---
title: "Risk-Controlled Event-Driven Cascading Updates for Knowledge"
description: "The authors define this as event-driven cascading updating: a trigger event causes explicit changes, and each round of… 35 references."
authors: ["Bo Ni", "Qinwen Ge", "Haowei Fu", "Ryan A. Rossi", "Xiaorui Liu", "Jiejun Xu", "Tyler Derr"]
year: 2026
venue: "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026"
source: "https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-acl.2111/"
doi: "10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2111"
licence: "CC BY 4.0 (ACL Anthology)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ni-2026-risk-controlled-event-driven-cascading/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ni-2026-risk-controlled-event-driven-cascading/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2026](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2026/page/41/) / Risk-Controlled Event-Driven Cascading Updates for Knowledge Graph Consistency Restoration

# Risk-Controlled Event-Driven Cascading Updates for Knowledge Graph Consistency Restoration

**Authors:** [Bo Ni](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/bo-ni/), Qinwen Ge, Haowei Fu, [Ryan A. Rossi](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/ryan-a-rossi/), Xiaorui Liu, Jiejun Xu and Tyler Derr · **Year:** 2026 · **Venue:** [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/) ([Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2026](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/2026/)) · **Publisher:** [Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/publishers/association-for-computational-linguistics/) · **Licence:** [CC BY 4.0 (ACL Anthology)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-acl.2111/) · [PDF](https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-acl.2111.pdf) · [DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2111](https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2111) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W7166810979)

**Citations:** 0 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14)

## Summary
When a knowledge graph receives a new fact, older facts that depended on the previous state of the world can become wrong. Fixing one of them may then reveal more outdated relations further along the graph. Existing dynamic-KG and KG-update methods mostly handle such changes as isolated or one-hop edits. The authors define this as event-driven cascading updating: a trigger event causes explicit changes, and each round of changes drives the next one until the graph is consistent again.

Their framework, CascadeKG, has two parts:
- **Risk control:** Learn-Then-Test calibration bounds expected recall risk over the whole multi-hop cascade, which limits error accumulation without letting the set of predicted edges grow out of control. It works with any scoring model.
- **Scoring model:** TAUS is a text-augmented GNN that uses LLM-generated descriptions of events to add world knowledge to the graph representations.

On two new benchmarks built from ICEWS and YAGO/Wiki data, TAUS outperforms embedding, GNN and LM-based baselines. The calibration meets the target coverage while producing the smallest prediction sets. This makes automated KG maintenance more reliable.

## Key points
- New benchmarks ICEWS14-Event and YAGO-Event model scenarios where one event requires coordinated multi-hop revisions. Code and data are released at github.com/Arstanley/cascadekg.
- TAUS reaches an F1 of 0.880 and an accuracy of 0.866, ahead of TransE, R-GAT and SimKGC. Other compared backbones include DistMult, CompGCN and HittER.
- The LTT-based calibration keeps valid coverage at every tested risk level α. It yields the smallest prediction sets, especially when paired with TAUS.
- The task is framed as restoring consistency immediately after an event, not as forecasting future facts.
- Limitations:
  - The guarantees assume calibration and test data come from the same distribution, so data that shifts over time may require re-calibration.
  - The experiments mainly test edge additions rather than deletions.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

## Institutions

- [Adobe Systems](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/companies/adobe-systems/) — Company, San Jose, United States · 35 works · 3,711 citations
- [Vanderbilt University](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/vanderbilt-university/) — University, Nashville, United States · 14 works · 1,413 citations
- [North Carolina State University](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/north-carolina-state-university/) — University, Raleigh, United States · 13 works · 406 citations

Also on the byline: [HRL Laboratories](https://ror.org/05p7te762).

📚 Shelves (4): [🖥️ Computer Science](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/) · 16,667 works · [🤖 Artificial Intelligence](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/) · 16,194 works · [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 16,039 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 15,891 works

🧭 Topics (1): [🕸️ Knowledge graphs & ontologies](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/knowledge-graphs/) · 192 works

