---
title: "Lexicalised and non-lexicalized multi-word — Maziarz 2023"
description: "Princeton WordNet contains many multi-word entries, but not all of them are genuine lexical units."
authors: ["Marek Maziarz", "Łukasz Grabowski", "Tadeusz Piotrowski", "Ewa Rudnicka", "Maciej Piasecki"]
year: 2023
venue: "Proceedings of the 12th Global Wordnet Conference"
source: "https://aclanthology.org/2023.gwc-1.28/"
doi: "10.18653/v1/2023.gwc-1.28"
licence: "CC BY 4.0 (ACL Anthology)"
licence_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
summary_licence: "Elamur Cosmic License"
canonical: "https://research.elamur.ai/free/papers/maziarz-2023-lexicalised-non-lexicalized-multi-word/"
---
[Elamur Research](https://md.research.elamur.ai/) · [this page in HTML](https://research.elamur.ai/free/papers/maziarz-2023-lexicalised-non-lexicalized-multi-word/)

[home](https://md.research.elamur.ai/) / [papers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/) / [2023](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/2023/page/4/) / Lexicalised and non-lexicalized multi-word expressions in WordNet: a cross-encoder approach

# Lexicalised and non-lexicalized multi-word expressions in WordNet: a cross-encoder approach

**Authors:** Marek Maziarz, Łukasz Grabowski, Tadeusz Piotrowski, Ewa Rudnicka, Maciej Piasecki · **Year:** 2023 · **Venue:** Proceedings of the 12th Global Wordnet Conference · **Licence:** [CC BY 4.0 (ACL Anthology)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

**Links:** [Publisher's page](https://aclanthology.org/2023.gwc-1.28/) · [PDF](https://aclanthology.org/2023.gwc-1.28.pdf) · [DOI 10.18653/v1/2023.gwc-1.28](https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.gwc-1.28) · [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W7103896650)

**Citations:** 0 citations (openalex-snapshot · 2026-10-14)

## Summary
Princeton WordNet contains many multi-word entries, but not all of them are genuine lexical units. Some are taxonomy labels, quantifier phrases or ordinary collocations. The authors want to separate lexicalised multi-word lexical units (MWLUs) from ad hoc combinations, and they improve on their earlier rule-based and logistic-regression approach.

They collected about 39k multi-word entries from Princeton WordNet and enWordNet, excluding proper names and chemical and biological taxonomy terms. A sample of 387 items was labelled by checking whether six major English dictionaries list each one as a headword. They then fine-tuned a cross-encoder (setu4993/smaller-LaBSE, via sentence-transformers) on pairs of a lemma and its gloss, with the gloss prefixed by hypernym lemmas.

Under .632 bootstrap validation, the model reached roughly 0.78 F1 on the MWLU class, a clear gain over the earlier feature-based model, though it was not significantly better than the majority-class baseline on that measure.

The work offers a way to clean WordNet's MWE inventory, which NLP research often uses as a gold standard. Because the model is language-agnostic, it could be transferred to other wordnets, such as Polish.

## Key points
- **Dataset and labels:** 39,406 MWEs were drawn from Princeton WordNet and enWordNet, and 86% of them are nouns. The annotated sample of 387 items contains 243 MWLUs and 144 non-MWLUs, labelled against NODE, M-W, Collins, New World, COBUILD and Longman.
- **Model setup:** the model input is the lemma paired with hypernym lemmas plus the definition, truncated to 48 tokens. Training ran for 100 bootstrap iterations of 4 epochs each.
- **Results:** for the MWLU class, precision, recall and F1 were each about 0.78; for non-MWLU they were about 0.62–0.63.
- **Comparisons:**
  - MWLU F1 rose from 58% with the earlier logistic regression to 78% (p\<0.01), while non-MWLU F1 was essentially unchanged.
  - Against the majority baseline (F1 0.77), the MWLU F1 difference was not significant (p=.32).
- **Application and release:** applied to the full WordNet set, the model tagged 25.5k entries as lexicalised. The data are released on GitHub (MarekMaziarz/MWE-recognition-in-WN) under CC BY 4.0.

*Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.*

Fields: [Linguistics & languages](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/shelves/linguistics/)

## Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```bibtex
@inproceedings{maziarz2023lexicalised,
  title = {{Lexicalised and non-lexicalized multi-word expressions in WordNet: a cross-encoder approach}},
  author = {Maziarz, Marek and Grabowski, Łukasz and Piotrowski, Tadeusz and Rudnicka, Ewa and Piasecki, Maciej},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th Global Wordnet Conference},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2023.gwc-1.28},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.gwc-1.28}
}
```

- [← previous LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/ni-2023-lever-learning-verify-language-code/)
- [next → LINC: A Neurosymbolic Approach for Logical Reasoning by Combining Language Models with First-Order Logic Provers](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/olausson-2023-linc-neurosymbolic-approach-logical-reasoning/)
- [↑ back to papers of 2023](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/2023/page/4/)

## References

22 references, 4 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Meghdad Farahmand and Ronaldo Teixeira Martins. 2014. A supervised model for extraction of multiword expressions, based on statistical context features. In Proceedings of the 10th workshop on multiword expressions (MWE), pages 10–16. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Meghdad+Farahmand+and+Ronaldo+Teixeira+Martins%2E+2014%2E+A+supervised+model+for+extraction+of+multiword+expressions%2C+based+on+statistical+context+features%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+10th+workshop+on+multiwor)
2. Christiane Fellbaum, editor. 1998. WordNet – An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Christiane+Fellbaum%2C+editor%2E+1998%2E+WordNet+%E2%80%93+An+Electronic+Lexical+Database%2E+The+MIT+Press%2E)
3. Fangxiaoyu Feng, Yinfei Yang, Daniel Cer, Naveen Arivazhagan, and Wei Wang. 2020. Language-agnostic bert sentence embedding. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Fangxiaoyu+Feng%2C+Yinfei+Yang%2C+Daniel+Cer%2C+Naveen+Arivazhagan%2C+and+Wei+Wang%2E+2020%2E+Language%2Dagnostic+bert+sentence+embedding%2E) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/feng-2020-language-agnostic-bert-sentence-embedding/)
4. Polona Gantar, Lut Colman, Carla Parra Escartín, and Héctor Martínez Alonso. 2018. Multiword expressions: Between lexicography and NLP. 32(2):138– 162. _eprint: [https://academic.oup.com/ijl/article-pdf/32/2/138/29012810/ecy012.pdf](https://academic.oup.com/ijl/article-pdf/32/2/138/29012810/ecy012.pdf). [↗](https://academic.oup.com/ijl/article-pdf/32/2/138/29012810/ecy012.pdf)
5. Howard Jackson. 2022. The Bloomsbury Handbook of Lexicography. Second ed. Bloomsbury Academic, London. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Howard+Jackson%2E+2022%2E+The+Bloomsbury+Handbook+of+Lexicography%2E+Second+ed%2E+Bloomsbury+Academic%2C+London%2E)
6. Elisabetta Jezek. 2016. The Lexicon: An Introduction (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Elisabetta+Jezek%2E+2016%2E+The+Lexicon%3A+An+Introduction+%28Oxford+Textbooks+in+Linguistics%2E+Oxford+University+Press%2C+Oxford%2E)
7. Wenyu Jiang and Richard Simon. 2007. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification. Statistics in medicine, 26(29):5320–5334. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Wenyu+Jiang+and+Richard+Simon%2E+2007%2E+A+comparison+of+bootstrap+methods+and+an+adjusted+bootstrap+approach+for+estimating+the+prediction+error+in+microarray+classification%2E+Statistics+in+medicine%2C+26%282)
8. Leonhard Lipka. 1990. An Outline of English Lexicology; Lexical Structure, Word Semantics, and Word-formation. Max Niemeyer, Tuebingen. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Leonhard+Lipka%2E+1990%2E+An+Outline+of+English+Lexicology%3B+Lexical+Structure%2C+Word+Semantics%2C+and+Word%2Dformation%2E+Max+Niemeyer%2C+Tuebingen%2E)
9. Laurie Bauer. 2019. Complex lexical units. Compounds and multi-word expressions, chapter Compounds and multi-word expressions in English. de Gruyter. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Laurie+Bauer%2E+2019%2E+Complex+lexical+units%2E+Compounds+and+multi%2Dword+expressions%2C+chapter+Compounds+and+multi%2Dword+expressions+in+English%2E+de+Gruyter%2E)
10. Marek Maziarz, Łukasz Grabowski, Tadeusz Piotrowski, Ewa Rudnicka, and Maciej Piasecki. 2023. Lexicalisation of polish and english word combinations: an empirical study. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics. In print. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Marek+Maziarz%2C+%C5%81ukasz+Grabowski%2C+Tadeusz+Piotrowski%2C+Ewa+Rudnicka%2C+and+Maciej+Piasecki%2E+2023%2E+Lexicalisation+of+polish+and+english+word+combinations%3A+an+empirical+study%2E+Poznan+Studies+in+Contemporary)
