---
title: "A Tool for Extracting Conversational Implicatures — Tatu 2012"
description: "The authors use English Twitter dialogues from the Microsoft Research Conversation (MRC) corpus and… 19 references, cited by 1 paper here."
authors: ["Marta Tatu", "Dan Moldovan"]
year: 2012
venue: "Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12)"
source: "https://aclanthology.org/L12-1039/"
licence: "CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (ACL Anthology, before 2016)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tatu-2012-tool-extracting-conversational-implicatures/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tatu-2012-tool-extracting-conversational-implicatures/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [2012](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2012/page/2/) / A Tool for Extracting Conversational Implicatures

# A Tool for Extracting Conversational Implicatures

**Authors:** Marta Tatu and [Dan Moldovan](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/dan-moldovan/) · **Year:** 2012 · **Venue:** [Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/lrec/) ([LREC 2012](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/lrec/2012/)) · **Publisher:** [European Language Resources Association (ELRA)](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/publishers/european-language-resources-association-elra/) · **Licence:** [CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (ACL Anthology, before 2016)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://aclanthology.org/L12-1039/) · [PDF](https://aclanthology.org/L12-1039.pdf) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W2251998317)

**Citations:** 1 citations (OpenAlex, 2026-10-14) · [1](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tatu-2012-tool-extracting-conversational-implicatures/cited-by/) in our library, of the 141,840 papers whose bibliographies we read

## Summary
The paper addresses the gap between what a conversational turn literally says and what the speaker means: Grice's conversational implicatures. The authors use English Twitter dialogues from the Microsoft Research Conversation (MRC) corpus and build a comparable Arabic Twitter corpus. They then convert Lymba's logic-based textual-entailment prover COGEX into a non-monotonic, abductive engine.

Each turn becomes a deep semantic first-order logical form, with indexicals such as *I* and *you* bound to the actual participants of that turn. The prover draws on several kinds of knowledge:
- lexical-chain axioms mined from eXtended WordNet (Arabic WordNet for Arabic),
- rules that compose pairs of semantic relations,
- common-sense knowledge,
- Grice's maxims recast as default macro-axioms.

Results are stored in an eight-component implicature model, and the conversation's common ground is updated after every turn. On manually annotated English utterances, the system derives entailments and implicatures with an F-measure of 70.42%. The work shows that implied meaning can be represented explicitly and traced through inspectable inference steps.

## Key points
- The implicature model is an 8-tuple {S_U, S_I, H_TM, H_TE, H_I, C, GM, K}. It covers the speaker's utterance and intentions, the hearer's understanding, entailments and implicatures, the context, the maxim status (none violated, clash, or flouted) and the needed common-sense knowledge.
- The data are MRC (about 1.3 million open-domain Twitter conversations) and a new Arabic corpus of 4,000 conversations among 2,067 users. The Arabic threads were assembled backwards from reply tweets.
- Gold annotation covers implicature-model components for 253 English and 75 Arabic utterances. The Relevance maxim is exploited most often, and Manner floutings are another major source.
- The system uses 86 hand-derived, language-independent semantic calculus axioms of the form R1 ∘ R2 → R0, each with accuracy measured on a large corpus. Lexical chain axioms are generated on demand.
- COGEX was changed in three ways: dialog-aware logical forms for English and Arabic, semantic axiom generation, and support for non-monotonic reasoning.

## Interesting ideas
- Grice's maxims are encoded as default rules that fire on utterance-type predicates; for example, Quality plus an exclamatory turn yields "speaker shows strong feeling." This turns vague pragmatic principles into explicit, traceable inference steps.
- A small set of relation-composition rules lets the reasoner bridge concepts that have no direct link, such as part-whole transitivity or parts inheriting their whole's location, and each rule's reliability is measured empirically.
- Before building the logical form, indexicals are resolved to the concrete speaker and hearer of each turn, and the common ground is updated incrementally after every turn.
- Surface cues such as capitalized characters, utterance type and elongated interjections ("Eeeeeee") become explicit predicates in the semantic representation, so the reasoner can use them as evidence of attitude.
- The authors argue for keeping several competing implicature readings alive and letting later turns disambiguate them, rather than committing early.