## Cite

Cite as: Bo Ni, Qinwen Ge, Haowei Fu, Ryan A. Rossi, Xiaorui Liu, Jiejun Xu and Tyler Derr. 2026. Risk-Controlled Event-Driven Cascading Updates for Knowledge Graph Consistency Restoration. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{ni2026risk,
  title = {{Risk-Controlled Event-Driven Cascading Updates for Knowledge Graph Consistency Restoration}},
  author = {Bo Ni, Qinwen Ge, Haowei Fu, Ryan A. Rossi, Xiaorui Liu, Jiejun Xu and Tyler Derr},
  booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2111},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2111}
}
```

- [← previous RightNow-Arabic-0.5B-Turbo: An Open Sub-1B Arabic Language Model via Vocabulary Injection and Edge-First Deployment](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/jaber-2026-rightnow-arabic-0-5b-turbo/)
- [next → RiT: Rubrics-in-Thinking Reinforcement Learning for Improved Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tian-2026-rit-rubrics-thinking-reinforcement-learning/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2026](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2026/page/41/)

## References

35 references, 4 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Anastasios N. Angelopoulos and Stephen Bates. 2022. A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. Preprint, arXiv:2107.07511. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Anastasios+N%2E+Angelopoulos+and+Stephen+Bates%2E+2022%2E+A+gentle+introduction+to+conformal+prediction+and+distribution%2Dfree+uncertainty+quantification%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A2107%2E07511%2E)
2. Anastasios N. Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Emmanuel J. Candès, Michael I. Jordan, and Lihua Lei. 2022. Learn then test: Calibrating predictive algorithms to achieve risk control. Preprint, arXiv:2110.01052. — [arXiv:2110.01052](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01052) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Anastasios+N%2E+Angelopoulos%2C+Stephen+Bates%2C+Emmanuel+J%2E+Cand%C3%A8s%2C+Michael+I%2E+Jordan%2C+and+Lihua+Lei%2E+2022%2E+Learn+then+test%3A+Calibrating+predictive+algorithms+to+achieve+risk+control%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A2110%2E)
3. Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. [Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bordes-2013-translating-embeddings-modeling-multi-relational/). In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pages 2787–2795.
4. Elizabeth Boschee, Jennifer Lautenschlager, Sean O’Brien, Steve Shellman, James Starz, and Michael Ward. 2015. ICEWS Coded Event Data. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Elizabeth+Boschee%2C+Jennifer+Lautenschlager%2C+Sean+O%E2%80%99Brien%2C+Steve+Shellman%2C+James+Starz%2C+and+Michael+Ward%2E+2015%2E+ICEWS+Coded+Event+Data%2E)
5. Dan Busbridge, Dane Sherburn, Pietro Cavallo, and Nils Y Hammerla. 2019. Relational graph attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05811. — [arXiv:1904.05811](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05811) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dan+Busbridge%2C+Dane+Sherburn%2C+Pietro+Cavallo%2C+and+Nils+Y+Hammerla%2E+2019%2E+Relational+graph+attention+networks%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A1904%2E05811%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A1904%2E05811%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fabs%2F1904%2E05811%29)
6. Li Cai, Xin Mao, Yuhao Zhou, Zhaoguang Long, Changxu Wu, and Man Lan. 2024. A survey on temporal knowledge graph: Representation learning and applications. Preprint, arXiv:2403.04782. — [arXiv:2403.04782](https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04782) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Li+Cai%2C+Xin+Mao%2C+Yuhao+Zhou%2C+Zhaoguang+Long%2C+Changxu+Wu%2C+and+Man+Lan%2E+2024%2E+A+survey+on+temporal+knowledge+graph%3A+Representation+learning+and+applications%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A2403%2E04782%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2403%2E04)
7. Sanxing Chen, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Jian Jiao, Ruofei Zhang, and Yangfeng Ji. 2021. HittER: Hierarchical transformers for knowledge graph embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 10395–10407, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican R… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sanxing+Chen%2C+Xiaodong+Liu%2C+Jianfeng+Gao%2C+Jian+Jiao%2C+Ruofei+Zhang%2C+and+Yangfeng+Ji%2E+2021%2E+HittER%3A+Hierarchical+transformers+for+knowledge+graph+embeddings%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+2021+Conference+on+Emp)
