---
title: "Who cites How Long Reasoning Chains — 3 citing papers"
description: "3 papers of the Elamur Research library cite «How Long Reasoning Chains Influence LLMs' Judgment of Answer Factuality», found in their…"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tu-2026-how-long-reasoning-chains-influence/cited-by/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tu-2026-how-long-reasoning-chains-influence/cited-by/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/) / [How Long Reasoning Chains Influence LLMs'…](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tu-2026-how-long-reasoning-chains-influence/) / cited by

# Who cites «How Long Reasoning Chains Influence LLMs' Judgment of Answer Factuality»

3 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 2 with a page here, the most cited first · [← back to «How Long Reasoning Chains Influence LLMs' Judgment of Answer Factuality»](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tu-2026-how-long-reasoning-chains-influence/)

1. **[The Thin Line Between Comprehension and Persuasion in LLMs](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wynter-2026-thin-line-between-comprehension-persuasion/) [Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/findings/)**Adrian de Wynter, Tangming Yuan*2026 · 1 citation*
2. **[UNH @ Rag4Reports: A Broad Exploration of LLM-Judges for RAG](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tran-2026-unh-rag4reports-broad-exploration-llm/) [Workshop on Multilingual Report Generation via Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/venues/rag4reports/)**Minna Tran, Ryan McCarthy, Aiden Parsons, et al.*2026*

1 more paper of our library cites it; it has no page here yet.

- [← back to](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tu-2026-how-long-reasoning-chains-influence/) — How Long Reasoning Chains Influence LLMs' Judgment of Answer Factuality