---
title: "Who cites Mind the Blind Spots: A — 9 citing papers"
description: "9 papers of the Elamur Research library cite «Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews», found in their…"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shin-2025-mind-blind-spots-focus-level/cited-by/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shin-2025-mind-blind-spots-focus-level/cited-by/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation…](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shin-2025-mind-blind-spots-focus-level/) / cited by

# Who cites «Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews»

9 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · [← back to «Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews»](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shin-2025-mind-blind-spots-focus-level/)

1. **[AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/chen-2025-ai4research-survey-artificial-intelligence/) [Science China Information Sciences](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/science-china-information-sciences/)**Qiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.*2025 · 21 citations*
2. **[Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer Reviews](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/vasu-2026-justice-judgment-unveiling-hidden-bias/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Sai Suresh Macharla Vasu, Ivaxi Sheth, Hui-Po Wang, et al.*2026 · 8 citations*
3. **[Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/dycke-2026-automatic-reviewers-fail-detect-faulty/) [Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/tacl/)**Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych*2026 · 5 citations*
4. **[RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wu-2026-rbtact-rebuttal-as-supervision-actionable/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Sihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao, et al.*2026 · 2 citations*
5. **[Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wu-2026-can-ai-be-good-peer/) [Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/acl/)**Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.*2026 · 1 citation*

4 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

- [← back to](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shin-2025-mind-blind-spots-focus-level/) — Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews