the same source. Their agreements show the stable reading and their disagreements show the ambiguity. ## For Mova How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests: - **I1** (back): Generation and translation through the meta-world could tag each idiom output with a strategy type, so the system can explain whether it preserved form, explained meaning, or substituted an equivalent idiom. - **I2** (frames): Idiom frames in prag could store a core relation plus an evaluation slot filled from context, so "lift the face" and English analogues like "play favourites" get explainable polarity. - **I3** (learn): When witness parsers or teachers depart from their usual output for a construction, Mova could flag those spots as context-sensitive cases worth targeted review or repair rules. - **I4** (learn): Evaluating the text → graph → text compressor could track how often key lexical anchors survive the round trip, a cheap literalness metric beside meaning checks. - **I5** (world): A compiled idiom lexicon could record multiple attested paraphrases per idiom, with disagreements marking senses that the world model must resolve from context. *Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.* Fields: [Linguistics & languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/linguistics/) Topics: [🏺 Ancient Greek](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/ancient-greek/) · [🕎 Hebrew & Aramaic](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/hebrew-aramaic/) · [🐪 Semitic languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/semitic-languages/) · [🧷 Idioms & multiword expressions](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/multiword-expressions/) ## Institutions - [University of the Free State](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/university-of-the-free-state/) — University, Bloemfontein, South Africa · 13 works · 92 citations ## Cite Cite as: Douglas Mangum. 2018. The Biblical Hebrew idiom ‘lift the face’ in the Septuagint of Job. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 74. The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. ```bibtex @article{mangum2018biblical, title = {{The Biblical Hebrew idiom ‘lift the face’ in the Septuagint of Job}}, author = {Douglas Mangum}, journal = {HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 74}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.4102/hts.v74i3.5025}, url = {https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i3.5025} } ``` - [← previous Parser combinators for Tigrinya and Oromo morphology](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/littell-2018-parser-combinators-tigrinya-oromo-morphology/) - [next → Constructing an Annotated Resource for Part-Of-Speech Tagging of Mishnaic Hebrew](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/giovannetti-2018-constructing-annotated-resource-part-speech/) - [↑ back to papers of 2018](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2018/page/5/) ## References 15 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet. 1. Adams, J.N., 1990, The Latin sexual vocabulary, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Adams%2C+J%2EN%2E%2C+1990%2C+The+Latin+sexual+vocabulary%2C+The+Johns+Hopkins+University+Press%2C+Baltimore%2C+MD%2E) 2. Baker, M., 2011, In other words: A coursebook on translation, 2nd edn., Routledge, London. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Baker%2C+M%2E%2C+2011%2C+In+other+words%3A+A+coursebook+on+translation%2C+2nd+edn%2E%2C+Routledge%2C+London%2E) 3. Bauer, W.F., Danker, F.W., Arndt, W.F. & Gingrich, F.W. (eds.), 2000, A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature, 3rd edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [BDAG] [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bauer%2C+W%2EF%2E%2C+Danker%2C+F%2EW%2E%2C+Arndt%2C+W%2EF%2E+%26+Gingrich%2C+F%2EW%2E+%28eds%2E%29%2C+2000%2C+A+Greek%2DEnglish+lexicon+of+the+New+Testament+and+other+early+Christian+literature%2C+3rd+edn%2E%2C+University+of+Chicago+Press%2C+Chicago%2E) 