## For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

- **I1** (frames): crate prag could express its implicature and irony rules as defeasible maxim-triggered axioms keyed on speech-act type, so every derived implicature cites the maxim that produced it.
- **I2** (world): the world builder could hold a compact, accuracy-scored table of role/relation compositions to infer holdings and locations, discarding rules whose measured precision is low.
- **I3** (frames): coreference for dialogues and fable dialogues could bind I/you per turn before frame extraction, keeping a running common-ground store that later turns read from.
- **I4** (tokens): the tokenizer and tagger could emit flags for all-caps, letter elongation and interjections as features that prag consumes for emotion and irony detection.
- **I5** (answer): readers answering questions about dialogues could hold ranked alternative interpretations and retract cancelled implicatures when subsequent text contradicts them.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

## Institutions

- [The University of Texas at Dallas](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/universities/the-university-of-texas-at-dallas/) — University, Richardson, United States · 47 works · 5,363 citations
- [Lymba](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/companies/lymba/) — Company, Richardson, United States · 2 works · 200 citations

📚 Shelves (4): [🖥️ Computer Science](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/) · 9,086 works · [🤖 Artificial Intelligence](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/computer-science/artificial-intelligence/) · 8,889 works · [🎭 Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) · 9,296 works · [🗣️ Language and Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/language-and-linguistics/) · 9,206 works

🧭 Topics (3): [English](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/english/) · 1,373 works · [Semitic languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/semitic-languages/) · 1,484 works · [😉 Implicature](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/topics/implicature/) · 72 works