8. Zhe Chen, Yuehan Wang, Bin Zhao, Jing Cheng, Xin Zhao, and Zongtao Duan. 2020. Knowledge graph completion: A review. IEEE Access, 8:192435– 192456. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zhe+Chen%2C+Yuehan+Wang%2C+Bin+Zhao%2C+Jing+Cheng%2C+Xin+Zhao%2C+and+Zongtao+Duan%2E+2020%2E+Knowledge+graph+completion%3A+A+review%2E+IEEE+Access%2C+8%3A192435%E2%80%93+192456%2E)
9. Shib Sankar Dasgupta, Swayambhu Nath Ray, and Partha Talukdar. 2018. Hyte: Hyperplane-based temporally aware knowledge graph embedding. In Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 2001– 2011. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shib+Sankar+Dasgupta%2C+Swayambhu+Nath+Ray%2C+and+Partha+Talukdar%2E+2018%2E+Hyte%3A+Hyperplane%2Dbased+temporally+aware+knowledge+graph+embedding%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+2018+conference+on+empirical+methods+in+na)
10. Wenchong He, Zhe Jiang, Tingsong Xiao, Zelin Xu, and Yukun Li. 2025. A survey on uncertainty quantification methods for deep learning. Preprint, arXiv:2302.13425. — [arXiv:2302.13425](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13425) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wenchong+He%2C+Zhe+Jiang%2C+Tingsong+Xiao%2C+Zelin+Xu%2C+and+Yukun+Li%2E+2025%2E+A+survey+on+uncertainty+quantification+methods+for+deep+learning%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A2302%2E13425%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2302%2E13425%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eor)
11. Shaoxiong Ji, Shirui Pan, Erik Cambria, Pekka Marttinen, and Philip S. Yu. 2022. A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(2):494–514. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shaoxiong+Ji%2C+Shirui+Pan%2C+Erik+Cambria%2C+Pekka+Marttinen%2C+and+Philip+S%2E+Yu%2E+2022%2E+A+survey+on+knowledge+graphs%3A+Representation%2C+acquisition%2C+and+applications%2E+IEEE+Transactions+on+Neural+Networks+and+L)
12. Xuhui Jiang, Chengjin Xu, Yinghan Shen, Xun Sun, Lumingyuan Tang, Saizhuo Wang, Zhongwu Chen, Yuanzhuo Wang, and Jian Guo. 2025. On the evolution of knowledge graphs: A survey and perspective. Preprint, arXiv:2310.04835. — [arXiv:2310.04835](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04835) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Xuhui+Jiang%2C+Chengjin+Xu%2C+Yinghan+Shen%2C+Xun+Sun%2C+Lumingyuan+Tang%2C+Saizhuo+Wang%2C+Zhongwu+Chen%2C+Yuanzhuo+Wang%2C+and+Jian+Guo%2E+2025%2E+On+the+evolution+of+knowledge+graphs%3A+A+survey+and+perspective%2E+Preprin)
13. Adrian Kochsiek, Apoorv Saxena, Inderjeet Nair, and Rainer Gemulla. 2023. Friendly neighbors: Contextualized sequence-to-sequence link prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13059. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Adrian+Kochsiek%2C+Apoorv+Saxena%2C+Inderjeet+Nair%2C+and+Rainer+Gemulla%2E+2023%2E+Friendly+neighbors%3A+Contextualized+sequence%2Dto%2Dsequence+link+prediction%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2305%2E13059%2E)
14. Jiaqing Liang, Sheng Zhang, and Yanghua Xiao. 2017. How to keep a knowledge base synchronized with its encyclopedia source. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pages 1917–1926. ACM. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jiaqing+Liang%2C+Sheng+Zhang%2C+and+Yanghua+Xiao%2E+2017%2E+How+to+keep+a+knowledge+base+synchronized+with+its+encyclopedia+source%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+2017+ACM+on+Conference+on+Information+and+Knowledge+Ma)
15. Lihui Liu, Boxin Du, Heng Ji, and Hanghang Tong. 2020. Kompare: A knowledge graph comparative reasoning system. Preprint, arXiv:2011.03189. — [arXiv:2011.03189](https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03189) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lihui+Liu%2C+Boxin+Du%2C+Heng+Ji%2C+and+Hanghang+Tong%2E+2020%2E+Kompare%3A+A+knowledge+graph+comparative+reasoning+system%2E+Preprint%2C+arXiv%3A2011%2E03189%2E+%E2%80%94+%5BarXiv%3A2011%2E03189%5D%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv%2Eorg%2Fabs%2F2011%2E03189%29)