11. Mathieu Constant, Gülşen Eryiǧit, Johanna Monti, Lonneke van der Plas, Carlos Ramisch, Michael Rosner, and Amalia Todirascu. 2017. Survey: Multiword expression processing: A Survey. Computational Linguistics, 43(4):837–892. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Mathieu+Constant%2C+G%C3%BCls%CC%A7en+Eryig%CC%8Cit%2C+Johanna+Monti%2C+Lonneke+van+der+Plas%2C+Carlos+Ramisch%2C+Michael+Rosner%2C+and+Amalia+Todirascu%2E+2017%2E+Survey%3A+Multiword+expression+processing%3A+A+Survey%2E+Computational+Li) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/constant-2017-survey-multiword-expression-processing-survey/)
12. Marek Maziarz, Ewa Rudnicka, and Łukasz Grabowski. 2022. Multi-word lexical units recognition in wordnet. In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Multiword Expressions@ LREC2022, pages 49–54. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Marek+Maziarz%2C+Ewa+Rudnicka%2C+and+%C5%81ukasz+Grabowski%2E+2022%2E+Multi%2Dword+lexical+units+recognition+in+wordnet%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+18th+Workshop+on+Multiword+Expressions%40+LREC2022%2C+pages+49%E2%80%9354%2E)
13. Anthony Cowie, editor. 2009. The Oxford History of English Lexicography. Clarendon Press. Clarendon Press, London. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Anthony+Cowie%2C+editor%2E+2009%2E+The+Oxford+History+of+English+Lexicography%2E+Clarendon+Press%2E+Clarendon+Press%2C+London%2E)
14. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jacob+Devlin%2C+Ming%2DWei+Chang%2C+Kenton+Lee%2C+and+Kristina+Toutanova%2E+2018%2E+Bert%3A+Pre%2Dtraining+of+deep+bidirectional+transformers+for+language+understanding%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A1810%2E04805%2E)
15. Bradley Efron. 1983. Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. Journal of the American statistical association, 78(382):316–331. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bradley+Efron%2E+1983%2E+Estimating+the+error+rate+of+a+prediction+rule%3A+improvement+on+cross%2Dvalidation%2E+Journal+of+the+American+statistical+association%2C+78%28382%29%3A316%E2%80%93331%2E)
16. Bradley Efron and Robert Tibshirani. 1997. Improvements on cross-validation: the 632+ bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(438):548–560. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bradley+Efron+and+Robert+Tibshirani%2E+1997%2E+Improvements+on+cross%2Dvalidation%3A+the+632%2B+bootstrap+method%2E+Journal+of+the+American+Statistical+Association%2C+92%28438%29%3A548%E2%80%93560%2E)
17. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nils+Reimers+and+Iryna+Gurevych%2E+2019%2E+Sentence%2Dbert%3A+Sentence+embeddings+using+siamese+bert%2Dnetworks%2E+arXiv+preprint+arXiv%3A1908%2E10084%2E)
18. Martin Riedl and Chris Biemann. 2016. Impact of mwe resources on multiword recognition. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Multiword Expressions, pages 107–111. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Martin+Riedl+and+Chris+Biemann%2E+2016%2E+Impact+of+mwe+resources+on+multiword+recognition%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+12th+Workshop+on+Multiword+Expressions%2C+pages+107%E2%80%93111%2E)
19. Ivan A. Sag, Timothy Baldwin, Francis Bond, Ann Copestake, and Dan Flickinger. 2002. Multiword expressions: A pain in the neck for NLP. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 1–15. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ivan+A%2E+Sag%2C+Timothy+Baldwin%2C+Francis+Bond%2C+Ann+Copestake%2C+and+Dan+Flickinger%2E+2002%2E+Multiword+expressions%3A+A+pain+in+the+neck+for+NLP%2E+In+Computational+Linguistics+and+Intelligent+Text+Processing%2C+pa) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/idioms-2002-sag-multiword-expressions-pain-neck-nlp/)
20. Nathan Schneider, Emily Danchik, Chris Dyer, and Noah A Smith. 2014. Discriminative lexical semantic segmentation with gaps: running the mwe gamut. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2:193–206. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nathan+Schneider%2C+Emily+Danchik%2C+Chris+Dyer%2C+and+Noah+A+Smith%2E+2014%2E+Discriminative+lexical+semantic+segmentation+with+gaps%3A+running+the+mwe+gamut%2E+Transactions+of+the+Association+for+Computational+Li) [our card](https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/papers/schneider-2014-discriminative-lexical-semantic-segmentation-gaps/)
21. Tinne Van Rompaey, Kristin Davidse, and Peter Petré. 2015. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: The case of the verbo-nominal expressions be on the/one’s way/road. Functions of Language, 22(2):232–263. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tinne+Van+Rompaey%2C+Kristin+Davidse%2C+and+Peter+Petr%C3%A9%2E+2015%2E+Lexicalization+and+grammaticalization%3A+The+case+of+the+verbo%2Dnominal+expressions+be+on+the%2Fone%E2%80%99s+way%2Froad%2E+Functions+of+Language%2C+22%282%29%3A232%E2%80%932)
22. Michał Woźniak. 2017. Jak znaleźć igl˛e w stogu siana? Automatyczna ekstrakcja wielosegmentowych jed-nostek leksykalnych z tekstu polskiego. IJP PAN, Kraków. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Micha%C5%82+Woz%CC%81niak%2E+2017%2E+Jak+znalez%CC%81c%CC%81+igl%CB%9Be+w+stogu+siana%3F+Automatyczna+ekstrakcja+wielosegmentowych+jed%2Dnostek+leksykalnych+z+tekstu+polskiego%2E+IJP+PAN%2C+Krak%C3%B3w%2E)