## Cite

Cite as: Marta Tatu and Dan Moldovan. 2012. A Tool for Extracting Conversational Implicatures. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{tatu2012tool,
  title = {{A Tool for Extracting Conversational Implicatures}},
  author = {Marta Tatu and Dan Moldovan},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12)},
  year = {2012},
  doi = {10.63317/4izsvygx5k9z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.63317/4izsvygx5k9z}
}
```

- [← previous Stones on Display in Joshua 6: The Linguistic Tree Constructor as a "Persuasive Technology"](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/winther-nielsen-2012-stones-display-joshua-6-linguistic/)
- [next → Corpus-based Explorations of Affective Load Differences in Arabic-Hebrew-English](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/strapparava-2012-corpus-based-explorations-affective-load/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2012](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/2012/page/2/)

## References

19 references, 2 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Keith Allan, 2000. Quantity Implicatures and the Lexicon, pages 169–218. Amsterdam:Elsevier. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Keith+Allan%2C+2000%2E+Quantity+Implicatures+and+the+Lexicon%2C+pages+169%E2%80%93218%2E+Amsterdam%3AElsevier%2E)
2. G. Gazdar. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logic Form. New York: Academic. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=G%2E+Gazdar%2E+1979%2E+Pragmatics%3A+Implicature%2C+Presupposition%2C+and+Logic+Form%2E+New+York%3A+Academic%2E)
3. Nancy Green and Sandra Carberry. 1993. A Discourse Plan-Based Approach to a Class of Particularized Conversational Implicature. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pages 117–128. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nancy+Green+and+Sandra+Carberry%2E+1993%2E+A+Discourse+Plan%2DBased+Approach+to+a+Class+of+Particularized+Conversational+Implicature%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+10th+Annual+Meeting+of+the+Eastern+States+Conferen)
4. Nancy L. Green and Sandra Carberry. 1994. [A Hybrid Reasoning Model for Indirect Answers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/green-1994-hybrid-reasoning-model-indirect-answers/). In James Pustejovsky, editor, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 58–65, San Francisco. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morgan Kaufmann.
5. H. P. Grice. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. Volume 3. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003)
6. H. P. Grice. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=H%2E+P%2E+Grice%2E+1989%2E+Studies+in+the+Way+of+Words%2E+Harvard+University+Press%2C+Cambridge%2C+MA%2E)
7. Robert M. Harnish. 1991. Logical Form and Implicature. In Steven Davis, editor, Pragmatics: A Reader, pages 316–364. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Robert+M%2E+Harnish%2E+1991%2E+Logical+Form+and+Implicature%2E+In+Steven+Davis%2C+editor%2C+Pragmatics%3A+A+Reader%2C+pages+316%E2%80%93364%2E+Oxford+University+Press%2C+Oxford%2E)
8. Julia Hirschberg. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. Garland Publishing Company, New York. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Julia+Hirschberg%2E+1991%2E+A+Theory+of+Scalar+Implicature%2E+Garland+Publishing+Company%2C+New+York%2E)
9. J. Hobbs, M. Stickel, D. Appelt, and P. Martin. 1990. Interpretation as Abduction. Artificial Intelligence. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=J%2E+Hobbs%2C+M%2E+Stickel%2C+D%2E+Appelt%2C+and+P%2E+Martin%2E+1990%2E+Interpretation+as+Abduction%2E+Artificial+Intelligence%2E)
10. L. R. Horn. 2004. Implicature. In The Handbook of Pragmatics. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=L%2E+R%2E+Horn%2E+2004%2E+Implicature%2E+In+The+Handbook+of+Pragmatics%2E)
11. Asa Kasher, editor. 1998. Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. Volume IV: Presupposition, Implicature, and Indirect Speech Acts. Routledge, London. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Asa+Kasher%2C+editor%2E+1998%2E+Pragmatics%3A+Critical+Concepts%2E+Volume+IV%3A+Presupposition%2C+Implicature%2C+and+Indirect+Speech+Acts%2E+Routledge%2C+London%2E)
12. S. C. Levinson. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=S%2E+C%2E+Levinson%2E+1983%2E+Pragmatics%2E+Cambridge%2C+England%3A+Cambridge+University%2E)
13. S. C. Levinson. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [↗](https://doi.org/10.11435/gengo1939.2001.120_131)
14. A. S. McCafferty. 1987. Reasoning about Implicature: a Plan-based Approach. UMI. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A%2E+S%2E+McCafferty%2E+1987%2E+Reasoning+about+Implicature%3A+a+Plan%2Dbased+Approach%2E+UMI%2E)
15. D. Moldovan, M. Tatu, and C. Clark. 2010. Role of Semantics in Question Answering. In Semantic Computing, pages 373–419. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470588222.ch19)
16. A. Ritter, C. Cherry, and B. Dolan. 2010. [Unsupervised Modeling of Twitter Conversations](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/ritter-2010-unsupervised-modeling-twitter-conversations/). In Proceedings of NAACL.
17. M. Tatu and D. Moldovan. 2006. A Logic-based Semantic Approach to Recognizing Textual Entailment. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL 2006. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=M%2E+Tatu+and+D%2E+Moldovan%2E+2006%2E+A+Logic%2Dbased+Semantic+Approach+to+Recognizing+Textual+Entailment%2E+In+Proceedings+of+COLING%2FACL+2006%2E)
18. M. Tatu and D. Moldovan. 2007. COGEX at RTE3. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=M%2E+Tatu+and+D%2E+Moldovan%2E+2007%2E+COGEX+at+RTE3%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+ACL%2DPASCAL+Workshop+on+Textual+Entailment+and+Paraphrasing%2E)
19. Jacques Wainer. 1991. Uses of Nonmonotonic Logic in Natural Language Understanding: Generalized Implicatures. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jacques+Wainer%2E+1991%2E+Uses+of+Nonmonotonic+Logic+in+Natural+Language+Understanding%3A+Generalized+Implicatures%2E+Ph%2ED%2E+dissertation%2C+Department+of+Computer+Science%2C+Pennsylvania+State+University%2C+Univers)

*Updated 24 October 2026*