16. Mohamed Morsey, Jens Lehmann, Sören Auer, Claus Stadler, and Sebastian Hellmann. 2012. Dbpedia and the live extraction of structured data from wikipedia. Program, 46(2):157–181. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Mohamed+Morsey%2C+Jens+Lehmann%2C+S%C3%B6ren+Auer%2C+Claus+Stadler%2C+and+Sebastian+Hellmann%2E+2012%2E+Dbpedia+and+the+live+extraction+of+structured+data+from+wikipedia%2E+Program%2C+46%282%29%3A157%E2%80%93181%2E)
17. Bo Ni, Zheyuan Liu, Leyao Wang, Yongjia Lei, Yuying Zhao, Xueqi Cheng, Qingkai Zeng, Luna Dong, Yinglong Xia, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Ryan Rossi, Franck Dernoncourt, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Nesreen Ahmed, Xiaorui Liu, Wenqi Fan, Erik Blasch, Yu Wang, Meng Jiang, and Tyler Derr. 2025a. Towards trustworthy r… — [arXiv:2502.06872](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06872) [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bo+Ni%2C+Zheyuan+Liu%2C+Leyao+Wang%2C+Yongjia+Lei%2C+Yuying+Zhao%2C+Xueqi+Cheng%2C+Qingkai+Zeng%2C+Luna+Dong%2C+Yinglong+Xia%2C+Krishnaram+Kenthapadi%2C+Ryan+Rossi%2C+Franck+Dernoncourt%2C+Md+Mehrab+Tanjim%2C+Nesreen+Ahmed%2C+Xi)
18. Bo Ni, Yu Wang, Lu Cheng, Erik Blasch, and Tyler Derr. 2025b. Towards trustworthy knowledge graph reasoning: An uncertainty aware perspective. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 39, pages 12417–12425. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bo+Ni%2C+Yu+Wang%2C+Lu+Cheng%2C+Erik+Blasch%2C+and+Tyler+Derr%2E+2025b%2E+Towards+trustworthy+knowledge+graph+reasoning%3A+An+uncertainty+aware+perspective%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+AAAI+conference+on+artificial+intel)
19. Ankur Padia, Francis Ferraro, and Tim Finin. 2024. Enhancing knowledge graph consistency through open large language models: A case study. Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, 3(1):203–208. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ankur+Padia%2C+Francis+Ferraro%2C+and+Tim+Finin%2E+2024%2E+Enhancing+knowledge+graph+consistency+through+open+large+language+models%3A+A+case+study%2E+Proceedings+of+the+AAAI+Symposium+Series%2C+3%281%29%3A203%E2%80%93208%2E)
20. Ethan Perez, Florian Strub, Harm de Vries, Vincent Dumoulin, and Aaron Courville. 2017. [Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/perez-2017-film-visual-reasoning-general-conditioning/). Preprint, arXiv:1709.07871.
21. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. [Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/reimers-2019-sentence-bert-sentence-embeddings-siamese/). Preprint, arXiv:1908.10084.
22. Yu Rong, Tingyang Xu, Junzhou Huang, Wenbing Huang, Hong Cheng, Yao Ma, Yiqi Wang, Tyler Derr, Lingfei Wu, and Tengfei Ma. 2020. Deep graph learning: Foundations, advances and applications. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, pages 355… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Yu+Rong%2C+Tingyang+Xu%2C+Junzhou+Huang%2C+Wenbing+Huang%2C+Hong+Cheng%2C+Yao+Ma%2C+Yiqi+Wang%2C+Tyler+Derr%2C+Lingfei+Wu%2C+and+Tengfei+Ma%2E+2020%2E+Deep+graph+learning%3A+Foundations%2C+advances+and+applications%2E+In+Proceed)
23. Apoorv Saxena, Adrian Kochsiek, and Rainer Gemulla. 2022. Sequence-to-sequence knowledge graph completion and question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10321. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Apoorv+Saxena%2C+Adrian+Kochsiek%2C+and+Rainer+Gemulla%2E+2022%2E+Sequence%2Dto%2Dsequence+knowledge+graph+completion+and+question+answering%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2203%2E10321%2E)
24. Michael Schlichtkrull, Thomas N Kipf, Peter Bloem, Rianne Van Den Berg, Ivan Titov, and Max Welling. 2018. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In The Semantic Web (ESWC), pages 593–607. Springer. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Michael+Schlichtkrull%2C+Thomas+N+Kipf%2C+Peter+Bloem%2C+Rianne+Van+Den+Berg%2C+Ivan+Titov%2C+and+Max+Welling%2E+2018%2E+Modeling+relational+data+with+graph+convolutional+networks%2E+In+The+Semantic+Web+%28ESWC%29%2C+pages)
25. Fabian M. Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’07, page 697–706, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Fabian+M%2E+Suchanek%2C+Gjergji+Kasneci%2C+and+Gerhard+Weikum%2E+2007%2E+Yago%3A+a+core+of+semantic+knowledge%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+16th+International+Conference+on+World+Wide+Web%2C+WWW+%E2%80%9907%2C+page+697%E2%80%93706%2C+New+Yor)
26. Jizhi Tang, Yansong Feng, and Dongyan Zhao. 2019. Learning to update knowledge graphs by reading news. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 2632–2641,… [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jizhi+Tang%2C+Yansong+Feng%2C+and+Dongyan+Zhao%2E+2019%2E+Learning+to+update+knowledge+graphs+by+reading+news%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+2019+Conference+on+Empirical+Methods+in+Natural+Language+Processing+and+the)
27. Rakshit Trivedi, Hanjun Dai, Yichen Wang, and Le Song. 2017. Know-evolve: Deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs. In international conference on machine learning, pages 3462–3471. PMLR. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rakshit+Trivedi%2C+Hanjun+Dai%2C+Yichen+Wang%2C+and+Le+Song%2E+2017%2E+Know%2Devolve%3A+Deep+temporal+reasoning+for+dynamic+knowledge+graphs%2E+In+international+conference+on+machine+learning%2C+pages+3462%E2%80%933471%2E+PMLR%2E)
28. Shikhar Vashishth, Soumya Sanyal, Vikram Nitin, and Partha Talukdar. 2019. Composition-based multi-relational graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03082. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Shikhar+Vashishth%2C+Soumya+Sanyal%2C+Vikram+Nitin%2C+and+Partha+Talukdar%2E+2019%2E+Composition%2Dbased+multi%2Drelational+graph+convolutional+networks%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A1911%2E03082%2E)
29. Vladimir Vovk, Alexander Gammerman, and Glenn Shafer. 2005. Algorithmic Learning in a Random World. Springer. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Vladimir+Vovk%2C+Alexander+Gammerman%2C+and+Glenn+Shafer%2E+2005%2E+Algorithmic+Learning+in+a+Random+World%2E+Springer%2E)
30. Liang Wang, Wei Zhao, Zhuoyu Wei, and Jingming Liu. 2022. Simkgc: Simple contrastive knowledge graph completion with pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02167. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Liang+Wang%2C+Wei+Zhao%2C+Zhuoyu+Wei%2C+and+Jingming+Liu%2E+2022%2E+Simkgc%3A+Simple+contrastive+knowledge+graph+completion+with+pre%2Dtrained+language+models%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A2203%2E02167%2E)
31. Quan Wang, Zhendong Mao, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. 2017. Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 29(12):2724–2743. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Quan+Wang%2C+Zhendong+Mao%2C+Bin+Wang%2C+and+Li+Guo%2E+2017%2E+Knowledge+graph+embedding%3A+A+survey+of+approaches+and+applications%2E+IEEE+transactions+on+knowledge+and+data+engineering%2C+29%2812%29%3A2724%E2%80%932743%2E)
32. Xiangyu Wang, Lyuzhou Chen, Taiyu Ban, Muhammad Usman, Yifeng Guan, Shikang Liu, Tianhao Wu, and Huanhuan Chen. 2021. Knowledge graph quality control: A survey. Fundamental Research, 1(5):607– 626. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Xiangyu+Wang%2C+Lyuzhou+Chen%2C+Taiyu+Ban%2C+Muhammad+Usman%2C+Yifeng+Guan%2C+Shikang+Liu%2C+Tianhao+Wu%2C+and+Huanhuan+Chen%2E+2021%2E+Knowledge+graph+quality+control%3A+A+survey%2E+Fundamental+Research%2C+1%285%29%3A607%E2%80%93+626%2E)
33. Yu Wang, Amin Javari, Janani Balaji, Walid Shalaby, Tyler Derr, and Xiquan Cui. 2024. Knowledge graph-based session recommendation with session-adaptive propagation. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pages 264–273. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Yu+Wang%2C+Amin+Javari%2C+Janani+Balaji%2C+Walid+Shalaby%2C+Tyler+Derr%2C+and+Xiquan+Cui%2E+2024%2E+Knowledge+graph%2Dbased+session+recommendation+with+session%2Dadaptive+propagation%2E+In+Companion+Proceedings+of+the+AC)
34. Bishan Yang, Wen-tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. 2015. [Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/yang-2014-embedding-entities-relations-learning-inference/). In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
35. Zhaocheng Zhu, Zuobai Zhang, Louis-Pascal Xhonneux, and Jian Tang. 2021. Neural bellman-ford networks: A general graph neural network framework for link prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:29476–29490. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zhaocheng+Zhu%2C+Zuobai+Zhang%2C+Louis%2DPascal+Xhonneux%2C+and+Jian+Tang%2E+2021%2E+Neural+bellman%2Dford+networks%3A+A+general+graph+neural+network+framework+for+link+prediction%2E+Advances+in+neural+information+proc)

*Updated 1 November 2026*