--- title: "Philosophy — papers" description: "Philosophy: 152 papers of the Elamur Research library · page 1 of 3 · 1–25, the most cited first — our summary of each, its ideas, references and who…" canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/" --- [Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/) [home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [shelves](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/) / [Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/) / Philosophy # 🤔 Philosophy 152 papers · page 1 of 3 · 1–25 · the most cited first · [all shelves](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/) Philosophy is a subfield of Arts and Humanities in the OpenAlex classification of science. The topics most of its papers here are on: «Linguistics and Discourse Analysis», «Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics», «Rhetoric and Communication Studies». ## Papers **1** [2](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/page/2/) [3](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/page/3/) [next →](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/page/2/) 1. [**Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language**John R. Searle*1969 · 6,673 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/searle-1969-speech-acts/) 2. [**Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization**William C. Mann, Sandra A. Thompson*1988 · 4,547 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/mann-1988-rhetorical-structure-theory-functional/) 3. [**Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse**Barbara J. Grosz, Candace L. Sidner*1986 · 2,923 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/grosz-1986-attention-intentions-structure-discourse/) 4. [**Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics**Craige Roberts*2012 · 2,020 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/roberts-2012-information-structure-discourse-towards-integrated/) 5. [**Hedging in Scientific Research Articles**Ken Hyland*1998 · 803 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hyland-1998-hedging-scientific-research-articles/) 6. [**Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays**Christian Stab, Iryna Gurevych*2017 · 613 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/stab-2017-parsing-argumentation-structures-persuasive-essays/) 7. [**Argument Mining: A Survey**John Lawrence, Chris Reed*2019 · 601 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lawrence-2019-argument-mining-survey/) 8. [**Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays**Christian Stab, Iryna Gurevych*2014 · 517 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/stab-2014-identifying-argumentative-discourse-structures-persuasive/) 9. [**The CommitmentBank: Investigating projection in naturally occurring discourse**Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Mandy Simons, Judith Tonhauser*2019 · 410 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marneffe-2019-commitmentbank-investigating-projection-naturally/) 10. [**Annotating Argument Components and Relations in Persuasive Essays**Christian Stab, Iryna Gurevych*2014 · 403 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/stab-2014-annotating-argument-components-relations-persuasive/) 11. [**Representing Discourse Coherence: A Corpus-Based Study**Florian Wolf, Edward Gibson*2005 · 377 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wolf-2005-representing-discourse-coherence-corpus-based/) 12. [**HILDA: A Discourse Parser Using Support Vector Machine Classification**Hugo Hernault, Helmut Prendinger, David A. du Verle, et al.*2010 · 353 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/hernault-2010-hilda-discourse-parser-support-vector/) 13. [**A Corpus for Research on Deliberation and Debate**Marilyn Walker, Jean Fox Tree, Pranav Anand, et al.*2012 · 351 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/walker-2012-corpus-research-deliberation-debate/) 14. [**Anaphora and Discourse Structure**Bonnie Webber, Matthew Stone, Aravind Joshi, et al.*2003 · 315 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/webber-2003-anaphora-discourse-structure/) 15. [**Computational Argumentation Quality Assessment in Natural Language**Henning Wachsmuth, Nona Naderi, Yufang Hou, et al.*2017 · 306 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/wachsmuth-2017-computational-argumentation-quality-assessment-natural/) 16. [**Which argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTM**Ivan Habernal, Iryna Gurevych*2016 · 302 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/habernal-2016-which-argument-is-more-convincing/) 17. [**The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: a surface-based approach**Daniel Marcu*2000 · 281 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marcu-2000-rhetorical-parsing-unrestricted-texts-surface/) 18. [**A Problem for RST: The Need for Multi-Level Discourse Analysis**Johanna D. Moore, Martha E. Pollack*1992 · 280 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/moore-1992-problem-rst-need-multi-level/) 19. [**Lexical Influences on the Perception of Sarcasm**Roger Kreuz, Gina Caucci*2007 · 278 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kreuz-2007-lexical-influences-perception-sarcasm/) 20. [**CODRA: A Novel Discriminative Framework for Rhetorical Analysis**Shafiq Joty, Giuseppe Carenini, Raymond T. Ng*2015 · 263 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/joty-2015-codra-novel-discriminative-framework-rhetorical/) 21. [**Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse**Ivan Habernal, Iryna Gurevych*2017 · 243 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/habernal-2017-argumentation-mining-user-generated-web/) 22. [**Classification and Clustering of Arguments with Contextualized Word Embeddings**Nils Reimers, Benjamin Schiller, Tilman Beck, et al.*2019 · 239 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/reimers-2019-classification-clustering-arguments-contextualized-word/) 23. [**Joint prediction in MST-style discourse parsing for argumentation mining**Andreas Peldszus, Manfred Stede*2015 · 219 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/peldszus-2015-joint-prediction-mst-style-discourse/) 24. [**Automatically Evaluating Text Coherence Using Discourse Relations**Ziheng Lin, Hwee Tou Ng, Min-Yen Kan*2011 · 218 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/lin-2011-automatically-evaluating-text-coherence-discourse/) 25. [**The Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task: Identification and Reconstruction of Implicit Warrants**Ivan Habernal, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych, et al.*2018 · 217 citations*](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/habernal-2018-argument-reasoning-comprehension-task-identification/) **1** [2](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/page/2/) [3](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/page/3/) [next →](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/philosophy/page/2/) Updated 23 October 2026 - [← previous subfield Music](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/music/) - [next subfield → Religious studies](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/religious-studies/) - [↑ back to Arts and Humanities](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/shelves/arts-and-humanities/)