4. Taylor, J.R., 2012, The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Taylor%2C+J%2ER%2E%2C+2012%2C+The+mental+corpus%3A+How+language+is+represented+in+the+mind%2C+Oxford+University+Press%2C+Oxford%2E) 5. Thackeray, H., 1909, A grammar of the Old Testament in Greek: According to the Septuagint, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Thackeray%2C+H%2E%2C+1909%2C+A+grammar+of+the+Old+Testament+in+Greek%3A+According+to+the+Septuagint%2C+Cambridge+University+Press%2C+Cambridge%2E) 6. Toury, G., 2012, Descriptive translation studies and beyond, rev. ed., John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Toury%2C+G%2E%2C+2012%2C+Descriptive+translation+studies+and+beyond%2C+rev%2E+ed%2E%2C+John+Benjamins%2C+Amsterdam%2E) 7. Unseth, P., 1996, ‘Teaching the translation of euphemisms’, Notes on Translation 10(2), 35–40. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Unseth%2C+P%2E%2C+1996%2C+%E2%80%98Teaching+the+translation+of+euphemisms%E2%80%99%2C+Notes+on+Translation+10%282%29%2C+35%E2%80%9340%2E) 8. Butts, A.M., 2016, Language change in the wake of empire: Syriac in its Greco-Roman context, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, IN. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Butts%2C+A%2EM%2E%2C+2016%2C+Language+change+in+the+wake+of+empire%3A+Syriac+in+its+Greco%2DRoman+context%2C+Eisenbrauns%2C+Winona+Lake%2C+IN%2E) 9. Warren-Rothlin, A., 2013, ‘Idioms: Biblical Hebrew’, in G. Khan (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 227–229, Brill, Leiden. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Warren%2DRothlin%2C+A%2E%2C+2013%2C+%E2%80%98Idioms%3A+Biblical+Hebrew%E2%80%99%2C+in+G%2E+Khan+%28ed%2E%29%2C+Encyclopedia+of+Hebrew+language+and+linguistics%2C+vol%2E+2%2C+pp%2E+227%E2%80%93229%2C+Brill%2C+Leiden%2E) 10. Clines, D.J.A. (ed.), 1993–2014, Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, 9 vols., Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield. [DCH] [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Clines%2C+D%2EJ%2EA%2E+%28ed%2E%29%2C+1993%E2%80%932014%2C+Dictionary+of+Classical+Hebrew%2C+9+vols%2E%2C+Sheffield+Academic+Press%2C+Sheffield%2E+%5BDCH%5D) 11. Weinreich, U., 1969, ‘Problems in the analysis of idioms’, in J. Puhvel (ed.), Substance and structure of language, pp. 23–81, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Weinreich%2C+U%2E%2C+1969%2C+%E2%80%98Problems+in+the+analysis+of+idioms%E2%80%99%2C+in+J%2E+Puhvel+%28ed%2E%29%2C+Substance+and+structure+of+language%2C+pp%2E+23%E2%80%9381%2C+University+of+California+Press%2C+Berkeley%2C+CA%2E) 12. Cook, J., 2011a, ‘In search of the Old Greek of Job’, Journal for Semitics 20(1), 213–232. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cook%2C+J%2E%2C+2011a%2C+%E2%80%98In+search+of+the+Old+Greek+of+Job%E2%80%99%2C+Journal+for+Semitics+20%281%29%2C+213%E2%80%93232%2E) 13. Cook, J., 2011b, ‘The profile and some theological aspects of the Old Greek of Job – Resurrection and life after death as points in case’, Old Testament Essays 24(2), 324–345. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cook%2C+J%2E%2C+2011b%2C+%E2%80%98The+profile+and+some+theological+aspects+of+the+Old+Greek+of+Job+%E2%80%93+Resurrection+and+life+after+death+as+points+in+case%E2%80%99%2C+Old+Testament+Essays+24%282%29%2C+324%E2%80%93345%2E) 14. Wevers, J.W., 1993, Notes on the Greek text of Genesis, Scholars Press, Atlanta, GA. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wevers%2C+J%2EW%2E%2C+1993%2C+Notes+on+the+Greek+text+of+Genesis%2C+Scholars+Press%2C+Atlanta%2C+GA%2E) 15. Ziegler, J. (ed.), 1982, Iob, Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum Graecum, vol. XI, 4, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ziegler%2C+J%2E+%28ed%2E%29%2C+1982%2C+Iob%2C+Septuaginta%3A+Vetus+Testamentum+Graecum%2C+vol%2E+XI%2C+4%2C+Vandenhoeck+%26+Ruprecht%2C+G%C3%B6ttingen%2E)